tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-66097533617341217822024-03-04T23:30:56.592-08:00Doug PlumbNew World Order news and commentary. Anti-Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development. Anti Cultural Marxism.
Author of "Power Outage" and "Dr. Treekenstein".Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.comBlogger133125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-49625784062573664432020-09-29T16:40:00.006-07:002020-09-29T16:40:31.195-07:00You Are "Bill Gates".<p><br />
<br />
I personally don't believe that public figures such as Bill Gates or Donald Trump have any power. I wonder if they can even choose their own outfits, even during their time off work. They may even believe they are making all of their own decisions. I think they are chosen because they are crazy megalomaniacs that are easily steered and the public can blame all the insanity on the megalomania of its leaders.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, everyone has a weakness and these weaknesses get exploited by the devil. Its difficult to know if they are crazy or evil.<br />
<br />
Let's just imagine that it's Bill Gates sitting on top of the pyramid.<br />
<br />
From the top of this pyramid, a pure materialist begins to think of his position and moral responsibility. He has landed in a position of directing the future development of humanity (materialism is just a<br />
fertile ground for logical contradictions). To do nothing is a decision as well as to do something.<br />
<br />
What should be done, if anything should be done, to maximize the probability of humanity succeeding as a species on an evolutionary time scale? The obvious solution is that humanity should be farmed in<br />
the same way that racehorses and agricultural animals are farmed, such as in The Republic of Plato. Erase disease and disability through selective breeding. This would be the scientific approach if you ask<br />
the experts - smart disciplined people who worked very hard to know a little tiny bit more about the human body than you do, the new priesthood. The human system is unbelievably complex - far beyond<br />
anything that our math could characterize - well understood by anyone with coursework in systems theory at the early undergrad level knows.<br />
<br />
What if humanity could start again in some remote location unknown to almost everyone? In this place live the ideal human beings, athletes, poets, mathematicians, all brilliantly funny and better looking than the average teenaged supermodel. No trace of any harmful physical or mental pathologies here. With sufficient numbers (I've heard 600 - 800) humanity can be reconstructed. Humanity 2.0.<br />
<br />
Evolving technology provides a class of robots that performs mundane tasks and maintains itself. Humanity 2.0 thinks in terms of the abstract and the beautiful and stretches the physical capability of<br />
the body to that of a circus acrobat. Deep-sea exploration and maybe even space exploration becomes possible. Science becomes scientific again and everyone learns the science of right (jurisprudence).<br />
<br />
What do you do with Humanity 1.0? There are just too many of them to just send them to a giant slaughterhouse and the nukes aren't actually real. All men are sinners and entitlement is always more attractive than responsibility. You get them to commit suicide by infecting groups within the group with a culture of entitlement, or at least a grandiose sense of superiority. You divide humanity into entitled<br />
groups and have them fight each other until everyone is destroyed or too weak to fight any longer.<br />
<br />
Things get sicker and sicker with time as the great Western nations, once conscious of both fact and right are no more conscious of right. Nothing can be said to be true or false, its all a matter of opinion.<br />
There is no clear definition of evil as we lose Christianity and it's single commandment "Do unto others as you would have done to yourself". Its the basis of Western Jurisprudence. Universal laws have<br />
created the precision of fairness of a logical statement. Everyone, in the heart, knows what the law is. Christ brought it to light.<br />
<br />
The assholes have created a class of morons that hate Christianity because of the programming of Hollywood, Public Education, and the Networks.<br />
<br />
To pull this off, you destroy the weak ones with public education, drugs, and entertainment media. You encourage the strong ones to escape the mundane and be your soldiers.<br />
<br />
Psychological assault, self-worship, materialism, cultural suicide, and fomented conflict burn Humanity1.0 to the ground.<br />
<br />
You create specialists to replace God and train those professionals to drink the purple Kool-Aid by the gallon, where the ordinary person drinks it one cup at a time. You create a class of professionals that<br />
are so overwhelmed by difficult study they lack the further curiosity to learn about political science, morals, or law. Implant a sense of hubris into their training so they feel they don't need any further<br />
education in what is "obvious". Corrupt them, show them that corruption and evil is the true light.<br />
<br />
God will be money and power (Luciferians). Train them never to question their peers and to never deviate from the narrative created by their superiors and comrades in their words and actions. Blind faith in their own specialists is required. The "peer review" and "fact-checking"regulates information and directs thought along the narrative.<br />
<br />
Give them special privileged talks where they are exposed to the useless eater problem. Explain everything that is wrong with Western society and teach them absolutely nothing about the science of right or the foundations of modern Western society.<br />
<br />
Remove the great German Enlightenment thinker, Kant, from the consciousness of Western thinkers. Kant's protege, Fichte, came up with the idea of nationhood and this modern Western system (Fichte's<br />
book is only available in German). Ensure that their political understandings never exceed some essays written by politicians. Ensure they never understand the structure of the West and its basis in the<br />
science of universal law and everlasting peace, Christianity. (See my "Christian Doctrine: Why They Hate Us" on youtube)<br />
<br />
Who are the useless eaters then? It depends on perspective. I doubt that people like Bill Gates have much use for the Rockefeller Health Professionals. Everyone eventually becomes a useless eater as the<br />
standard changes to meet the requirement of declining numbers. I wonder what the doctors think they will be doing after their clients, the useless eaters, are all gone? Who will watch the overpaid athletes<br />
play football? Who will be the students for the professors?<br />
<br />
Only Christianity with its doctrines of separation of powers, the Trinity, Original Sin, and universal law can regulate us back to reality. Otherwise, everyone gets what they deserve in triplicate as the world cleansing begins.</p><div class="adL"><br />
</div><p> </p>Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-77588925218345623252020-03-26T04:14:00.000-07:002020-03-26T04:14:33.617-07:00Assholes.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div align="LEFT">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT">
The following essay is in audio form on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BJ3fXO5S1g&feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">YouTube</a> and here </div>
<div align="LEFT">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT">
<br /></div>
<div align="LEFT">
<span style="color: black;">I first encountered a book on
this topic, Aaron James book “Assholes” on mainstream
bookshelves, it is sold everywhere. Its a good light reading book,
with two incredibly important takeaways that I wanted to elaborate
on. “Asshole” is a distinctively Western term and Westerners
understand its meaning clearly. There is much to be said about these
two takeaways.</span></div>
<span style="color: black;">Aaron James defines the asshole as one that
believes he can operate by a different set of rules than everyone
else. He explains that masculine word is “asshole” and the
feminine is “bitch”. “Asshole” and “bitch” have the same
meaning, but here I will use the masculine sense, else some of those
Rockefeller Feminist bitches might complain that I am discriminating
against women by focusing this essay on bitches rather than assholes.
I am safe from the censors if I stick to assholes because assholes
are men. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">You have to be careful about what you say
because there are a lot of assholes that don't think others deserve
the right of free speech, although they themselves cannot possibly
believe that their own words should ever be censored. Ideals trump
reason and rationality in a world run by assholes.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">In my experience there are two fundamentally
different types of assholes, but they are both assholes for the same
reason. There is the arrested development kind of asshole who does
not or cannot think beyond punishment and reward in terms of moral
conduct and explanations for this lie outside the scope of this essay
and are generally well understood. There is the second kind of
asshole, the kind with power. </span><br />
<span style="color: black;"> </span>
<br />
<h3 style="text-align: center;">
<u><span style="color: black;">Assholes Of The Second Kind. </span></u></h3>
<span style="color: black;"> </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">I think there are three important
observations to be made with the asshole of the second kind. The
Republic Of Plato states that secret societies exist to take
something away from everyone else and that war is fought for money.
The book is 2500 years old but as true today as it was back then.
There are universal truths in political science. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">The removal of narcissism as a personality
disorder from the Diagnostics and Statistics Manual (DSM) in
psychiatry has allowed this kind of asshole to proliferate rather
than be treated or somehow retarded from having jobs that may involve
rational moral thinking of a higher order, I will explain Kohlberg's
Stages Of Moral Development in a few moments.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">If you are going to talk about assholes in
the context of society at large, the topic of the law profession
inevitably becomes a key component of the conversation. In Canada, I
am sure that the law profession encourages assholism and I can prove
this beyond any reasonable doubt, but this is not the topic of this
essay.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">The very first science was the science of
jurisprudence of Rome. The very word “law” implies universality.
Law, whether physical, mathematical or moral is universal. In the
case of Western law it's basis is universal law, and its essential
purpose is to protect you and me from assholes rather than protect an
ideological agenda of the powers that be such as in purely statutory
systems. The word asshole is essentially a scientific term and not a
term of art due to its strict definition.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">As a science, it stands up well over time.
Its initial precept has not changed in 2000 years, whereas physics
has undergone changes in its precepts, first the work of Newton and
now Maxwell's and Noethers. Only math and moral law have not had
their basic precepts changed - math and the universal law are both
accepted rational truths. The very idea of the asshole is as a-priori
as the shortest distance between two points being a straight line.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Laws require statutes. Statutes are written
with law in mind, statutes make the judgment less dependent on the
judge and shorten the time that would otherwise be taken by deducing
verdict strictly from first principles. This is the great Roman
Justinian innovation to fight corruption, the judgment being made
less dependent on the judge, who may be an asshole. It's also worth
noting that if engineers deduced everything from first principles we
would still be dependent on steam engines. A modern fair system must
have many laws but too many laws can lead to statutory abuse. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Statutes need to be regulated and the common
law, or the idea of universal law regulates courts to prevent
statutory abuse. This is the great innovation of Christianity above
other forms of purely statutory religions. Christianity is
revolutionary rather than evolutionary when compared to other well
known religions in the West in that it is regulative, not
constitutive. It regulates statutes so that we are not abused by
assholes. Statutes are pictures of this horse, the common law is the
actual horse. Statutes, ideally, are ideal expressions of the common
law but we don't live in an ideal world.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">The great Original Writ of Western
Jurisprudence is universal law, sometimes referred to as natural law,
but there are faults with every expression, so it is also called the
“unwritten law” or the Great Unwritten Writ in books about
theoretical jurisprudence. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">This natural law has been expressed in many
ways, the Greek Golden Rule, The single commandment of the New
Testament, the Roman “Right of self”, and in Kant's three
successive categorical imperatives. I cannot see why “don't be an
asshole” could not be a modern expression of this common law, this
precept that is necessary for a science, in this case the science of
jurisprudence. Imagine if those words were carved in stone on every
courthouse and had lawful force and effect.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Like math having counting and the shortest
distance between two points being a straight line is enough to know
to be able to deduce all of math, the ideal of “don't be an
asshole”could be a precept for the purely rational science of
jurisprudence, but the single commandment of the New Testament is
written in stone and has served the West well and essentially says
the same thing.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Christianity has the concept of Original
Sin, no law can be perfect and applied jurisprudence is filled with
practical difficulties as anyone who has watched Judge Judy can
attest.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">The science of law knows a lot about
assholes, but statutory regulators do not always know a lot about
law, and in many cases they are assholes. People always vote for the
lessor of the assholes currently running for office rather than run
for office themselves and people tend to vote for highly qualified
assholes rather than less qualified non assholes. We worship experts
rather than good, honest and hardworking people.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">There is always the kind of asshole that
puts himself into a position of having to serve two masters (the
people and the financial institutions). People fall into corruption
and power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. To be
protected from assholes we must have other assholes in power, its the
central argument for anarchy. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Its the original sin. No man can be a moral
ideal. We know what is right and wrong, but every single one of us
steps in dog shit once in a while. We live in an empirical world.
Satan rules the empirical world, Christ rules in the rational world
with the precept of universal law. He states that he is not of this
world in the New Covenant.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">I believe that assholes grew in great
numbers when countries allowed private banks to print their money,
and made the countries go bankrupt. Elected governments must operate
within parameters set by banks and serve the public at the same time.
No man can serve two masters, so everyone that tries must be an
asshole to some degree. Alan Greenspan explains the power of the
banks on YouTube. We live in a world full of assholes because the
world is run by private money interests with great concentrations of
power, and therefore great concentrations of corruption, and powerful
assholes. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Christ himself threw the money changers out
of the temple. One does not mix water, the law of man, with wine, the
law of reason which gets better with age, unless necessary and money
changers do not belong in a place of reasoned law.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Assholes are often sorry they ever became
assholes. Imagine if you were walking in a field with dog shit all
over the place. If you could never wipe your shoe, would you worry
about stepping in it? Probably not because you know it will
eventually happen and that shit will stick to your shoe and you can't
get it off. So you give up and end up tracking it all over the place.
Forgiveness is a necessary part of a good society and a key aspect of
Christianity, it lets us wipe off our shoes and always try not to be
assholes. The expression “oh well, I'm going to hell anyway” just
makes you another asshole in Christianity.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">There are three kinds of societies according
to Kant, the juristic, the despotic and the ethical society. Kant
states succintly, in Metaphysics of Morals, “No one would want to
live in an ethical society”. The juristic society has its laws
regulated by the common law which creates the science of
jurisprudence, hence juristic society. The despotic society is the
anarchist society where there are no laws to protect people from
assholes that have power. It is a transitional state as society
switches from ethical base to juristic, or from juristic to ethical
as we are currently experiencing this slow change as ideologies seem
to trump what most people think of as common sense.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Ethics is an art because it isn't universal
and doesn't have precepts from which a science depends. An ethical
system is a system run by men rather than principles. The artist may
paint the tree is such a way as its colors please the viewers of the
painting. An artist can paint a picture of a tree from a picture of a
tree ad infinitum, eventually the painted tree no longer has the
essential characteristics of a tree because it loses it's reference
to the actual tree. The scientist must draw the tree as it truly is
or face sharp criticism.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">There is always the dangers of assholes
taking power in an ethical society because ethical societies cannot
be regulated by the common law. It's precepts come from the hopes,
dreams and aspirations of its ruling classes, ideologies, rather than
universal principles. It is one law for them another for us. It is
asshole law and the people will demand an ethical society citing all
of the negatives of the juristic society and without knowing the
basis, nature and real history of the juristic society, other than
that told by assholes of the second kind that run our society.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">There is no yardstick from which to define
evil in an ethical society. Evil is as what opposes the agenda that
defines the ethic. The agenda changes and the ethic changes along
with it.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Assholes have killed more than one hundred
million people in the previous century alone and there are always new
assholes saying they are smarter than the assholes of history and
they will not have to be assholes like the ones of history, such as
the ones behind the “Great Leap Forward” or the “New Soviet”,
agenda's that killed tens of millions of people who were Christians
and therefore had a yardstick from which to clearly identify
assholes. There will always be newer and better assholes of the
second kind because power creates them and they will always be
threatened by Christianity.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">History is often recognized as a great big
lie, a lie of omission told by assholes. Its not what these assholes
say, but what they do not say that allows beliefs and opinions to be
molded to the needs of assholes in power. Lies of omission are much
less easily detected than lies of commission. Most people know
nothing about the Bolshevik Revolution or Great Leap Forward or the
many other communist revolutions in the world during the last century
because mainstream history is a series of lies of omission rather
than commission, and they are written by assholes to serve the needs
of the assholes in power rather than the truth.</span><br />
<br />
<h3 style="text-align: center;">
<u><span style="color: black;">Assholes of the First Kind. </span></u></h3>
<span style="color: black;"> </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Blackstone's commentary on English law uses
the word “mean” in place of “stupid”, back then stupidity and
meanness were almost synonyms. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Morality was taught but sometimes not well
understood by the stupid. Now we have educated assholes of the first
kind because the education system does not include enough moral
education to match the level of power they attain from the practice
of the sciences.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">C. S. Lewis explains that people in our
scientific society study advanced topics and ideas but do not have
the moral education required to understand the larger issues that go
with their power and influence. This creates what he calls “clever
devils”.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Being famous used to denote fame for some
great moral act. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Assholes of the second kind deliberately
create a retarded development in society to create the assholes of
the first kind that will accept a society run by assholes of the
second kind. Many simply do not care, or believe they have no power
when all the power lies in their own willingness to accept
responsibility, not only with votes but with wallet as well. This
first kind of asshole operates only from immediate self interest, not
long term, and expects those around him to do the same, and expects
to be ruled by assholes of the second kind.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">One hundred years ago we would have
recognized the disadvantage of allowing corporations to export
know-how and productive capacities. People would buy things made by
their relatives, friends and neighbors. Now we all buy things made by
foreign slaves in ethical systems of government run by assholes of
the second kind for the short term benefit of cost savings. We
worship comfort rather than the good as our highest ideal. Rousseau
explains that comfort is one of the great corruptors of mankind.
Comfort makes us weak and stupid and we export the power of the
people when we export productivity. People losing power leads to
people being ruled by assholes.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">In political and historical discussions we
forget the great standard of truth, the cross examination. That which
cannot stand up to cross examination cannot be said to be true.
Censorship prevents cross examinations. The scientific method is for
the physical sciences and is really nothing more than a physical
cross examination of hypothesis by experiment, thought experiments or
actual physical ones. Its the gold standard of proof initially
brought to us by the Roman jurists. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">The concept of evidence also came from the
Romans and modern man does not understand what the word “evidence”
actually means. Hearsay and media evidence is not actual evidence
unless backed by physical evidence. There is in fact no reason to
believe that airplanes struck anywhere on 9-11 simply because there
is no physical evidence to back this assertion. There is every reason
to expect a preponderance of physical evidence if airplanes were in
fact involved. If one does not know what evidence is, how can one
form a credible opinion on anything?</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">John Locke once said that the reason for
conflict is lack of communication. The defense of ideologies at the
expense of universal law requires censorship and therefore increases
the possibility of conflict in principle. One can only look at the
behavior of those pushing for an ethical society to see how
censorship and even violence are used to quash contrary viewpoints.
One can be arrested now for expressing contrary viewpoints to
“accepted narratives” or challenging establishment ideals. Its
likely that I will face censorship for describing Rockefeller
Feminist bitches, and perhaps not even from the Rockefeller Feminist
bitches themselves but from some other asshole. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Communication is the tool intelligent people
use to resolve conflict. Understanding reduces conflict and can only
occur with communication. The better and greater the communication,
the less chance for conflict. Communication is often restricted by
assholes to foment conflict, divide people and create a society more
easily led by assholes of the second kind.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Having a valid opinion requires knowledge of
both sides of an argument. To have a valid opinion means you believe
you can win a debate and for that you have to know your opponents
view and why it is wrong, and why he believes it to be true. You can
only get this by listening, not by censorship. What do you know that
he doesn't? What does he know that you do not? Common ground is
achieved with communication. People having common ground gives them
defense from assholes of the second kind.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Now people are simply programmed and the
modern university educated people have no idea about anything called
a juristic society or healthy debate, or really anything that could
credibly challenge their programmed views. Education and media
programming are designed and created by the assholes of the second
kind. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">They will stand and cheer for a more ethical
society, they will stand and cheer as new more powerful assholes take
power and the former assholes that were regulated by scientific
jurisprudence disappear, or are executed.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">A dumbed down publicly educated and media
educated citizen does not understand basic principles of truth, and
therefore can be easily regulated with simple propaganda created by
assholes. This propaganda takes the form of lies by omission rather
than commission as well as ideas that get planted into the
subconscious mind in movies created by the assholes of Hollywood.
This is a very simple and very powerful technique of propaganda. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Watch almost any movie that involves
assholes of the first kind as it's antagonist. They are almost always
visibly Christians. This gets people hating Christianity at the
subconscious level and then later looking at facts that add up to
historical lies of omission written by assholes that reinforce their
opinion that is ultimately based on feeling rather than fact.</span><br />
<br />
<h3 style="text-align: center;">
<u><span style="color: black;">Kohlberg Stages of Moral Development.</span></u></h3>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Kohlberg's stages of moral development is a
simple, well respected and well known idea. There are hundreds of
short five minute explanations for this three stage explanation of
moral development on YouTube. Each stage contains part (a) and part
(b), some call it six stages. I'm going to explain this concept in a
simplified three stage form to better match the context of this
essay. Readers are strongly encouraged to watch a few of the many
YouTube videos on this topic done by experts.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">In stage one we have the people pleasing
level. The child seeks only to please those around them and please
himself, obedience and self interest are the key words in identifying
this first stage.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Social pressure can be quite powerful, we
all conform against our better judgment to some degree and
politicians operate from pressure from the electorate as well as
pressure to conform to long term ethical agendas from the assholes of
the second kind. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">They are representatives and therefore vote
on behalf of the represented. The squeaky wheel gets oiled. This is
how Western Democracy works and its maintenance must fall on the
citizen if authority and responsibility are to remain balanced. There
is no other way for a democracy to work. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">The politician can work at stage one and
often does so willingly and knowingly. Pleasing your supporters
defines the responsibilities associated with the job, because in
reality the politicians only quantifiable responsibility is to get
himself re-elected. Doing the right thing gets you negative media
coverage from assholes and reduced chances of being re-elected.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Somehow, in the media, politicians that were
the lesser assholes were made out to be total assholes and the total
assholes were portrayed as non assholes. People stopped watching and
participating in the system sensing that they were being lied to by
assholes. The system became over run by assholes who were really just
working in the interest of other bigger and more powerful assholes
who run banks and corporations. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Public education policy changed and the
responsibility of participating in and maintaining a democracy was no
longer taught. People began to think of themselves as merely
driftwood floating in a sea of assholes.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Many people now operate professionally at
stage one of the stages of moral development. We are becoming a
society of assholes of the first kind, and this society is run by
assholes of the second kind. You can bet that in hell there is a
preponderance of assholes and we are well on our way there.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">In stage two there is the recognition for
rules. Society must have laws to exist and people should follow those
laws for the good of society. This is called the “conventional
level” of moral development and moral development ceases at this
point for many, maybe even most people.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">In stage three, the post conventional stage,
there is the recognition that no law can be truly universal.
Universal principles trump written law. Fewer people reach this stage
of abstract reasoning and this level of reasoning is required to
truly understand both Christianity and the science of Western
Jurisprudence. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Christianity has the disadvantage of a low
cognitive availability because it is not about simple rule following
such as the case with other statutory religions. Christian concepts
such as Original Sin, The Trinity and the concept of forgiveness have
been deduced from logic and reason and they can be justified rather
than merely accepted as another rule created by powerful and
illustrious assholes. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">The Catholics did not only play a key role
in the development of modern science but deduced these rational moral
concepts from the concept of universal law as preached by Christ in
the New Covenant, just as mathematicians created calculus from
arithmetic and the basic precepts of Euclidean geometry. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Assholes in power have painted the Catholics
as evil with selective propaganda and lies of omission because the
Catholics and Protestant Christians have the cognitive tools to
identify assholes and therefore must be brainwashed to hate their own
religion, or be dumbed down or destroyed to impede opposition that
assholes of the second kind may otherwise face.</span><br />
<br />
<h3 style="text-align: center;">
<u><span style="color: black;">Conclusions. </span></u></h3>
<span style="color: black;"> </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">The word “asshole” is a uniquely Western
word because the West has a system of laws and of internal ethics
that essentially follows universal law. The Western consciousness is
essentially Christian and Christianity gives us the universal law in
written form so that it cannot be changed or restated to serve the
needs of assholes in powerful positions. For the most part we treat
others the way we would wish or expect to be treated in the West. The
Western nations are where everyone wants to live. No one leaves a
Western country to live in an ethical, or in other words, under a
communist system of government.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">This written law of the New Covenant is the
lawful basis of the Commonwealth and it is similar in non
commonwealth Western countries. The West adopted universal law as a
principle from which to regulate law making to create good laws that
encourage and preserve human rights, which leads to good commerce and
high productivity. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">It is the only system of law that forbids
slavery because it is juristic and therefore universal where ethical
systems are not universal by definition. Christianity and universal
law ended slavery in civilized countries. Very few Christians have
ever been involved in slavery. Slavery is the business of those who
follow statutory rule and ethical systems unregulated by the
principle of universal law.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">This universal law is the best antidote to
the asshole problem, and it is essentially the single commandment of
the New Testament. The Western tradition of law may soon be replaced
by Noahide, an ethical form of law, written by Jews to govern non
Jews. Under Noahide rule Jews and non Jews are governed by different
laws. This should remind us the original definition of the asshole. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">No one should want to be ruled by assholes,
even if they think they are better connected to the assholes in power
than everyone else, or even if they are one of the assholes
themselves. Anything can change under an ethical system, as Alexander
Solzhenitsyn explains in Gulag Archipelago.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">The Protestant Kant explains that
Christianity is the “best map of human consciousness” and Kant
believed we had moral knowledge a-priori. That is, purely from reason
itself prior to any experience. Experience shines a light in the mind
to what is already there. The West will soon lose Christianity and
common law rule simply because it's people have been dumbed down with
public education and media by assholes to the point of not being able
to understand it. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">Statutory religions such as Judaism, Islam,
Atheism and Feminism do not have this clear definition of evil which
is why Christianity, by a very long shot, has been the most
persecuted religion of history. Assholes in power do not like
Christianity and the Christian yardstick for clearly identifying
them.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Christianity and Western Jurisprudence
remain the best cognitive tools from which to identify assholes,
which is why they are both under attack by assholes in power and the
asshole propagandists and the asshole public educators who serve
these assholes of the second kind.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Thank you for listening, please share, like
and comment or send questions and comments to Doug Plumb. </span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;">D o u g P l u m b 1 2 3 at gmail dot com.
Also see my Youtube channel, Doug Plumb.</span><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<div align="LEFT">
<br /><br />
</div>
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-56606600010077819492019-01-19T15:53:00.000-08:002019-04-01T18:21:01.436-07:00Western Jurisprudence <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-size: large;">The title sounds heavy, and it is. I was going to do my third video
about this topic and still may. But right now my new thoughts have to be
committed to paper because these thoughts have been running around in
my mind for a while and they make noise. I wish I had more time to write
this, or I could get BH to make it funny, because it could be funny,
but coming from this dry philosopher, it won't be.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Imagine you are on a construction site.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> You are on the third floor and watching an argument between the
carpenter and the plumber. The plumber had just went downstairs from the
second floor to cut a pipe for this apartment on the third floor
(slightly out of breath) and meets the carpenter putting the final
touches on the kitchen counter. He goes to stick his pipe in and finds
it 2 inches too short from the wall. He looks over at the carpenter to
explain that his counter was off 2 inches. The carpenter picks up his
measuring tape and checks the distance between the counter and water
heater and says his distance is right on. So the process repeats all the
way up and down the building with tradesmen arguing. The arguments
intensify.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Numerous court cases are filed for time and money lost. Who is
going to win and who is going to lose? With the state of politics in our
present situation, I would have to say that whoever is best "connected", or of the superior race
would win. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> In this particular scenario, there would be no other
yardstick from which to rule. There is nothing solid that the judge can
go to to make a truly objective determination.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> The court will rely on numerous judgements and statements made by
the tradespeople, all subjective in nature because the measurements were
taken from where the guys thought they should be taken.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"> So what actually solves this problem? If the building had a
cornerstone, the correctness or incorrectness of all measurements could
be taken. Everyone's errors could be measured from the cornerstone and
all responsibility would be laid bare. <b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The judge would be unburdened from making a subjective judgement . </span></b><b>The cornerstone makes the judges life easy and makes the tradesmen's life fair.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> </b>The law is in a sense is similar to a building,
each code depends to a certain extent on each and every other code. It
can be the subject of much subjective interpretation. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> One could argue a
case in self defence where someone blew a guys head off at 100 yards
with a .303 while the guy was carrying a knife and walking in the
opposite direction. These kinds of questions are what juries are for and
I have to clarify that this is not what I'm talking about.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> This is certainly a problem within
the law but it's not really an every day kind of problem.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Just the number of codes and regulations creates problems and
attorneys go in and argue their interpretations of this and that act or
statute. There is probate as well. They become like the tradespeople,
each arguing from a perspective.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Jurisprudence became a science in Rome and it is the first thing called a "science" and it
came about with jurists looking for a cornerstone. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Socrates essentially
asks what this cornerstone could be in Plato's Republic and finds the Golden Rule. The Romans
refined jurisprudence with the all seeing God Jupiter and this same essential law is codified in the New Testament (single commandment: "do unto others as you would have done to yourself), along with rational guidelines
for its preservation (Tree of Knowledge, Water and Wine..). This is
Christianity.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Christianity is the common law and forms the underlying structure of both governments and courts, whether they choose to admit that or not. Common law is Christianity and it is completely rational. Christianity brings rationalism into religion and codifies and preserves it. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Not many Christians understand this or even the basic doctrines and lessons of the Bible. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> In the story above, without a connection to a jurist cornerstone, the judge is burdened
with making a subjective judgement or reading and interpreting thousands
of lines of code and then making a subjective judgement. With a
cornerstone in place, the judge may find one side clearly in error, in which case, in
fact, he has no choice.<b> The judgement is independent of the judge.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> So there is a fundamental difference between a system of laws that
has a cornerstone and one that does not. Christianity has the
cornerstone, no other system has this cornerstone. Judaism depends on
its Rabbi's, Islam has the Imam's and Atheists have their scientists. The Monkey religion has its faith in its rulers. These are all known as statutory religions. They exist for the will of their rulers and have no universal principle.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"> With better laws, comes better productivity and that is how the West
became powerful, not genetic superiority. The idea of genetic
superiority explaining this is a result of an empirical determination of
cause. The rational explanation of cause has the advantage in that it
is universal.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> The Bible tells us not to be concerned with geneologies. Going back just 64 generations, each of us has 2^64 grandparents. I hope the ones on my branch decided not to "keep it in the family". </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> It is the destruction of this beautiful Common Law itself that will result in the destruction of the West.</span></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-40943309828201392942018-08-06T05:26:00.002-07:002018-08-06T05:26:24.549-07:00Applying Numbers to the JQ<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
I have been curious about the JQ over the past few months and finally
decided to sit down and put some numbers to it using basic statistics.
For those who do not know, the JQ is the "Jewish Question". It asks why a
disproportionate number of Jews hold the seats of power in Western
societies. Numbers lead to an unbiased conclusion as long as they are
understood. This essay may be unsuitable for those who are offended by
people who ask the JQ.<br />
The JQ is answered by the popular talking
heads on YouTube such as Jordan Peterson, Alex Jones and Stephan
Molyneux, people who have a clear bias toward the Jewish race and
believe them to be superior and that they should be running things based
on their inherent superiority. Its a clearly juvenile viewpoint for
anyone who has actually read philosophy and the philosophy of laws. Most
listeners of Peterson and Molyneux have not, so its easy to pull the
wool over their eyes. Both Molyneux and Jones married into the
matriarchal Judaism. I don't know if Peterson did or not. There are many
other sycophants online as bad as these three, it is these three that I
know well.<br />
This has been a simple calculation and the assumptions are:<br />
<br />
(1) IQ is normally distributed among any suitably sized group<br />
(2) Standard deviation is 15 for both populations and all IQ's.<br />
(3)
Jewish population is assumed to be 20,000, the population of White
Goyim is assumed to be 1 million. Jews have about 2% of the numbers of
White Goyim in America.<br />
<br />
I did this for two assumptions,
(1) Jews IQ = 130 average, (2) Jews IQ = 115, in both cases average
White Goyim IQ is 100. I did not calculate for IQ above 175, assuming
these numbers to be too small for normal distribution.<br />
I did it
for an IQ of 130 just to help visualize how the numbers change. The
average Jewish IQ is no where near 130, unless you are just listening to
Alex Jones. Realistically it may be as high as 115, but more likely
around 108.<br />
<br />
Results:<br />
<br />
<strong>(1) Jewish IQ = 130, White Goyim IQ = 100</strong><br />
<br />
IQ > 130:<br />
Jews:10,000<br />
White Goyim: 22,800<br />
<br />
IQ>145<br />
Jews 3,174<br />
White Goyim: 1,300<br />
<br />
IQ>160<br />
Jews: 560<br />
White Goyim: 30<br />
<br />
<strong>(2) Jewish IQ= 115, White Goyim IQ =100</strong><br />
<br />
IQ>130<br />
Jews: 3,174<br />
White Goyim: 22,800<br />
<br />
IQ>145<br />
Jews: 456<br />
White Goyim: 1,300<br />
<br />
IQ>160<br />
Jews: 26<br />
White Goyim: 30<br />
<br />
So,
given the amount of Jewish power in government, academia, the media,
publishing and of course finance, do these numbers explain it? Will
affirmative action be applied to upper level positions in banks?<br />
I'm
not a fan of IQ testing, I test above 115. Even adherents to this
answer to the JQ admit that Jews may have a higher IQ with numbers and
words but that White Goyim is better at spatial orientation. IQ tests
can therefore be skewed, if this is true.<br />
You find Jews in math
and computer engineering, but not in mechanical or civil engineering.
Engineering has been viewed as an inferior profession by many and this
may explain the small number of Jews in engineering.<br />
Another
useful comparison would be to compare philosophies. Compare Maimonides
(the great lawyer of the Jews, known as Ram Bam in the Talmud) with one
of our great scholars of law, Immanual Kant, or von Savigny. Compare the
past century great thinkers in Judaism, Max Horkheimer and Theodore
Adorno with CS Lewis.<br />
The White Goyim philosophy has been to find
the universals, as it has been for thousands of years. It has grown
finer with age, as Christ said it would (the wine). The Jewish
philosophy has been to espouse Jewish Supremism and to place the Goyim
in a highly negative light, to say the least. It is fairly and
reasonably called hate literature. It does not have the brilliance or
the braininess of the universal philosophy of the White Goyim, who is
clearly unmatched in this field. Only the White Christian does
philosophy to find universals rather than in group supremism as in
Judaism and Islam.<br />
<br />
On the topic of philosophy I would
like to leave you with two thoughts. The best and the brightest have the
greatest capacity for evil as well as good. We have a society led by
the best and brightest. How did they become eaters of the pizza? The
answer is that they have been given too much liberty. The human being
has a natural inclination to expand horizons and is not always good.
This IS NOT original sin, as Douglas Murray claims it is. Original sin
and sacrifice will have to be the topic of another essay. (the two go
hand in hand)<br />
CS Lewis writes the following passage at the very
start of the Screwtape Letters: (Screwtape, the older devil is giving
instruction to his apprentice, Wormwood)<br />
<br />
"...It sounds
as if you supposed that argument was the way to keep him out of our
Enemies clutches. That may have been so if he lived a few centuries
earlier. At that time humans still knew pretty well when a thing was
proved and when it was not, and if it was true they really believed it.
They still connected thinking with doing and were prepared to alter
their way of life based on a chain of reasoning. But with the weekly
press and other such weapons we have largely altered that. Your man,
ever since he was a boy, has been accustomed to having a dozen
incompatible philosophies dancing around in his head. He does not think
of doctrines as "true" or "false", but as "academic", "practical",
"outworn", "contemporary", "conventional" or "ruthless". Jargon and not
argument is your best weapon for keeping him out of the Church.<br />
<br />
...By the very act of arguing, you awaken his reason and who knows where that may lead"<br />
<br />
The
last line really explains why argument about politics is nearly
forbidden in modern society and people are offended when truth emerges
that challenges their world view.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-76371882782522846662018-05-20T09:01:00.000-07:002018-05-20T09:01:03.227-07:00Does The Left Create Victimhood?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div>
<div class="u-serif-font-main--large">
<div class="ui_qtext_expanded">
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">Victim
hood creates debt that does not exist in reality, this divides people,
makes them angry and creates new groups for leftist exploitation. The
Left creates the problems, then offers dialectical materialism to create
solutions. Dialectical materialism is the dialect between science and
matter and it encompasses the idea that science can one day solve all of
the worlds problems and that all problems stem from economics.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
problem with this basic idea is that it is purely reactionary and gives
no yardstick from which to judge matters and thus no way back to
rational thought. Cultural Marxism has no course but to be purely
reactionary and therefore problems are required to get us to think in
this context. When problems do not exist they must be created.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">A
perfect example of created divisions is the “White Mans Privilege” and
its mythology that it was White Christians that ran the black slave
trade. In truth a disproportionally low number of White Christians were
involved. It was known as the Jewish Black slave trade during its time.
(see E. Michael Jones, Michael Hoffman, Henry Makow, and other scholars)</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">This
makes blacks angry at whites and they wish to seek redress, this is
happening in South Africa where Whites are being murdered and a genocide may soon occur.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">The Left says that the
Whites stole the land. I say the whites civilized South Africa and
brought the Blacks common law. The population of blacks exploded from 2
million consisting of warring tribes to around 40 million living in
relative peace under the white mans Common Law.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">Cultural
Marxism is all about destroying ideas like common law and original sin
and bringing dialectical materialism to the forefront of human
consciousness. Dialectical materialism and its statutory laws will
destroy the common law which will leave the people in charge with an
purely statutory system of laws that no one will have any basis to
criticize. No one will know how to question authority without the common
law yardstick from which to make judgements.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">Does
law come from authority or does authority come from law? In the West,
traditionally, law comes from reason and and authority comes from law.
Under dialectical materialism, law comes from authority.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
West is moving away from its traditional common law and toward a system
of statutory law based on Talmudic law. Noahide law will be the law for
all non Jews. The destruction of the common law, brought about with
dialectical materialism will get us there.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
Evangelicals are just as bad with their agenda and use of propaganda to
bring us closer to the rapture, but this is a different topic and their
propaganda is fundamentally different.</span></div>
<div class="ui_qtext_para">
<span style="font-size: large;">One
final thought: Most people casually throw around the idea that we in
the West live in democracies. This belief will get us closer and closer
to actual pure democracies. In reality, most of the West lives in
republics or constitutional democracy. Once full democracy is obtained,
despotism follows in short time. This is part of the PTB getting us to
forget the common law and our roots and the ideas that made the West
strong and free.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-71878663696494997192018-02-03T06:03:00.000-08:002018-02-03T06:03:10.114-08:00The Greatest Quote Ever<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
It needs no further comment. Its obvious:<br />
<br />
"Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or worse, when they are required to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."<br />
<br />
Theodore Dalrymple</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-62262878294189884352018-01-28T13:37:00.000-08:002018-01-28T13:37:48.379-08:00White Genocide: Why?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The following essay is an attempt to explain White Genocide is a slightly different manner the the one on this topic that I posted about a year ago.<br />
<br />
Before people adapt an ideal such as Equality, I want them to fully
understand what they are giving up. This essay is an effort to convey
this understanding, one that has taken me many years to obtain.<br />
<br />
It explains the fundamental reason for Christian White Genocide, which
is being done by communists as communists always do, as they always
have. There is a basic hatred and opposition of Western Christian
ideology that motivates communists. To explain this, I have to explain
the concept of law and what makes Western law, the law that is hated by
the communist, and why.<br />
<br />
Its a bit discombobulated, please bear with me. I'm watching this <a data-mce-href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80eJwvShspA" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80eJwvShspA" target="_blank">Alex Jones Youtube video</a>
and felt the urge to switch the title of this little project from
"Roman Law" to "White Genocide: Why?" and link it with this video.<br />
<br />
It is law that creates a society, without it, nothing else can be and
we live in an anarchy, like monkeys swinging from trees, maybe worse
because we have guns. No one sane would argue that you can have a good
society with bad laws.<br />
<br />
The Roman Empire grew because it
had developed laws. For a thousand or more years, all the best and
brightest went to Rome to study law. <em>The word "science" was first used in describing the fundamental nature of theoretical jurisprudence.</em><br />
<br />
Science did not emerge Newton or Bacon or Descarte, it originated with
the Romans and their work on laws. The age of reason started in Rome
with a science built around the common law. It didn't start with the
Enlightenment.<br />
<br />
The difference between this science and
the other hard sciences such as math and physics is not uncertainty. We
know when a law has been broken, without looking at code.<br />
<br />
Math and physics sit on hard principles which can be written in compact
form on paper, almost perfect abstractions (but people keep making them
better). Roman law sits on the pillar of the common law, the law which
cannot be written. Jesus Christ writes it as the one commandment of the
NT, Immanual Kant writes it as his categorical imperative. The Greeks
call it the "Golden Rule" because they couldn't write it down, so they
were probably smarter than everybody. Everyone knows it as "The Logos".<br />
<br />
Western law has been based on this precept. Mathematics requires
precepts such as counting and the shortest distance between two points
being a straight line being those from which all else is built. Law is
based on reason, like mathematics. Law requires a precept like
mathematics because reason does not create precepts on its own. To be a
science the laws developed from the precepts cannot be self
contradictory in math or law.<br />
<br />
By science, I do not mean
the scientific method, science here refers to logic and not application
of the scientific method. The Scientific Method doesn't work for math or
minefields and it doesn't work for law. This is the spiritual world, as
opposed to the material world, and the scientific method isn't part of
the spiritual world.<br />
<br />
Jurisprudence can never be exactly
right or exactly wrong in practice. The Golden Rule has some room for
interpretation. Justinian codified law so that Judgements would be less
dependent on the judge, a fundamental problem of jurisprudence, the
judge being well intentioned and well informed, or not. Justinian law
gets a bad rap, but law was not understood as well as it is today. Law
is a technology, just like any other. They had the old tube type
version, we have the digital version of the same thing.<br />
<br />
Another expression of the common law, America (United States is a corp)
is a Republic and the basic idea of a Republic is: "A nation by the
people, for the people and of the people" and is a well known Abraham
Lincoln quote, from which he got the idea from a very highly
respected German Scholar of Roman law and theorist, Von Savigny who
wrote law books in around mid 1800's. Much of his work is on the web as
free PDF's.<br />
<br />
Widespread knowledge of the law could be a serious threat to those who write and administer bad laws, but this is <strong>not</strong> why good laws must be written. <em>Good laws must be written to preserve the law, which in turn preserves freedom (Von Savigny)</em>.<br />
<br />
A law not based on sound principle would be like math adopting an axiom
along the lines of 2+2=5, people would just stop using math or stop
taking it seriously.<br />
<br />
The common law (which can be
partially expressed as all men being equal under the law) is being
replaced by another precept: equality of outcome. The two are not
compatible. Left wing nut case "equality" will destroy the Western
tradition of law.<br />
<br />
Plato explains exactly how this would
occur in book 4 of the Republic. Lawyers and legislators would be
tripping all over one another making a mess if the law as not based on
sound precepts. These must come from the Gods. In Rome the god was
Jupiter, who appeared the same for everyone. Jupiter saw all the farms
the same. This common law, as written in the New Testament forms the
basis for Western law.<br />
<br />
Kant explains that the law must be <strong><em>written</em></strong>, hence the need for the Bible.<br />
<br />
Von Savigny explains the application of the codified law and its
jurisdiction in his book, System of the Modern Roman Law, translated
from the German Friederich Von Savigny by William Holloway, vol 1, 1867.
On the subject of Jural Relations he writes: (S52)<br />
<br />
"The
essence of jural relation has been defined as a province of the
independent mastery of the individual will (S.52). Its our first matters
to search out the object-matters upon which the will can possibly
excercise influence and thus extend its mastery; hence a summary of the
different sorts of possible jural relations will of itself result.<br />
<em>
...Thus in the pure logical treatment of the question proposed, there
appear to us three main object matters for the mastery of the will;
hence, it would appear, that three main sorts of all jural relations
would of necessity be admitted. We have therefore next to examine those
object matters singly, and the first the individual person as object of a
special jural relation.</em><br />
<em> On this matter the following
view is very prevalent. Man, say some, has a right to his own self which
necessarily arises at his birth and can never cease so long as he
lives; for this precise reason it is called an ORIGINAL RIGHT...</em><br />
<em> ...If henceforth we entirely separate the so-called original rights and recognise the <strong>aquired rights as the only ones to which our further examination is to be directed</strong>, there will remain only two objects for the excercise of our will: unfree nature and extraneous persons."</em><br />
<br />
In extraneous persons he gets the law of obligations, from unfree nature, comes property.<br />
<br />
Von Savigny was a German and German law was quite a bit tilted toward
freedom than others. Kant is similar in basic thought. Von Savigny was
like a Kant, but for jurisprudence. Von Savigny follows the path of
reason proves his statements almost as well as Kant. (No wonder the
Globalists went after Germany the way it did.)<br />
<br />
BUT Von
Savigny is a philosopher in these books, not an actual judge. On that it
is Christ that explains this cornerstone. The building, its occupants
etc may change or burn down but the cornerstone will always remain for
those who wish to use it in future construction.<br />
<br />
We have
no lawyers, we must become lawyers. (A lawyer IS NOT synonymous with
attorney. If you don't believe me, ask one. I learned that from
attorneys before other sources.). There is a saying "only guilty people
hire attorneys" and its true. An attorney is merely a wealth transfer
agent and hiring one is to admit guilt by admitting that a wealth
transfer should take place.<br />
<br />
So, maybe for now, we lose
everything with the adoption of equality of outcome as an ideal because
we lose the foundation for our law, the very thing that makes us free.
Maybe we learn the law instead and decide to defend ourselves - really
scare the hell out of the establishment instead of having a talking head
just draining unfavorable parts of the swamp.<br />
<br />
Without
the Golden Rule as a yardstick, our rulers and legislators will make a
mess of everything, just as explained in Plato's Republic, even if they
have the best of intentions.<br />
<br />
For over two thousand years
the basic problem with communism has been well known, yet it rears its
head once again in the minds of a public that has no understanding of
its past or of its roots.<br />
<br />
Communism is with us once again in the genocide of these<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1su5jyNK0NA" target="_blank"> </a><a data-mce-href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1su5jyNK0NA" href="https://www.blogger.com/null">South African farmers</a>. We have not lost to this Bavarian conspiracy, we have good laws and we need to exercise them.<br />
See also <a data-mce-href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxSwtG0q0lA" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxSwtG0q0lA" target="_blank">White Genocide</a>.<br />
<br />
<strong>Note:</strong>
Many people think of the common law as that which is held to be in
common belief. What is held to be in common belief is really just a
practical application the the law which is common to all men. They are
one in the same thing, one a looser approximation of the other.<br />
<br />
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-452238198489618872016-10-30T02:14:00.000-07:002016-10-30T02:14:20.075-07:00A Psychiatrist Convention<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-size: large;">There is a story that I heard on YouTube last week, I've been telling
it to a few people. Some of them get it. So I'll tell it below and lets
see what everybody thinks.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Psychiatrists were at a convention and a paper was presented. It was not much of a paper but more of a complaint.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">
In it the doctor described how his practice had grown, how he was
understaffed and could not keep up with the workload. People were coming
in for the first time and he had to perform tests to determine if they
were crazy or not. Another psychiatrist during a question period
mentioned that he had the same problem, having to rent the office next
door for additional waiting room space for all of his new clients.
Others echoes his concern citing the well known fact that it takes
between forty and sixty man hours to properly evaluate a persons sanity.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> Then
one doctor stood up and explained that he had a small office in a
basement with no secretary and had a small waiting room consisting of a
few chairs and he was easily able to keep up with the workload, help his
patients and quickly determine their sanity. He explained that his
waiting room contained only a tap and in the corner, some old mops, and
some chairs.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> He said that when he came in
in the morning he would let everyone in, sit them down, then turn on
the tap in the corner and watch the waiting room from the window in his
office. Patients that turned off the tap were judged sane and the ones
that picked up a mop to known to be in need of help.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br data-mce-bogus="1" /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">
When we discuss politics in the conventional framework set forth by
mainstream media, wanting the Fed to adjust rates, changing social
policy, etc, we are using the mops to clean up a mess created by the
fact that we have Jewish money. The monster debt is really nothing but a
hoax. There is no possible promise that could back the promise that our
promisary notes use as backing. No consideration has ever taken place
between the Fed and the government, the Fed simply operates under its
own agenda with no oversight from the government, nor obligation to the
government (Alan Greenspan says this on YouTube so don't start calling
me an anti semite again)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> The only
possible solution to get us out of this mess is to turn off the tap and
recognize those folks who want to keep mopping the floor as nuts.
Political will and knowledge for monetary reform would get us monetary
reform. For people unfamiliar with the idea, see movies such as The
Money Masters on YouTube.</span></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-76128657932912833672016-10-17T17:31:00.000-07:002016-10-17T17:31:06.539-07:00Kant And The Misleading Frankfurt School<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The Eclipse Of
Reason by Adorno/Horkheimer a key founding document of the
Frankfurt
School and is an argument against Christianity done along the
lines
of Critical Philosophy. It does make a decent criticism of
Christianity based on it's subjective nature in its lawful
determinations. It is the subjective nature of Christianity that Judaism
stands against. Ideas like Jury's can prevent absolute power desired by
the Jews.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">A fundamental
aspect of
Christianity is it's reliance on conscience rather than absolute
law.
No man is without sin and no man made law is perfect.
Christianity
and English Jurisprudence created the jury, the conscience of
the
court, the Holy Ghost in the Trinity. Christinity's fundamental
doctrines protect us from tyranny. I explain the fundamentals
here
<a href="http://dougplumb.blogspot.ca/2016/10/why-are-christians-being-persecuted.html" target="_blank">"Why Are Christians Being Persecuted"</a> from Kant's work on religion).</span><br />
</div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span><br />
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Dr John Coleman
credits the great music critic, Theodore Adorno, with writing much of the
music we know as coming from the Rolling Stones and Beatles in
one
of his books on the socialist conspiracy for world domination.
Adorno
has certainly been a leading figure in the cultural changes
experienced over the past century.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The Eclipse Of
Reason criticizes modern society along the lines of it's subjective ethic. It does not
mention that it has been mostly Jew's that have lead us down this
path to "freedom". Christianity
takes the blame for everything that has gone wrong. The essay
suggests that a return to Neo-Thomism is the most likely
solution,
perhaps in this statement they are pointing us toward Noahide
laws. I
do not know what Neo Thomism is and cannot find a useful
definition
or book anywhere. Perhaps someone can enlighten me in the
comments,
it's been a "burning" question.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The essay, The Eclipse Of Reason, of
about
one hundred pages in length can be found on the web as a free
PDF.
Its sister document, the Dialectic Of Enlightenment is said by
the
Adorno/Horkheimer team to be the more academic version of the
same
statement. The Eclipse of Reason is by no means an easy read.
Anyone
that has doubts about a grand Jewish conspiracy should probably
read
the first ten or twenty pages of the Dialectic.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I enjoy
cautiously
reading Horkheimer & Adorno (they come as a pair, joined at
the
hip), the stuff is challenging and they do make some valid
points. It
becomes obvious that they view Kant as a serious threat to the
credibility of their project. I'm a follower of Kant and when I
read
it's usually Kant so I picked up a copy of Adorno's Critique of
Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason mostly to read some Critical
Philosophy for myself.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Kant is largely
unknown today or just remembered as part of the past, outshined
by
the likes of Berkeley, Hume, and Locke. In reality he is much
greater
than that, having redefined the problem of philosophy after
reading
his contemporaries, the most notable of which being Hume. Kant
is
likely one of the two most quoted philosophers in the history of
the
subject and is often quoted alongside Plato as being one of the
most
important thinkers to have ever lived. Schopenhauer is not the
only
one to have made this statement. Its been repeated often.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">His views on
space,
time and human ontological and epistemological perception forms
the
basis for his hypothesis that the world cannot exist as we see
it. The philosophical problem becomes one of perception.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Adorno's Critique
of
Kant is short, sharp and directly to the point in the first few
pages
but also fundamentally wrong. In these few pages of his Critique
against Kant he makes a very naive statement that Einstein's
relativity disproves the Kantian view on space and time,
effectively
discrediting the entire Kantian project on freedom itself. This
particular criticism is often echoed in online discussions that
I've
participated in whenever the works of Kant comes up by both
casual
readers and academics.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Kant's views seem
ridiculous to the first time reader and really only gradually
begin
to make sense on the second or third read. Kant himself even
re-wrote
it after some initial misunderstandings by his contemporaries.
Many
misunderstand him as a solipsist as I did on my first read. I
can't
really get into detail here without writing a hundred pages on
the
subject.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">In the early part
of
the last century Bertrand Russell wrote some very interesting
and
short books on various subjects, one being a qualitative
explanation
on Einsteins relativity. At the end of the book he does a chapter
on
Kant's view of space and time to caution the reader against
believing
that the theory of relativity either discredits or credits the
Kantian view (both arguments can be put forward with some
ground) .
This alone speaks to the importance of Kant. A reader of
Russell's
casual work was expected to be familiar with Kant's main body of work.
He
cautions the reader that these two views are quite unrelated,
one
being about perception and one being about reality. It is an
obvious
point to anyone that has studied Kant in detail, perhaps not so
obvious for many who only give Kant a cursory look.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It seems to me
that
a scholar such as Adorno, who quotes Kant regularly in his
works,
would not only be aware of the fallacy involved in his basic
critique
of Kant but would also go to great effort to discredit him,
given
the goals of the Frankfurt School. The work of this great
Christian
scholar falling by the waste side in modern thought is no
accident. It
is a fundamental work on freedom itself, one that will be
remembered
long after his contemporaries have been forgotten. Its no
surprise
that those who wish to assault freedom would attempt to
discredit
Kant in a deep and fundamental way, one that often holds some
water
in the minds of both casual readers and academics.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Kant explains
that
his view is subjective, we may look at the world as
materialistic in
conception or as if there is more to the world than science and
causality (cause and effect) itself. There is no penalty paid by science either
way.<i>
</i><i>There is no possible way of knowing</i>. Many people do
not
like Kant, but this fundamental notion put forward by Adorno is
incorrect and likely intentionally incorrect.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Two final notes:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(1) The Kantian ethic
sits on a subjective basis in the sense that we can choose
ethics and
morals rather than pure materialism. If this choice is made then
morals and ethics become logical and objective. They are are not
subjective in themselves. This is a key point as Kantian
subjectivity
is often used to undermine absolutes in his works.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(2) I would like
to
caution anyone considering reading Kant's opus magnus in that his Logic
notes by Wolfgang Schwarz and the recently published Routledge Guide by
Sabastian
Gardner are absolutely necessary prerequisites to reading Kant.
Gardner's work makes reading Kant actually possible for a non
academic such as myself. Garner has a YouTube talk on Kant.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">He
and
other modern scholars do attempt to discredit him in subtle
ways.</span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-11292098793228822042016-10-11T10:54:00.000-07:002018-06-19T07:54:14.804-07:00Why Are Christians Being Persecuted ?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<h3 style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Does law come from authority or does authority come from law?</span></h3>
</div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">I've been studying the New World Order for many years. I do this by reading philosophy, watching YouTube videos about true history and reading essays on sites such as www.henrymakow.com.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I believe that there is a developing race war and that it is meant to distract us from the true nature of
this conflict. In reality it is a religious war and this has been hidden behind the scenes of the media nonsense. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Jewish Hollywood depicts Jewish criminals as Christians in movies such as Eastern Promises or Amistad or in TV shows such as the Supranos. This creates an underlying belief that Christianity somehow permits these ideas and organizations when in fact real history shows that criminal organizations on the scale of international slavery and organized crime are mainly Jewish organizations. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Jewish slave traders are not sinners under Jewish law. Women captured and forced into brothels in Israel are victimized under Jewish law. This practice continues today as Jews push for compensation to blacks for slavery from white Americans. (hypocrisy) </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">See</span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrYzZ7r7CFI" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span class="watch-title" dir="ltr" id="eow-title" title="David Duke - Anti-White Propaganda and the Slave Trade"> David Duke - Anti-White Propaganda and the Slave Trade.</span></span></span></a><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span class="watch-title" dir="ltr" id="eow-title" title="David Duke - Anti-White Propaganda and the Slave Trade">(Anyone demonized in mainstream media and news is someone that deserves to be heard. Anyone incapable can be said to be immature, brainwashed, or both)</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Hollywood, the news media, the government, the money system, and the educational system are controlled by a small and largely secretive and closed ethnocentric group. They behave the way any small ethnocentric group would reasonably behave to preserve its own culture and people. Its well worth noting that multiculturalism is a Jewish idea that does not include Jews (more hypocrisy).</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Basic underlying ideas for a culture come from the philosophers, most of whom work in universities,
which are in turn now teaching mainly Jewish philosophy, and are
controlled by Jews. <i>"Impossible equality and arrested development"</i> - Winston Churchill.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Universities have nearly forgotten the great Christian
thinkers such as Immanuel Kant or C.S. Lewis. Kant and Lewis are
sources from which one can learn about Christianity in a greater
depth than perhaps what one can learn from a church sermon or by reading the
works by oneself, or by watching videos of sermons on the web, of which many are excellent.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
ideas of this essay, like my others, come in principle from the works
of Kant. I am not a great thinker and do not expect to have original
ideas. I fundamentally believe that most new ideas are intentionally bad ideas and are usually
Jewish ideas in the Jewish universe in which we live. </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Many people are unaware of the fact that laws in a country come from its adopted religion. Ideas that form law must have an immutable basis to prevent the law from being corrupted. Christian based societies have English Jurisprudence, itself based on Christianity. This guarantees that certain rights cannot be removed or trampled upon by any accuser of any accused. You would find many bibles in a Christian based court.Thou shalt not steal, etc are laws from which all man made laws are derived.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Judaism is statutory, a living law, and lives
from new ideas such as an ever expanding set of acts and statutes we
are to obey. It has no absolute truths other than Jewish Supremacy itself. Non Jews have no rights and Jewish males are incapable of sin under Jewish law. Christianity is built on a few universal core concepts that are outlined below. All men stand equal under the law in Christianity. Racism does not exist under Christian law.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">In a religion that has no absolute truth other than the supremacy of its own followers, law comes from authority. If a religion is built on a few universal core concepts, authority operates under these concepts and authority comes from law. </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Christians
are being massacred all over the world, and have been over this past
century. World war two was a Christian war. It was mostly Christians
killing Christians. Only the banks and Israel can be truly said to
have won the second world war. Ground zero for one of the bombs
dropped on Japan was Japan's largest Christian church.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">In
the Bolshevik Revolution, up to sixty million Christians were killed,
often by torture that lasted days, or even weeks. They were the
victims of psychological experiments resulting in death. </span>
</div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
media war on Christianity, the founding principles of Western
society, has turned most people into atheists. Atheists have no doctrine from to create law and must turn to Progressivism. Progressivism is an idea that the most intelligent of men should lead mankind. Its a stupid idea because they have the greatest capacity for evil, as explained in The Republic Of Plato. Progressivism is really a new Bolshevism.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Christianity
is a doctrine that stands in direct opposition to a new world
government. The Old Testament warns of it in the story of the Tower
of Babylon. We live in a society that is building this tower and the
tower is nearly complete. When complete, it will result in the
complete subjugation of all of both Jews and non-Jews under different
sets of laws.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">There
are three fundamental doctrines of Christianity that are in opposition
to the New World Order which has lead to Christians being persecuted.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Jesus
Christ said, in the New Testament, that his people perished from lack
of knowledge. Modern churches are not teaching Christian doctrine, at
least not the ones I have been in. Preachers on the internet and in
YouTube videos are not teaching basic tenets of Christian doctrine. I
learned them from Immanual Kant, mostly in his
book, Religion Within The Boundaries Of Mere Reason. It is the only
source I know of that one can learn Christian doctrine in a concise
and logical form.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Many
people forget that the Bible is a law book.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">1. Eating From The Tree Of
Knowledge</span></h3>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></h3>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Knowledge
refers to knowledge of good and evil. Knowledge of good and evil is
the knowledge of law. To eat from the tree of knowledge is to use the
letter rather than the spirit of the law. Courts do this, jury's are
supposed to be aware but courts are not required to educate jury’s
and often instruct juries directly to judge from the letter rather
than the spirit of the law. This is why the courts seem so corrupt.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">2. Separation Of Powers</span></h3>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></h3>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">This
is an idea that prevents conflicts of interest. The NT is a book of
parables and it explains this as mixing water with wine. In this case
mans laws and God's laws are mixed in lawful Holy matrimony. One of
the disciples asks Christ about mixing water with wine at a wedding.
The wine is the law of God, the water is the law of man. The law of
man is necessary for commerce. Sometimes mixing these two is
necessary such as in the case of marriage.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">One
cannot serve both God and Mammon, Mammon being the material world and
man. In the case of holy matrimony this is necessary but does not
create a conflict of interest.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">In
earlier times in Western societies, a young man, after graduating
school, would have to decide as to whether to spend his life in the
public or the private domain. The public domain offered rewards of
spirit, doing the right thing. The private life, working in the
private sector, offered material rewards. They were separate worlds
and this system kept corruption at bay.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">3. The Holy Trinity</span></h3>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></h3>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">This
doctrine is hated more than any and is completely misunderstood
leading to silly debates about one thing being three things at once.
This is a classic straw-man attack. The father, the son and the holy
ghost is simply this: The father is the law giver, God. The son is
reason and forgiveness, the holy ghost is conscience.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">It
is manifested in Christian societies in courts as the prosecutor,
defense attorney and jury. Noahide courts in the new world order will
not permit defense attorneys or juries. The idea must be erased from
the public mind.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Juries
prevent the courts from eating from the tree of knowledge, sending an
innocent man to jail on the letter of the law. Juries have jury nullification which permits them not only to consider guilt or innocence, but also if the law itself applies in the given trial. Both the law and the accused are on trial. Power is always being questioned and examined.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
three branches of government, legislative, judicial and executive
also manifest the Trinity in structure as well as separation of
powers in structure.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Ideas
such as public-private partnerships undermine this structure.
Legislation, particularly around vaccines, is bought and paid for.
This is one example of mixing the public with private. Another one is
war. Private corporations make enormous profit from war and therefor
lobby for defense spending. Armies must be exercised.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<h3 align="center" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Conclusions</span></h3>
<h3 align="center" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></h3>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;">Christian
doctrine represents the biggest threat to the Judaic New World Order
tyrannical government.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">These
Christian doctrines prevent the formation and execution of a
tyrannical government, the very thing that the New World Order
requires. The New World Order is Jewish, this can be proven by the
fact that Jews control the world of ideas as well as the material
world. The idea would not be brought forward without Jewish
permission. This small ethnocentric group controls reality because
Christians have not been taught their doctrines.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
New World government will have two sets of laws, Talmudic Statutes
for Jews and Noahide law for those who serve them. Both sets of laws
are tyrannical in nature, the judges being trained in Israel by the
Sanhedrin Priesthood. Both sets of laws will be administered by
tyrants. Both Jews and non Jews will not have a defense against
accusations. Double jeopardy will no longer hold and persecution will
be at the sole discretion of centralized power, itself the very
source of corruption. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. As in the Bolshevik Revolution one can be taken to court over and over again under the same accusation until a conviction is obtained.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">To
imagine how people may be treated we can look at how Jews are treated
now. They live in fear due to the false religion of holocaustianity. </span>
</div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Non
Jews are being murdered wholesale such as in Palestine. If Jews get
to the level of overtly rule rather than covert rule, we have every
reason to believe that the world will look very much like Palestine
does today. </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>"Even
the best of the Goyim deserve to be killed"</i> </span></div>
<div align="center" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">-
Babylonian Talmud. </span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEir2MyyI_iPpJ97LZEuu5v_6OWVRt85ntTfik5fWCfs3yjz8EWes5awG63XT4AIXtZGOyJ2UDgFHIvb8vOh4Ns0ndftbulcZ_twKOU4VA1SI6C3YTjCsW2xQNBS1RGFOgKjNfp85G4nJhU/s1600/main-image-rally-TA.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEir2MyyI_iPpJ97LZEuu5v_6OWVRt85ntTfik5fWCfs3yjz8EWes5awG63XT4AIXtZGOyJ2UDgFHIvb8vOh4Ns0ndftbulcZ_twKOU4VA1SI6C3YTjCsW2xQNBS1RGFOgKjNfp85G4nJhU/s320/main-image-rally-TA.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Jews advocating the killing of all Palestinians </b></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">If
we learn Christian doctrine, and demand it, we can stop the New World Order and
return to sanity. Sanity occurs when fact and right rule over
feelings and when people do not suffer from lack of knowledge.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Finally, to confirm what I have said in the above essay, I have this video of Jewish Intellectual </span><span style="font-size: large;">Yossi Gurvitz revealing the grim truth behind the ancient Jewish
strategy of playing nice and friendly as long as Jews are in a
relatively weak position but of being totally without mercy “when Israel
is mighty.” </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /> </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dyQxG3EcPhzkx4Hp2xEI0p-rpySDtsw7ypjjXpZu2-2rg2mDL3jsKFR5b38XGxAVOFXHXbye3R6Ug8V0G-F' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /> </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-72279896525631565102016-10-10T08:41:00.003-07:002016-12-09T07:05:24.751-08:00Why Did Jews Fake The Holocaust ?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div align="center">
<span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>If
you, gentle reader, cannot read objective fact without being
offended, then you are immature, brainwashed, or both.</b></i></span><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span>
</div>
<h3 align="center" class="western">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Jewish
Hypocrisy</span></h3>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Before
examining this question, we must first evaluate its possibility. Does
Judaism permit Jews to lie, cheat and steal from the Goyim (non
Jews)? Often times an argument will be created that is based on an
absurdity at the outset. This technique is often used and non
critical thinkers accept an absurdity and the rest of the statement
makes sense as long as the initial premise remains unquestioned. This
technique is used regularly in Jewish controlled media.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Judaism
not only permits lying to and cheating of the Goyim, it encourages
this. The Jewish Talmud is a Rabbinical interpretation of the Jewish
Bible, the first five books of the Old Testament. You can look up
Talmudic quotes on a search engine or look up videos about the Talmud
online. It consists of about thirty volumes so you can't read the
whole thing. It is a mortal sin for a Jew to expose the Talmud to the
Goyim. Fortunately for us, there are many great people that are
Jewish and they have exposed Judaism for what it truly is.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="http://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Talmud
Quotes</span></span></a><span style="color: black;"> </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">(These
can be verified by downloading a PDF version of the Talmud from
various places. These links are constantly being removed and
replaced.)</span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Jews
consider themselves the chosen people of God. On Sunday, God rested
and it's up to the Jews to finish the job as one Jewish woman
explained to me. She is a social justice warrior and considers
herself highly intelligent so I guess I'll take her word for it. This
is the ideology of a supremist.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Members
of the Jewish religion and race consider themselves superior to
everyone else and have a mandate from God to fix the world. Some
things cannot be fixed and must be torn down. Western culture is
being erased with nihilism. Young people that graduate university are
being filled with vanity and propagandized to go along with the
agenda, as if they too are superior. Vanity is the favorite sin of
the devil and the favorite tool of pick-up artists. Intelligent
people are not immune to the illusions created by the magician.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Without
any facts, these ideologies alone, which can be verified in Jewish
writings as well as the Talmud, should scare the hell out of you.
Judaism is nothing like Christianity and empirically speaking, the
Judea-Christian ethic is simply a Christian society run by Jews under
the ideology of Jewish Supremacy.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">The
white countries around the world are in terrible shape, the education
is bad, the media lies about everything, the economy's are failing,
Western countries are at war and their forces occupy over 150
countries to protect Jewish banks and the money is corrupt. All of
the governing institutions in Western countries are overwhelmingly
controlled by Jews.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Although
Jews are the main force behind multiculturalism, they also believe in
strict racial integrity for themselves. There are always one set of
rules for Jews and another set for everyone else under Jewish
tutelage. Hypocrisy is certainly a sign of evil. It is a particularly
virulent form of evil. Double standards rein throughout Judaic rule.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Barbara
Lerner Spectre on Multiculturalism in Europe</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Jewish
apologists and philosophers such as Stefan Molyneux state that the
higher average Jewish intelligence would explain disproprtionate
numbers of Jews in powerful positions. If the IQ tests and results
hold water, there should still be a significantly greater number of
highly intelligent White non Jews. Mathematics is not a strong point
for many and there are lies, damned lies and statistics.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">The
movement toward political anarchy is also largely Jewish. In my
movie, "Law, The Light Of Reason And Conscience" I explain
why anarchy creates a society of savages. I also explain the
importance religion has in making the laws that govern a country.
This is the science of Jurisprudence and is relevant even if you are
an atheist. You may be an atheist but the courts cannot be. <i>"There
are things we know, things we don't know and things we don't know we
don't know"</i> - Donald Rumsfeld.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">The Holocaust Facts</span></h3>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Historical
records show that there were about 4.5 million Jews in Greater
Germany just before World War 2. Supposedly six million Jews died,
but the Jewish encyclopedia shows a Jewish population unchanging as a
result of the war. All other races declined in population. The world
Jewish population went from 15+ million before the war to 15 million
+ after the war. Where is all the survivors come from? Where did all
those people that moved into Palestine come from? Did Jews and their
banks that financed World War 2 really win that war ? If anyone else
won, what did they win ?</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/the-holocaust-6-million-lie-population-of-jews-1938-15-748-million-1948-15-753-million/">World
Population Records</a> (photocopies of books) </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Many
historians have shown that the NAZI's (National Socialist / Zionist
International) could not have carried out the killing of six million
people with the infrastructure that they had. The "gas chambers"
were not gas chambers, they were delousing facilities for clothing.
The camps had theaters, swimming pools, etc. The holocaust death
figures have gone up from just under 300,000 Jews and non Jews to 6
million Jews over time. (Zionists, by definition, believe that Jews
have a God given right to live in and rule Israel)</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMyoEG2c7a0"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Gas
chambers were not actually gas chambers</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/shocking-new-holocaust-study-claims-nazis-killed-up-to-20-million-people-2013-3"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
Holocaust death toll is growing daily</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2015/11/02/international-red-cross-report-confirms-the-myth-of-the-holocaust-six-million/"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Red
Cross figures</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY90MSkQtrE"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Benjamin
Freedman on the growing holocaust count</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">The
holocaust prevents people from asking questions about Judaism,
everyone feels bad <i>"those poor people, look what happened to
them"</i>. The Jews explain questioning Judaism as persecution
by labeling those who question Jewish Supremism as White Supremists.
They convince the lowest common denominator of society from hearing
what the so-called "white supremists" say about Jewish
Supremism. </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Jews
have been booted out of over 100 countries throughout known history.
In some countries they were even let back in then kicked out again.
Some Jews explain this by jealousy of their superior intelligence and
business sense. All countries need a class of people that fit this
description to have a competitive economy. </span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Few
people realize that International Judaism went to war with Germany
with a boycott of German made goods in 1933, when other Western
Countries declared chapter 11 bankruptcy under Jewish banks.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/165i0dicryJ_KtzCr6agR6O6v4XaRM2EDr6f1WbmU3Fg/edit?hl=en">USA
declares bankruptcy in 1933</a>. (Many Western nations declared
bankruptcy in 1933, leading them to Judaic (communist) rule)</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.google.ca/search?q=NY+Times+Judea+Declares+War+on+Germany%21&safe=off&hl=en-CA&gbv=2&biw=1602&bih=945&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiav-zWptDPAhXHx4MKHYKZB7cQ_AUIBigB">International
Judaism declares war on Germany</a> (Images of newspapers
containing headline)</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">No
one can deny that Jews covertly run the world. To imagine what life
would be like if they achieved an overt world government, we only
need to look at Palestine. Not only is Palestine theirs, but the
world is theirs as well. They are the chosen people of God, they tell
you. The bible doesn't really say this, Christians were given the
Scofield study bible to convince them that Jews are the chosen
people. In reality, Christians are the chosen people, the Israelites,
and we have created most of the great societies throughout the world.
Almost any country that people would want to live was essentially
made by Christians.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clfsOJ8V3Mc"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Who
is Israel?</span></span></a></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Why
Lie About The Holocaust?</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></h3>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Jews
wish to destroy every race that is non Jewish and subjugate them to
Jewish rule. Christianity is first on the list. The media is being
used to manipulate people into hating white Christians. Christianity
is a religion that operates against authoritarian rule with its
fundamental doctrines of the Trinity, Separation Of Powers and the
Tree Of Knowledge. Not many sources explain these concepts correctly
and many people get them wrong. I explain these concepts in my
YouTube video, <i>"Law, The Light Of Reason and Conscience"</i>.
Aided by the philosophy of Immanuel Kant I explain the role that law,
science and religion play in society.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5qejJS_mk8&list=PLG8lPvm-TWKFbVojQ2s4Of22H8kI5Wxvb">Jewish
war on whites</a> </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC58U9eUdSsFF8GuWLPzgSag">Mychannel</a>
(contains many links + </span><span style="font-size: medium;"><i>"Law,
The Light Of Reason And Conscience"</i></span><span style="font-size: medium;">)</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">The
Jewish holocaust was not the only instance of racial genocide in
history. The Russian Bolshevik revolution killed sixty million
Christians and burned down or destroyed almost all of the Christian
churches. This was a Wall St Banker lead Jewish Revolution. Recently
Christians and others in Africa have experienced mass Genocide,
Rwanda and Whites in South Africa. No one questions these realities.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">There
is no business like Shoa business. Not only does the holocaust give
Jews permission to take over society without questions being asked,
it also makes them billions of dollars. Western countries pay
holocaust reparation fees. People too young to have ever participated
in the holocaust pay the Jews for the holocaust. Germany gave them a
nuclear submarine. The holocaust is mentioned regularly in Western
newspapers even today. In the last two months I have seen it in the
Canadian Globe And Mail and Toronto Star. Why aren't white Christians
being compensated for the Jewish Revolution in Russia, how about
those Rwandans ? They do not matter, they are not Gods chosen people.
Those mass killings of the Goyim can be forgotten by the Jewish
controlled press and education system.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Countless
Jews blame white people for black slavery, but this is the Jewish
version of history that you see on Jewish media, learn from Jewish
controlled education, and read in books published by the Jewish
controlled publishing industry. In real history, black slavery was a
Jewish institution.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yWCzTQemI4">Truth
about the Jewish run Black slave trade</a> (one of many links on this
topic) </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tfDcyODfUw"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jews
and Slavery</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">How
could a people pull off such a diabolical hoax ? Jews call it
Chutzpa. Why would they do this ? It helps enforce their double
standard and sense of superiority as well as make them billions of
dollars. When have they done this? The six million figure has been
used many times before WW2 to gain sympathy for the Jews and to give
them power for their agenda of world domination.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
six million used prior to ww2 in newspapers</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Who
among the Jews has been doing this? Not all Jews are a part of all
this. Research Judaism and you find people like <a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/">Henry
Makow</a> and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/zionget">Brother
Nathaniel</a> (see YouTube) as well as many others. They are the best
sources regarding Judaism because they were Jews and have since
converted.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtlPlZGvgY0"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
holocaust stories you didn't hear.</span></span></a></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"> </span></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western">
Am I being Objective ?
</h3>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">
</span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">It
is impossible to be completely objective using history and current
events. These are empirical and cannot lead to any absolute truth,
only opinions. We all have lenses from which we see reality and these
are colored and warped from our own experiences and prejudices. All
thinking people discriminate and have prejudice. Stupid people have
none because they do not think.<br /><br />If truth cannot be discerned
from empirical experience, how do we find it? Do we look to
authority? Do we need to determine absolute truth?<br /><br />To be truly
and absolutely objective about the holocaust and the subsequent
holocaust reparation fees, we may look at it from the perspective of
Christian English Jurisprudence and say some things that are
absolutely true.<br /><br />(1) The requirements of </span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><u><b>Habeas
Corpus</b></u></i></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
has never been met by those charging not only the Germans, but
Canadians and Americans as well as others for the crime of the
holocaust. ( You are being charged when you pay reparation fees.
Being charged in a court of law doesn't mean anything different than
being charged for a tank of gas. Courts operate on money and
charges)<br /><br />(2) No </span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><u><b>motive</b></u></i></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
has ever been shown.<br /><br />These are absolute facts and they pertain
to the law.<br /><br />These are basic requirements of a court based on
Christian English Jurisprudence, these requirements were not met by
our accusers but we still pay for the holocaust. For that, it must be
that our courts do not operate according to English Jurisprudence.
Our courts are slowly being metamorphosed into Talmudic courts. Only
if the owners of the private banks that fund our government and take
our income taxes expected to be judged by Talmudic rather than
Christian law, could this organization and its theft exist.</span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<h3 align="center" class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">What Can We Do?</span></h3>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">What
can you do? Politics has become a taboo subject. Talking about it
offends people and the social justice movement, created by the Jews,
creates a class of people that place feeling above fact. Adults use
objective reason and children judge by feelings. The world is
ultimately governed by political will: change political will and you
help change the world. We change political will by talking about the
truth. This holocaust has given Jews a license to change the world
into one governed by Jews. Most people will not survive a world
governed by Jews, understanding creates a need for political action.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><br />The
Jewish expectation is for people to change to being Noahides, people
that are permitted to live to serve the Jew. There is no reason for
anyone to live unless they serve the Jew under Jewish law. You agree
to be their slaves or be decapitated under Noahide laws. Many people
believe that the Noahide laws are ideal human laws because they read
them and do not look for definitions of terms. Non Jews are not human
under Noahide and all these laws written to protect humans are only
there to protect Jews. Noahide creates only obligation and no right.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><br />Jews
hate Christianity because of the Trinity. The trinity is trial by
jury rather than authoritarian rule. The Trinity is: God (The Law
Giver) The Son (Reason) and the Holy Ghost (Conscience). These
correspond to the prosecutor, defense and jury. No law or man is
perfect and Christian courts require informed juries, ones that know
what "Jury Nullification" means, although the Jewish courts
do not require juries to know this. Both Muslims and Jews want
authoritarian rule without responsibility. Christianity stands
against authoritarian rule, it prevents absolute power from
dominating society. People have rights under Christianity.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><br />Too
many Christians fail to understand their religion and the fact that
Christianity is the basis for English Jurisprudence. Multiculturalism
dilutes Christianity and foreigners will tend to vote along the lines
of authoritarian rule.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuFzAvg9iW0">How
Much Do Jews Hate?</a> (a little Jewish TV) </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">You
will lose friends, family members, maybe even jobs, but the
alternative is far worse. The alternative is an empty replacement of
happiness with pleasure across all culture, and a not so kind ending.</span></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">We
are being <i>Jewed</i>. Ordinary Jews are being Jewed, the holocaust
creates a culture of fear and fear makes people more susceptible to
propaganda [Jaques Ellul, Propapaganda...]. Be afraid of this, not
phoney global warming, alien attacks, fake terrorism, or anything
else not having to do with this. It's all a distraction and the
lowest common denominator have the greatest numbers and they
determine political reality. </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;">Fear
is the tool of the NWO, it is the tool of propagandists. </span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI">Harold
Rosenthal Interview</a> </span>
</div>
<div style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-79112948571932163662016-08-27T02:57:00.000-07:002017-01-22T03:03:49.221-08:00Law, The Light Of Reason And Conscience<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-size: large;">The video below explains in precise ways exactly why government is corrupted. The basic reason is the structure of government being changed from a Christian based structure to a materialist basis in structure. This stuff is a little bit complicated, so it doesn't often get explained in ten minute YouTube videos.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Most of this stuff is what a high school graduate would know a hundred years ago. Its based on the Bible, works of Immanual Kant and other Enlightenment philosophers, the early Greeks, research I have done reading the Jewish philosophers, and the history and ideals of Bolshevism.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">It took me about fifteen years to learn this. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">I managed to shrink the complete explanation down to two hours and forty minutes, in ten sections:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<a href="https://youtu.be/uipc3TTYiYc?list=PLG8lPvm-TWKFGZ2WbBMAJDxdpnLTPy8qN" target="_blank">Law, The Light Of Reason And Conscience Full Playlist</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">There are some snippet sections listed on a Playlist here:</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5G0sQyglhE&list=PLG8lPvm-TWKFPxzkrkrbnJB19Kpe2r4Lf" target="_blank"> Law, The Light Of Reason And Conscience Snippet Playlist</a></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-45589082159245537462015-12-04T05:40:00.002-08:002016-01-10T06:42:04.912-08:0020 Indisputable Facts<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-size: large;">I was never able to write this until now. I recently found an English copy of the Talmud. The Talmud is the highest book of Jewry. I have read through some of its nine thousand pages and learned much. I know enough now where I can state things about the world and about organized Jewry and Christian Zionism.The quotes from the Talmud posted on the web are all true. Look up Talmud quotes, text search a PDF copy of the Talmud in English. (its nine thousand pages in total) See video's <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9jiokw1aLY" target="_blank">Talmud Law in English Courts</a>, </span><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY" target="_blank"><span style="color: #660000;">Testimony of Yossi Gurvitz, July 15, 2012</span></a> See <a href="http://talmudical.blogspot.ca/">http://talmudical.blogspot.ca/</a> </span><br />
<div class="ytp-html5-clipboard">
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 1. <b><u>Adults use objective reason and fact to make judgements. Children do what is best for themselves and are easily duped by opinion. Growing up is when we learn this. Discipline is when we apply this to govern our lives.</u></b> Adults believe only those who take responsibility for their words. Children can be fooled by anyone that "sounds reasonable".</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 2. The world is run by the printers of the money. These banks are owned by Jews. You can check this by looking up a government report called the Grace Report, commissioned by Regan. (That's why they shot him.) The money powers have always been the ones to assassinate US presidents. See the free online documentary called "The Money Masters". It explains everything I say about the banks in a magnificent three hour documentary on the history of money. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRduwYgrU7A" target="_blank">See Ron Paul on youtube</a> on responsibility of the Fed. See also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlrjVhpdoso" target="_blank">The Money Masters</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 3. The UN is owned and operated by the Big Banks. Rockefeller donated eight million dollars in property value for the construction of the UN. Rockefeller isn't publically Jewish, he may not be, but he is surrounded by them. You can see this by researching the names of the owners of the Federal Reserve Bank in the Grace Commission Report as well as many others sources. See also The Money Masters. </span><span style="font-size: large;"><i>"100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt ... all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government." </i>-Grace Commission report submitted to President Ronald Reagan - January 15, 1984 (Links for this get broken all the time, new ones appear)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 4: If the UN is owned by the banks, its organizations such as the IPCC are controlled by the banks. Other government organizations such as NASA are also controlled organizations, because they are government organizations. The media is mostly controlled by Jews. This is what Hitler meant when he is quoted as explaining how the people are so easily manipulated by simple repetition. He was being descriptive, not prescriptive. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">“It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a
psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in
fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they
clothe ideas and disguise.” (<a href="https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/281832.Joseph_Goebbels">https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/281832.Joseph_Goebbels</a>) See <a href="https://archive.org/details/ConfessionsOfAnEconomicHitman_257" target="_blank">Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man</a> (free) , also see (free) <a href="https://archive.org/details/TheFearfulMaster" target="_blank">Fearful Master</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 5: The UN IPCC, as well as other UN organizations have been caught numerous times fudging data. Their models have never predicted reality. You can look up countless youtube videos of actual climate experts explaining this. You can hear them speaking and see their lips moving. The information they give is unfiltered by corporate interests and is the most reliable available today because it is raw and unfiltered. <u><b>Science requires that both the data and the mathematical models used to draw conclusion are exposed for criticism. Bullshit occurs when results are shown without supporting math and data. <i>Bullshit is not science. </i>The IPCC and other government "scientific" organizations do not publish their math models. Therefore they are practicing bullshit, not science. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=global+warming+hoax+explained">https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=global+warming+hoax+explained</a></b></u></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 6: <b><u>Both political Zionist Jews as well as orthodox Jews absolutely hate all of the rest of humanity, with a burning passion.</u></b> They are in fact racists. You can download an English copy of the Talmud and do text searches on words like "Goyim", "Nine Year Old", "Three Year Old". They believe themselves entitled to rape, rob and kill the rest of humanity because they are the chosen people. The Talmud is the top book of the Jews. They claim that even God goes to the Talmud for guidance in the Talmud. They study the Talmud and punish any Jew that exposes it to the Goyim (you and me). <b><u>In the Talmud it states that the only reason for the Goyim to live is to serve the Jew. You can see Jews explain this on youtube - unfiltered by corporate media.</u></b> You can see their lips moving as they speak so you know its them really saying it. More reliable than National Geographic, Time Magazine and all the TV channels combined, who speak mostly from rumor (filtered expert statements). <a href="https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=talmud+exposed">https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=talmud+exposed</a> Also see <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MYPzKNQUE0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MYPzKNQUE0</a> to hear what famous people in history say about the Jews. See <a href="https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Talmud">https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Talmud</a> See also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jewish+rabbi+speaking+the+truth">https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jewish+rabbi+speaking+the+truth.</a></span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv8_0j5b5LobVFHFu1rl7xcrfUN5O08eNiBMMcQk-E0xB73jKnngrbX24ml4Y6OBPIMYf89I8-gujbNhpuf1RQ3vpe6Z0daQYqPDr3jfhqJTleUVLXWd-_1Si3103R_RKJzvksswfjRos/s1600/israeli-pm-calls-jews-the-22master-race22.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="220" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv8_0j5b5LobVFHFu1rl7xcrfUN5O08eNiBMMcQk-E0xB73jKnngrbX24ml4Y6OBPIMYf89I8-gujbNhpuf1RQ3vpe6Z0daQYqPDr3jfhqJTleUVLXWd-_1Si3103R_RKJzvksswfjRos/s320/israeli-pm-calls-jews-the-22master-race22.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"> Also see</span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span class="watch-title " dir="ltr" id="eow-title" title="Hard to believe how bad Chabad hates non-Jews"> "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjJRzgR_biI" target="_blank">Hard to believe how bad Chabad hates non-Jews</a>".
</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 7:<b> <u>Most of the people that have been exposing Jewry have been Jews. They have gone to jail for this. They are the very best of what humanity has to offer.</u></b> They stand for your rights and nothing else. People like Henry Makow and Brother Nathaniel are only two of hundreds, maybe thousands, proving and exposing truth. Many Jews are afraid of their religion and afraid to speak out. Many Jews fought for Hitler. Many Jews have exposed the holocaust as a fraud. Many believe Hitler was a dupe for the Jews to create Israel and put the Allied nations into debt to better serve the Jew. <a href="http://henrymakow.com/2013/07/hitler-played-the-dupe-in-ww2.html">http://henrymakow.com/2013/07/hitler-played-the-dupe-in-ww2.html</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 8: <b><u>Our Christian nations no longer operate by Christian law.</u></b> Christian law forbids robbery. Your "income tax" is something you pay because you are tricked into claiming your wage labour as income by the Jews who own the private revenue collection agencies such as the IRS (they look like government organizations but if you phone them (as I did) and ask them they will tell you the truth !!!). Only Talmudic law permits robbery. The income tax does not go to the governments, it goes to the banks as interest on a debt created from thin air. It pays for all the wars. Look up "IRS agent income tax" on youtube. Hear the agents for yourself, see their lips move as they form their words - unfiltered by corporate media. Look up Joe Bannister or Sherry Jackson, both ex IRS agents on youtube. See <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E4E8R4PS-A">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E4E8R4PS-A</a> (Sherry Jackson) <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKePl2gW_3M">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKePl2gW_3M</a> (Joe Bannister)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 9: Muslims hate Christians because Christians are easily duped into being donkeys for the Jew. <b><u>Many Christians believe that the Jews are the chosen people and so therefore, by extention, must believe that Jews have a fundamental right to rape, rob and murder all non Jews. </u></b> Jewish doctrine is to create disciples meaner than they are. It's in the Talmud. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=holocaust+revisionist+documentary" target="_blank">The holocaust didn't happen.</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 10:<u><b> Global warming is the best vehicle to rob and subjugate mankind. It robs us economically and provides motivation for world depopulation.</b></u> Every Jew shall have twenty slaves (text search your copy of the Talmud for the word "twenty"). This is Talmudic Law. The AGW hypothesis is the best motivation for writing laws to subjugate humanity. Eliminating fossil fuels will be (1) bad for the environment (www.petitionproject.org) (2) Cause billions of Goyim to starve. (3) Farming is done by tractors and machinery which use fossil fuels. Food depends on fossil fuels. See <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82W41de4TT4">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82W41de4TT4</a> (Stephan Molyneaux and Alex Epstein)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 11: <u><b>The vast majority of world scientists are saying that Climate Change is a fraud. Only a very few support it and they are constantly repeated in the media.</b></u> Jewish controlled media does not expose the greater, more scientific opinion that it is in fact pure 100% fraud. You can see this at www.petitionproject.org as a signed and mailed in statement by over 32,000 scientific people from only the USA. Imagine how many would say this in the entire world. How many scientists have you heard stating the AGW hypothesis as fact without media filtering and with responsibility ? See <a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/" target="_blank">PetitionProject</a><a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/" target="_blank"></a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Can the media be trusted? <a href="https://www.facebook.com/daniel.j.dorey/videos/10152634322476143/" target="_blank">For fun</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 12: Whether you believe in God or not, all Laws come from theology. Acts are acts of man, but acts are not laws. This is also a fact of law. The reason for this is that man's laws multiply and balloon into something unmanageable. Its explained in The Republic Of Plato. Your personal beliefs are irrelevant to this fact, as they are for all other facts- remember Fact 1.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 13:<b> <u>If you are listening to opinion rather than researching fact, you are an idiot.</u></b> If you get your information from government or corporate sources, you are getting opinions because they carefully obfuscate responsibility for their word.<b><u><br /></u></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 14: The New World Order is getting meaner. Its going to get a lot meaner if we don't do something. From Chem-trails, trade deals that will collapse and already injured and dying economy, to GMO foods, mandated vaccines, and more wars things are getting worse, not better.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 15: Syria doesn't have a central bank and it doesn't have "Free"masons. Syria was a country listed in the Pentagon document "Plan for the New American Century" (<a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf" target="_blank">PNAC</a>) See <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIiwl8pMgW0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIiwl8pMgW0</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 16:<b><u> Doing an act of terror feeds the machine and creates a need for a bigger police state. If you want to build a bomb or commit an act of terror, join the FBI, CIA, NSA, etc, go fight in a Zionist war. At least get paid for it.</u></b> All acts of terror from 9-11 to the underwear bomber have been shown to be "inside jobs". <b><u><br /></u></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 17: Communism is a creation of the Jews. Research this on HenryMakow.com. Communists always want to take the guns and do mass population culling. See <a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/russians-learned-gun-control-lesson.html">http://www.henrymakow.com/russians-learned-gun-control-lesson.html</a> <b><u> </u></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Fact 18: Public opinion rules the world. It always has and it always will. </b></u></span></span>If we immersed ourselves in verifiable, objective fact, we would live better and deserve to live better. If we continue to be guided by the opinion of government, and government funded organizations, most of us will die. The rest will be subjugated further by Jews. (Do not repeat opinion, use your mind, spread facts). </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 19: This is only a small number of facts that clearly show where the world is going. For instance, another fact is that 9-11 was never investigated. NIST is not an investigative body. The fire marshal was not allowed to investigate 9-11. They are an investigative body. <u><b>Calling NIST to do a fire investigation is like calling a plumber to fix a light switch.</b></u></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Fact 20:<b> <u>If you choose not to do something about this then you will deserve it.</u></b>
If you cannot stand up for yourself and yours, why should anyone else ?
If you do not stand for what is right, why should you deserve any
consideration for what is right by others ?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Finally, something to look at, right from the "horses mouth", <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.J.RES.104.ENR:" target="_blank">Education Day</a>. The Noahide Laws are not mentioned in the Bible but part of an oral tradition handed down by Jewry in their highest book, the Talmud. There is no reason for the Goyim to live except to serve the Jew. Adopting the Noahide laws makes the Goyim righteous in the eyes of the Jew. Jew's do not follow Noahide Laws. They follow the 613 laws of the Jew explained in the Talmud. Two different people, two different laws. It is unlawful for the Jew to kill the non Jew, but the crime has no punishment.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Much of how our current state is run can be explained in <a href="http://www.threeworldwars.com/protocols.htm" target="_blank">The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion</a>. Initially this was said to be faked, but history shows otherwise. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">See also </span><a href="http://www.antichristconspiracy.com/HTML%20Pages/Harold_Wallace_Rosenthal_Interview_1976.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976 </span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></span><br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span></span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: large;">It is not surprising that <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEJ0UUIaxF0" target="_blank">this video</a> has comments disabled.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span></span>
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-63325184721257202292015-09-15T14:39:00.001-07:002016-10-10T08:48:44.580-07:00Money: The Road to Hell? <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Ask
anyone on the street about the problems that we face as a society
today, ask them philosophically what is wrong and you will get a
response like "corporate greed", "money is the root of
all evil", "government corruption", "loss of
common morals and ethics", perhaps even "racial hatred"
or "the environment".</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Money
very well may be the root of all evil. I would argue that fear itself
is the root of all evil. Money is a source of power, which can be
used for good or evil. Fear of the "money power" has lead
us down a path to evil.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">You
don't have to buy a certain brand of toothpaste, processed foods or a
brand new car, or even drive a car for that matter. If it is
corporate greed that is your answer, the real problem is likely that
you just haven't looked in the mirror. Although corporations are
occasional mistresses of government, a technological society requires
this. If we want better cars and better computers then companies need
co-operation from governments. These kinds of things require planning
and large capital investments and a knowledge of future conditions.
Voter pressure can prevent this when necessary or mitigate it. Better
rules for lobbyists could be written.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">In
the case of environmentalism, the stated case of carbon dioxide has
been self contradictory. It is nothing more than a set of examples of
various propaganda techniques. Fortunately, many people have had the
time and the inclination to look at both sides of the argument, and
believers in any man made carbon dioxide ruining the environment
theories have been virtually laughed out of existence. "Consensus",
a well known propaganda technique, still has a few, including
corporate media, still holding onto the nightmare or the dream,
depending on which side of the United Nations banking counter one is
standing. Most of the consensus is among establishment biologists and
doctorates of business administration by rumor while virtually
endless career atmospheric physicists are telling us it's a lie, in
person, in YouTube presentations and lectures that you never hear
about on corporate media. No one has a scorched earth policy and if
the debate was truly over you wouldn't hear actual qualified
scientists saying its a scam and doing damage to their own careers as
a result.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Carbon
is the one thing that remains constant in environmentalism. It causes
global cooling when there is cooling, it causes global warming when
there is warming. It causes temperature instabilities when cooling
becomes warming or warming becomes cooling. Their models do not
include the sun and clouds until recently.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Environmentalism
is motivated by the fact that the financial powers beleive that a far
better replacement for the war model of society would be to tax
carbon. The war model needs to be replaced. Tax carbon and you tax
and control life itself, more taxation will be required to support a
growing debt - which is the central problem. That is the motivation
of our controllers that is behind UN/Corporate environmentalism.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Political
corruption is a popular answer, as if politicians, by their very
nature are corrupt and that it is not the rules of the political
environment that make them behave as they do. People expect
politicians to jump into a pool of water without getting wet. They
name certain politicians as corrupt and causing particular problems,
always looking at individual trees instead of the forest, or rather,
the ground that the forest depends on. Every politician elected gets
labeled as corrupt by large segments of the population. People
continue to visit the polls. <i>All we have to do is elect the right
candidate.</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> All politicians must
write legislation to tax the public to service the growing debt.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
answer to our problems is not philosophical, it's empirical and all
the problems we face can be traced to a single source. There is the
monetary reformist illustration of a group of doctors looking over a
patient. One says "it's in the heart", another says "it's
in the liver", another one says "it's the digestive tract".
Multiple seemingly unrelated symptoms may be traced to a single
problem with the blood supply. In our organic society, money serves
the purpose of blood and carries energy to each of the organs.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">In
1913, United States was effectively taken over by private interests.
Private banks began to create interest bearing fiat currency to
finance government in the form of the Federal Reserve Act. Although
many people argue that the private Federal Reserve bank is
effectively governed, it is a private corporation for a reason. If it
was governed by the peoples "representatives" and in
people's interest, it wouldn't be privately owned. It is privately
owned, therefore works in the interest of it's owners. Part of the
deal the government has with the private central bank is that it may
borrow as much as it wishes. It does not need permission from the
public. Public control of interest rates, or reduction of interest
rates to near zero would not change the inherent character of the
system - the inherent characteristic of debt based system is that it
<i>must collapse</i> at some point.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Government
has a permanent partner and is always in bed with private bankers.
Corporations are only overnight guests that can be kicked out of bed
at any time with public pressure or lobbyist reform. Government must
always serve two masters, one being the banks that manage the economy
and the other being the voting public and it is here that the problem
in its most basic sense resides. No one can truly serve two masters.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Aristotle
explains that society always has an oligarchy and that oligarchy has
a different set of hopes, dreams and aspirations than ordinary people
under democratic and republic governments. (In the case of a
benevolent philosopher king, this conflict is eliminated). Plato
illustrates society from an oligarchical point of view with members
of the controlling oligarchy answering questions brought forward by
Socrates regarding the subject of justice.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
Republic Of Plato is a dream or a nightmare, depending on your
station in life. In our modern democracies and republics, a
controlling oligarchy controls the money supply and therefore
governments. He who has the gold rules. It will soon be a nightmare
for even the technocrats who will argue and support the system to
their last breath as the ballooning debt creates more bills to be
written into laws to create the income to service the always growing
debt. The very idea of privately funded governments with interest
bearing currency, along with the basic character of any oligarchy
with it's need of self preservation alone guarantees this. One need
not look for empirical evidence.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Mao
Tse Tung once said in the New York Times he would get TV's in homes
in Communist China. Communist China had the same degree of control of
their people, but required armed soldiers to be everywhere. Mass
propaganda is a cheaper and simpler control mechanism. We live in a
propaganda driven state that creates a set of fears that blinds
people to the common link of all fears, just as a deer is blinded
from seeing the side of the road when being approached by headlights
on a highway.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">It
is fear itself that creates an individual that is most receptive to
propaganda and everyone knows that propaganda can be used to create
fear. Corporate media, think-tank and unaccountable tax free NGO's
created and propaganda driven phoney terrorism and phoney
environmentalism create a myriad of fears. No one can escape
propaganda, and asking anyone to define would be like asking a fish
to define water. Propaganda is ubiquitous, from public education to
suggestive entertainment media to the "bubble headed bleached
blond"[1] on the set on the eleven o'clock news every night. The
fears create ostensible reasons to write more legislation.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Its
not what they say, it's what they do not say. People graduate public
school and post secondary education without even a slight
understanding of politics or economics. A few people know what a
Keynesian economic system is and how, in its current form is shaped
to serve a controlling oligarchy, those who own the banks and control
the money supply. Almost no one knows what "debt money" is,
it is like J.K. Galbraith said "<i>...it warps the mind...</i>".
Few people understand that the current monetary system must in fact
collapse at some point in time.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">People
talk about what scares them and the nature of the monetary system
isn't scary, at least until it is understood. It is ubiquitous, yet
not immediate. Cancer is a fear, most people fear the decline of the
economy. Fear is as ubiquitous in our lives as is propaganda. It
forms our objective consciousness and the subjective entertainment
media provides an escape.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Most
common politicians have almost no background in formal understanding
of political science, the true nature of the monetary system or even
know that "Law" is not synonymous with "Legal".
They are as much victims of both propaganda and the small box
thinking of common technocrats as everyone else. Only a few
politicians at the federal level even know what United Nations Agenda
21 is.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
necessity of a propaganda driven society is a direct consequence of
the monetary system. The type on monetary system in modern Western
democracies is the worse kind of monetary system imaginable. This
same system has been spread around the world through all the wars of
this century. The World Bank and IMF lend money to all countries now,
with the exception of Syria and North Korea. Countries that have been
said to stand against the USA have printed their own money. "War
is fought for money"[2]</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">If
everyone tuned into this specific problem the money establishment
would be in serious trouble. The phoney threat of environmental
disaster has many people that care about anything outside themselves
living in fear, locked in the headlights and unable to see the root
of their fear and the solution to eliminate it. They trust their
gods, the scientists, in corporate media. A scientist without
corporate media approval has no credibility. They will say they do
not automatically believe everything they hear, but they do, as long
as the message is delivered by an approved scientists. Its as if
scientists on TV have been given a truth serum and cannot lie because
"science doesn't lie". The Left has become non-intellectual
and non thinking because they live in fear.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
idea that natural contractions in the economy can be fixed with more
loans to governments is the basic premise of Keynesian
macro-economics. The economy expands while incurring a greater and
greater debt, requiring more and more expansion. Contractions can be
fixed with more loans. The contraction of the economy in 1929 lead to
the chapter 11 bankruptcy of the governments in 1933. There is no
longer enough money in the economy to pay the Federal debt.
Governments are now operated by private financial institutions.
Policy is written by the think tanks of the banking system.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Interest
bearing loans made to governments by private sources as well as
consumer loans made by private sources require a constantly expanding
economy. Every dollar in circulation bears interest for private
interest. The money in your pocket is earning interest for someone,
someone else is making these payments. A constantly expanding economy
is necessary in the form of more loans so that interest payments on
the money in circulation can be made. Both the government and the
people are insolvent, due to the fact that there is simply not enough
money in circulation to pay back all of the loans.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">There
is no reason for the ultra rich to believe their share of this debt
is equal to that of the middle classes, and every reason not think on
these terms. Assets that are created from debt money are not owned by
their "registered owners". They can be taken away anytime
with the stoke of a pen in the form of a new act or statute created
from a <i>bill</i> submitted to congress or parliament. We all know
perfectly well what a <i>bill</i> is. In this sense the Legalist
terminology is not obscure.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
Legal system provides an ostensible reason for assets to be taken
from their owners, but the very fact that they can shows that the
people do not own the assets they work and pay for with what money
they have after being robbed with the fraudulent "income tax".</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
money that any one who is not an owner of the private Federal Reserve
has in their hands is not theirs. If I lend someone something of
mine, and they sell it to someone else, that thing is still mine. The
money is not lawfully ours because we agree that this debt actually
exists. But there is no actual value associated with the money that
lies outside the fact that people work for it. But every dollar
worked for is owed, therefore not the property of its holder in a
lawful (rational) sense.
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">It
is a maxim of law that a debtor has no rights. Law has been built on
custom and that custom is referred to as the Law Merchant, the
customs, rationally developed to facilitate commerce, the true
purpose of laws. The world is a lawful place, this is necessary to
support commerce but the word "law" by definition means
almost "Absolute Truth", but not quite, it's built on
maxims that are rational and is therefore rational. Most people think
in a Legalist context and cannot see the irrationality and absurdity
from which the Legal system operates. They see delays in the courts,
attorneys, politicians and judges getting away with murder, but
cannot link this to something seemingly unrelated, such as phoney
terrorism, phoney environmentalism or the rise in cancer, just as a
heart problem may be understood to be unrelated to the liver.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Lawfully
the money has no value outside peoples willingness to work for it.
The privately owned banks do not add a substantive value to the
money, only the people do. Therefore the debt is not owed. Ignorance
of law creates the debt.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
Legal system was first conceived in ancient China and was created to
obfuscate rational law on behalf of a ruling class. The Legalist's
were shortly overthrown by the Confucianism. Propaganda and the
careful use of language by our programmers has made the term "Legal"
synonymous with the word law. Law and money are part of the same
system. If the money is debt based and designed to separate the
people from the products of their labour, the legal system must
support and justify this. The word "represent" as our
attorneys and politicians do for us, is not synonymous with "act
in our interest". Attorneys and politicians obfusgate the true
nature of the system and the fact that their job is to attorn our
assets over to the financial institutions. An attorney is not the
same thing as a lawyer and there are no lawyers. An attorney will
protect your legal rights, but cannot protect your lawful rights
because only debtors have attorneys. "The first thing we do is
kill all the lawyers".</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">On
the private side, you buying a car, fiat currency and fractional
reserve banking gives low interest rates and makes sense. Debt based
money can make sense, borrowing drives the economy. It permits
business minded people to rise above their current station in life. A
gold standard without fractional reserve banking would have interest
rates too high for commoners to borrow. Fractional reserve banking
creates the dream and the freedom that many people once had. It is a
logical and fair system that benefits everyone.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Fractional
reserve banking does not create the problem we face. The problem is
privately funded governments and their constant need to raise more
tax money to service an always expanding debt. Threats to public
safety provide an ostensible reason to increase taxation and service
the debt. Taxing carbon is ideal for this task.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
only chance of recovery is to change the monetary system from a debt
based system to an asset based system. This will create an
environment where people do own their own money and therefore the
assets which they purchase. True property rights could be restored.
Asset money based systems can take many forms. The next article in
this series, "Money: Experimenting With Heaven" will
explain the benefits of an asset based monetary system.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">In solving any problem the first step is to define it. It is bad thinking to believe that a problem cannot be solved before it is defined. It is also bad thinking to believe that if a problem is defined, and you do not have a solution, then no one has a solution. It is my belief that if this problem was well understood, a solution would appear, since the money system that will destroy our economy is based on a lie. </span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">[1]
Dirty Laundry (Don Henly)</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">[2]
The Republic Of Plato</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Bibliography</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
Technological Society by Jaques Ellul</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">http://dougplumb.blogspot.ca/2014/09/50-climate-scientists.html</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Aristotle
"The Politic"</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="title"></a><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="productTitle"></a>
John Kenneth Galbraith "Money: Whence It Came, Where It Went"
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">http://anticorruptionsociety.com/the-bankruptcy-of-america-1933/</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">The
Report From Iron Mountain (free PDF)</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Club
Of Rome: The Next Global Revolution (free PDF online)</span></div>
<div class="western" style="line-height: 160%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: large;">Silent
Weapons for Quiet Wars (free PDF online)
</span></div>
</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-46847950120915822232014-10-14T17:26:00.002-07:002014-10-14T17:26:56.069-07:00About Climate Skeptics <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
re Climate Skeptics <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/about.shtml" target="_blank">About</a> section on websites:
<br />
<br />
"The goal of Skeptical Science is to explain what peer reviewed science
has to say about global warming. When you peruse the many arguments of
global warming skeptics, a pattern emerges. Skeptic arguments tend to
focus on narrow pieces of the puzzle while neglecting the broader
picture. For example, focus on Climategate emails neglects the full
weight of scientific evidence for man-made global warming."
<br />
<br />
We focus on the lies and the little facts that can falsify arguments.
Its up to the folks that are putting forth the hypothesis to come up with unfalsifiable evidence and its
up to us to falsify those arguments. That's how science works.
If anywhere in your hypothesis it says "2+2=5" and we point it out then we win. Its that simple. Climate fascists have to correct their work, not accuse us of not "looking at the broader picture". There have been some huge lies and/or errors. One can watch the movie <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hh770Au1dk" target="_blank">Global Warming or Global Governance</a> or <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FvGoQ7h5hM" target="_blank">The Great Global Warming Swindle</a> to see what real climate scientists say about the practice of science inside the UN's IPCC.<br />
<br />
We do not have to look at big pictures, only find little lies and
sometimes big lies. Bad data collection is a form of lie. If the pro
ACCer's are intentionally misleading and twisting and changing their
arguments we only need to point that out.
<br />
<br />
This "about" section shows how little climate skeptics knows about
science, or how stupid they think their readers are. More than likely,
the latter.
<br />
<br />
<br />
Later in the same page it states:<br />
<br />
"Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook, the Climate Communication
Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland.
He studied physics at the University of Queensland, Australia. After
graduating, he majored in solar physics in his post-grad honours year."<br />
<br />
So obviously this guy isn't stupid when it comes to science. He just thinks his readers are. <br />
<br />
You can never underestimate the greenies lack of understanding when it comes to science. Many claim to be looking at the science when they have only a bachelors degree in something like biology. Climate Science is applied math, and understood at this level by a very few. Fortunately, for our side, we only have to point out the lies and where they say "2+2=5". I know it doesn't seem fair to the twisted leftist mind, but its just logic.<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-25584160502259101942014-09-30T08:13:00.000-07:002014-09-30T08:23:30.475-07:00James Traficant RIP September 27, 2014<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-size: large;">His own words...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.<br /><br />It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.<br /><br />The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States."<br /><br />Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be "money" in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or "currency." Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not "money." A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not "money." The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, gold and silver coin.<br /><br />It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any "money." Most Americans have not been paid any "money" for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are "bankrupt," along with the rest of the country?<br /><br />Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). when ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.<br /><br />Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.<br /><br />There is a fundamental difference between "paying" and "discharging" a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of "good & valuable consideration." Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.<br /><br />Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations.<br /><br />The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3]<br /><br />The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.<br /><br />Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.<br /><br />Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)<br /><br />"Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.<br /><br />In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.<br /><br />Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.<br /><br />This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed knowledge" of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it’s easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.<br /><br />Why don’t more people own their properties outright?<br /><br />Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?<br /><br />We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.<br /><br />America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country." [emphasis added]<br /><br />http://www.afn.org/~govern/bankruptcy.html</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">see also http://dougplumb.blogspot.ca/2013/02/hypothecation-you-own-nothing.html</span></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-71500666920252359512014-09-29T15:26:00.000-07:002014-09-29T15:31:14.667-07:00Post Modernism Dangers<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
(originally posted on writerbeat.com)<br />
<br />
Yesterday I decided to have a fire in the backyard. It was after 9 PM and dark outside so I needed a flashlight to find some wood lying around. I didn't have a flashlight, but I had a smart phone. I wondered if Kirk and Spock had flashlights on their communicators.<br />
<br />
I was watching Prof. Rick Roderick (R.I.P.) on Post Modernism earlier that day on my smart phone. I can download videos of him and sit outside and watch his talks on that tiny video display. In one talk he said that a man who thinks he is a poached egg gets convicted of lunacy solely because he is a minority. This talk took place in the mid nineties, when Nintendo was big and the internet wasn't.<br />
<br />
Its a crazy world we live in. 9-11 was an inside job. Global warming is a fraud. How do we figure this out? Not by looking at evidence, there is too much of that. The United States and its military industrial complex had the most to gain from 9-11, they also covered up evidence. If Global Warming was not a fraud, the IPCC wouldn't have had to lie so much. The banks and the UN have a lot to gain from the lies. They would have thousands of actual climate scientists warning us of the danger and would not have to create that illusion using filtering and other techniques of propaganda, mostly outlined in Aristotle's "Rhetoric". Scientists would line up to sign their petition – if they had one.<br />
<br />
Somehow we forgot that we shouldn't believe liars. Thankfully the biggest of lies can be destroyed by the simplest of logic. Some of us still know that.<br />
<br />
The multicultural society we live in has no grounding in ethical or moral truth anymore. God is dead just like Nietzsche said. The best we can hope for is not go crazy ourselves, like Nietzsche eventually did. He saw a man beat a horse and that was the final straw. We see much worse all the time in the hyper reality we live in. Its no wonder people cannot tell fact from fiction. It affects all of us in various ways. You cannot cure an illness until you recognize you have one. Recognizing this illness for many will be like a fish recognizing water – the ubiquitous nature of water prevents it for the fish. The ubiquitous nature of lies that surround us prevents many of us from recognizing them.<br />
<br />
We must ground ourselves in eternal truth, the greatest of greats, Kant, describes entering a dark room and having to hold onto something to orient himself so that he knows where he may walk without breaking anything or hurting himself.<br />
<br />
We are conscious. Consciousness forms the Holy Ghost, God is Law and the Son, forgiveness. Its the Holy Ghost that proves the existence of God. Being, as some people call it. It's this that the bankster's UN needs to destroy – the last vestige of reality, the notion that we are conscious and responsible for our own rights and wrongs. Destroy all religion; destroy all Being; Destroy reason itself. Destruction through deconstructionism. It is necessary to bring in the grand plan of Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / New World Order into view. People must be reduced to machines so they always do what they are told, irregardless of right and wrong.<br />
<br />
Much damage has been done by religion when it simplified itself for the masses, it anthropomorphized itself leading to its own discredit. But what else could it have done? It's a twisted version of Plato's Meno and the seeking of faith, which cannot be understood because it lies outside the bounds of reason.<br />
<br />
If we grab onto that one thing, consciousness, we may be able to find our way out. Start living according to the rights and wrongs we know in our souls. If we learn better what consciousness is we will know better why we must hang onto it tighter. We will see better why the Bankster's scientific Establishment needs to destroy the very notion of consciousness.<br />
<br />
This is how we stay human in the post modern world.</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-56924381934495727932014-09-25T15:15:00.000-07:002017-02-01T02:05:12.768-08:0050 Climate Scientists<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
I've been on the Linked In discussion groups talking about global warming, climate change or whatever is fashionable for it to be called these days. These fascists have really started making me angry and my keyboard has undergone some serious punishment as I have pounded on it to try and convince some of the unconvinceable that they are being bamboozled by these pro ACC folks.<br />
<br />
I surf through their links in their posts on the discussions and try to find actual 'climate scientists' - known better as 'atmospheric physicists'. I'm looking for some actual scientists - the atmospheric kind - the kind who's reputation will take a beating if they are wrong about this whole Greenhouse Gas thingy- the kind of words that have responsibility behind them.<br />
<br />
It turns out, in my previous look at qualifications of 'qualified folks' that most of the so called environmental scientists are actually sociologists and biologists. A sociologist or biologist won't take a beating if he or she is wrong about atmospheric physics "I got bamboozled just like everyone else", they can always say.<br />
<br />
I found an article in the Guardian...ha ha!! Real climate scientists at last ! Because I would rather believe the AGW hypothesis is true than what I do actually believe. I want to be convinced that the AGW hypothesis is true because I would be a lot happier if I did. What I think is far worse. What I think makes me ashamed to be a member of this species.<br />
<br />
Part of what makes me ashamed to be a member of the species is that I cannot get anyone from the pro AGW /ACC camp to go here <a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/" target="_blank">PetitionProject</a> I think its because they are afraid. Cult members are going to be afraid of things like <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4" target="_blank">this</a> and<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hh770Au1dk" target="_blank"> this</a> too. You can't get them to look at what real climate scientists are saying. They live in a world of smoke, mirrors and politics. Their cult leaders have warned them about going to sites like these.<br />
<br />
But I look, I looked at the Guardian and was thinking "Oh good....I was wrong..." But I wasn't. <br />
<br />
Maybe if I can show them once again how they are being bamboozled..instead of taking stupid Liberal insults and having those take the place of intelligent argument.<br />
<br />
So, lets see what constitutes Climate Scientist in the mind of a Cult Member. The Guardian has an article entitled: <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/sep/20/50-canadian-climate-researchers-in-support-of-climate-march" target="_blank">Climate Consensus: The 97 %</a>. So lets see...<br />
<br />
(1)Dr. Catherine Potvin, Professor, Department of Biology Ok Ok. So you don't always get it right the first time..so lets try it again.<br />
<br />
(2)Dr. Chantelle Richmond, Western University - dept of Geography. Twice the charm...<br />
<br />
(3)Dr. Fikret Berkes, University of Manitoba - Natural Resources. Never give up<br />
<br />
(4)Dr. Mark Stoddart, Memorial University - Dept of Sociology. I think we may find one actual physicist, but I'm not betting on it. Keep trying. Never give up...<br />
<br />
(5) Dr. Sally Aitken, University of British Columbia - Forest Genetics<br />
<br />
(6) Dr. Aerin Jacob, University of Victoria: - Applied Conservation Science<br />
<br />
(7) Dr. Alison Kemper, Ryerson University - Marketing<br />
<br />
(8) Dr. André Potvin, Université Laval- Architecture<br />
<br />
(9) Dr. Andreas Heyland, University of Guelph - Comparative physiology<br />
<br />
(10) <span class="st">Dr. Ann Dale, Royal Roads - University Canada Research Chair in
Sustainable Community Development</span><br />
<br />
<span class="st">(11) </span>Dr. Ashlee Cunsolo Willox, Cape Breton University - Nursing & Indigenous Studies<br />
<br />
(12) Dr. Brent Sinclair - biologist <br />
<br />
(13) Dr. Bruno Dyck, University of Manitoba - Business administration<br />
<br />
There is a bit of trend here, I don't think we are going to see a world class climate scientist in this group. The qualifications seem to be diverging into fields where one may not even be required to know what climate even is.<br />
<br />
So if the sky is falling and the earth will die unless we let the banks and their UN start telling us what we can and cannot have for energy while they fly around in private jets, I want to hear it from an actual Climate Scientist !!!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-23193444395183904442014-09-19T15:36:00.001-07:002014-09-22T10:23:40.520-07:00Naomi Shocking Us Into Green Communism Based on AGW fraud<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Naomi Klein, author of the famous book, The Shock Doctrine, showed us the value of shock in leading us into the fraudulent war on terror. She has written another book, using the methods given in The Shock Doctrine to shock us into United Nations Agenda 21 based on the phoney AGW threat.<br />
<br />
The Rhodes Scholar seems to have followed lessons that she learned from the US Neocons to shock us into helping the global financiers in establishing their Neoliberal Green communist agenda (Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development) New World Order.<br />
<br />
She has an interview of the Ford Foundation funded Democracy Now! <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2014/9/18/capitalism_vs_the_climate_naomi_klein">Here</a><br />
<br />
So you don't have to buy her stupid book.<br />
<br />
She says we must transform the economy to reduce "emissions" - of carbon, I assume. I think the only emissions we need to worry about are those emanating from people like Naomi Klein.<br />
<br />
Its important to know that burning hydrocarbons has the by products of water and carbon dioxide. (That "smoke" you see coming out of "smoke stacks" of Western clean burning coal burning plants in AGW propaganda is actually water). Both of these are life giving gases.<br />
<br />
In the Chinese coal plants? Who knows. They don't have regulations over there and the Neoliberal Rhodes Scholar isn't pushing for trade sanctions against China and their slave factories to reduce real harmful rather than imaginary harmful emissions that are the result of by-products emitted by dirty plants without 'scrubbers'.<br />
<br />
Naomi's
argument is a scientific one - we must stop putting "carbon", meaning
CO2, into the environment to stop global warming. Really CO2 isn't bad
for the environment according to <a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/">qualified folks</a>.<br />
<br />
The
science behind the pro AGW movement has always been political science
and the science behind the anti AGW movement has always been the hard
kind.You don't see qualified folks like<a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/" target="_blank"> this</a>
on Naomi's side of things, you see people like....well....Naomi. They
always say they have qualified people behind them, you just never hear
from these qualified people. They have corporate media to repeat their
mantra until it gets believed.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjZKQ_gtIrwH-kMLknGk8vHy8J9r5bP3C7WO-otz-AUaNOkpsZg_xf7XPTu3nrWMG9D5kPa45SY9s7MGfLSIBUo_6uUaksO6ESpnBpB_3CFggkIk_g8eWn6sWFVEFa-GOiK-j9Wg9dmOgY/s1600/Scientists.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjZKQ_gtIrwH-kMLknGk8vHy8J9r5bP3C7WO-otz-AUaNOkpsZg_xf7XPTu3nrWMG9D5kPa45SY9s7MGfLSIBUo_6uUaksO6ESpnBpB_3CFggkIk_g8eWn6sWFVEFa-GOiK-j9Wg9dmOgY/s1600/Scientists.jpg" height="320" width="294" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
The rest of the interview is such BS that I can't even pollute my keyboard by repeating it here. She says "We must invest more in the public sphere...." - just to warn you. You won't believe it if I just write it all here anyhow. See for yourself at the Ford Foundation media outlet linked above. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-11477790780960643142014-09-16T11:27:00.002-07:002014-09-16T11:27:54.570-07:00Who Is Really In Control ?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
After about 6 years of listening to and reading political commentary on the internet and reading political philosophy and studying law I can say that if I could list only one person that every person should listen to, that person would be Catharine Austin Fitts. She does explain the problem, its symptoms and what we need to do to fix the situation that we currently face: Tyrannical communism & complete destruction of existing economy. She does this by exposing people to common-sense reason and some aspects of the nature of our relationship with the government.<br />
<br />
In her latest interview on Alex Jones, www.infowars.com, she poses a question, Who is really in control ?<br />
Fitts has an interview with Alex Jones (PrisonPlanet TV) on this page <a href="http://solari.com//events/">http://solari.com//events/</a> , she explains the problem at the core.<br />
<br />
Are The Corporations In Control ?<br />
<br />
Many people assume that because the corporations lobby governments and have enormous concentrations of wealth to do this affectively. They must be the ones that shape government. But this is not true because they play according to the rules. The main rule is that they are lawfully required to operate in the financial interest of their shareholders. To not do this is to break the rules and to expose themselves to liability. They have no choice but to operate the way they do.<br />
<br />
Are The Paid Off Politicians In Control ?<br />
<br />
The only responsibility a politician has to its electorate is to get re-elected. Lobbyists and corporations aid them in this task so the lobbyists and corporations are helping the politicans fullfill their single obligation to the public - that is get re-elected.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-78681638072949856192014-09-16T11:25:00.002-07:002014-09-21T08:04:10.534-07:00Enviro-Fascists are Back & What to do About It<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
You can't really argue with these people. They just want to believe, so they do. One would have to believe that the thousands of scientists on PetitionProject.org are either all being duped by the oil companies or actually have a scotched earth policy in order to believe that the threat of AGW is real.<br />
<br />
What if they turned their attention to monetary reform ?<br />
<br />
Everyone would have a lot more money and live much better and tend to have fewer children. This would solve the dreaded (yet ridiculous) notion of overpopulation. The earth would be safe from over population.<br />
<br />
Honest money would mean fewer, if any wars. Our wars are fought for money, just like wars were fought for money in the Republic Of Plato, and ever since. Our banks want to print everyone's money and those countries that cannot be coerced or corrupted into doing so get bombed. Its just they way the world works. If we had honest money we would have fewer wars and stop having to build the stuff all over again that got blown up and stop having to build and operate things like tanks, bombers and battleships.<br />
<br />
Honest money creates a smaller political class and therefore bad ideas that seem to serve the environmental interest but really just serve to expand and fatten an existing political class would be practically non existent. Stupid ideas like solar and wind farms would not come to fruition because they wouldn't be subsidized. (An idea needs government subsidization because it is a bad idea.) A smaller political class would result in smaller taxes and less corruption.<br />
<br />
That could get the snake eating its own tail.</div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-20172954006070784642014-09-13T22:42:00.002-07:002014-09-21T08:06:00.559-07:00Michelle's a Fag<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
One morning, while listening to E. Michael Jones on cultural Marxism I took off my headphones to listen to some of my co-workers talk about the recently born notion of Michelle Obama being a transvestite. My contribution to this discussion was that it really shouldn't surprise anyone if its true.<br />
<br />
The video below outlines the physical evidence for this and the various characteristics of her / his physical appearance. Some of the evidence is broad shoulders, index finger longer than the ring finger, traces of a removed Adam's apple and a few other things.<br />
<br />
We know that Obama is a homosexual, if fact all US presidents with the exception of Nixon and Clinton were homosexuals - or that is what some believe. I think it's probably true.<br />
<br />
Homosexuals are wonderful tools in politics because they can be more easily controlled. If George Bush got out of control or was overcome by a sudden act of decency and upset the order of things (the rest of us getting constantly screwed by bankers and attorneys), his handlers only needed to call the NY Times or the Washington Post or the Communist News Network and expose the fact that he had male prostitutes visit the White House quite regularly. Barry Sataro has his golf and stays out of the way of the machine, GW had his male prostitutes.<br />
<br />
Its all too crazy. You gotta laugh once in a while, and here is a video for some good honest laughter. Its a case well stated.<br />
<br />
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gvuulZPbfBg<br />
<br />
Joan, "Oh shut up, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about", Rivers also commented about this shortly before her death.<br />
<br />
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoxlqhukLxw<br />
<br />
Joan always told it like it was. These comedians are sometimes our greatest philosophers.<br />
<br />
It really shouldn't surprise anyone that the "first lady", normally believed to be a heterosexual female is in fact a homosexual male.<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-88605106369146846552014-09-13T15:09:00.003-07:002014-09-13T15:09:51.812-07:00My Book: Power Outage<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
I recently published an 80,000 word book on Smashwords as an e-book. It will be available through most regular channels in short time but may or may not be found on Amazon. I haven't looked into Amazon yet and have heard some things that cause me not to jump at the idea. "Another Microsoft" is a phrase that runs through my mind when considering this.<br />
<br />
The book is a fictional story about a group of people who build a shelter to protect them from an economic crash, a war, or anything else that comes along. They have the money and they buy the peace of mind.<br />
<br />
The electricity goes out due to a phenomenon known as an EMP, an Electro Magnetic Pulse that destroys electrical circuits. This is a real phenomonen or maybe just a possibility. It may have happened two hundred years ago without anyone noticing. It may happen all the time, every hundred or two hundred years. No one knows.<br />
<br />
The book is about political power, after the existing system is destroyed so are its power structures.<br />
<br />
The book forms an examination of different political systems such as collectivism, democracy, anarchism as well as others.<br />
<br />
It is an action adventure that is the story of a group of people who make a cross country journey in a post <span class="st">apocalyptic</span> world. It is the story of the people they meet on their journey to meet the philosopher king.<br />
<br />
Readers are permitted to read the first 75 % of this book free of charge. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/469099">https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/469099</a></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-43853765042608156642013-10-17T06:45:00.000-07:002013-10-17T06:45:02.144-07:00Karen Hudes Speaks<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Karen Hudes, a senior attorney from the world bank has become a whistle-blower. I've been thinking that these attorneys are nothing more than dupes for the powers that be for a long time. Hudes and a few others are the exceptions to the rule.<br />
<br />
Here are some of the things she says:<br />
<br />
<b>(1) Your tax money goes to the City Of London then the Vatican. The Jesuits are robbing the people of all their wealth.</b><br />
<br />
I've heard this before and it makes sense but this ideas never formed part of my world view because I have no means of checking or verifying them. I've never heard something like this coming from the mouth of such a highly esteemed ex member of the establishment. Paul Craig Roberts (the colonel or the economist) don't say this but both are highly critical of the establishment.<br />
<br />
Agenda 2, better known as sustainable development is the means of the robbery. <br />
<br />
She knows this because she followed the money, not from reading conspiracy theory web sites.<br />
<br />
<b>(2) They have tried to bribe her but she will not be a dupe.</b><br />
<br />
There is no honor among thieves. <br />
<br />
<b>(3) She believes the world will return to the rule of law before everything falls apart. </b><br />
<br />
<b> </b>She says she has many people on her side. She says that we need to watch and learn the facts - us little people have to be involved, both watching and learning. <br />
<br />
<br />
Of course we have to be involved. If we wish to preserve a free society we must be involved and this has been true for all time. Aristotle explains that any civilization has an oligarchy on the top. The political body serves both the people and the oligarchy. This is the basis of the philosophy of Legalism, first applied in ancient China and before the Confusionists threw them out. People need to be involved to preserve their rights.<br />
<br />
<br />
The reason why the powers that be are robbing us and destroying our
conception of society is reasoned out and explained in Plato's Republic.
The members of the oligarchy have a different conception of justice than commoners and to
create the just society ordinary people must have their knowledge
limited and be focused on their task in society and be prevented from thinking outside their box. Everyone over the age
of ten years old must be killed off so that the new just society can be
built upon the beliefs of the people. These beliefs are carefully shaped
by education. <br />
<br />
<br />
<b>(4) Secret Societies will be eliminated. </b><br />
<br />
This is a well known part of the plan. Exactly how does this get accomplished - certainly not by tearing down Masonic and Rosa Crucian meeting halls and buildings. It can only be accomplished by tearing down the members of the secret societies themselves. Masons and the like would do well to research things like the Georgia Guidestones. I don't recall where I read that secret societies will be eliminated but it seems necessary for a rule of law to apply.<br />
<br />
There is a huge awakening happening, a woman that was a stenographer at the White House stood up and said that the congress is just a bunch of devil worshipping free masons. Not far from the truth - most belong to the highly secretive and exclusive BAR association.<br />
<br />
She has many interviews on You-Tube and they can be found with a simple search of her name. <br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6609753361734121782.post-26541202241213410852013-05-31T19:22:00.001-07:002014-09-13T22:45:45.723-07:00The Legal System and The Law <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
See http://www.youtube.com/embed/svGDZOW-brA?rel=0. This isn't the law, its the legal system. It is the fundamental definition of administrative tyranny. The laws are something everyone knows. Kant calls it a-priori knowledge. We know the laws, they are in our hearts like we know the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. This is our reality.<br />
<br />
Laws form the basis for all religions and religion is about our law-maker, whatever we conjecture this as. It certainly isn't a gang of hoodlums sitting on capital hill. These people are just punks, and if they are anything like our parliamentarians, you wouldn't want them as neighbors. Good people are just too comfortable or too gutless to speak out about it.<br />
<br />
The legal system is for the unwise. They do not know that the legal system presupposes that any of its victims are debtors. A maxim in law is that a debtor has no rights. Think about this.<br />
<br />
Our so-called debt isn't real either. Its monopoly money and nothing more and in every sense of the word monopoly. It is backed by neither substance nor promise from its creators. We work for it, we promise to work for it and that is its only value.<br />
<br />
Its our money and we don't owe a thing. And us citizens of this North American Union should not be subject to such an abuse as this legal system really is because we owe these bankers and attorneys nothing.<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
Doug Plumbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13398407489022244485noreply@blogger.com0