Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Read This Now

Col. Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921]…

“[Very] soon every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology we can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us, will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

Friday, October 15, 2010

The Critique Of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant (review)

 I didn't like math much when I went through high school, but when I learned calculus, I was fascinated. Calculus is a guided, safe and relatively easy journey to the very limits of human reason and understanding. It is almost magical but also completely intuitive after given the requisite amount of consideration. I have always thought of myself as a word smith rather than a real intellectual, but I have to credit the increase in my overall consciousness to Kant for those aforementioned words. James Stewart, the author of my first calculus textbook says that calculus is "the most powerful weapon of thought ever developed by mankind". IMO, "The Critique Of Pure Reason" is as awe inspiring, perhaps almost as "transcendental" as the fundamental theorem of calculus.

I have read a number of books on philosophy, about ten of them are on the Wiki list of the most important books ever written. Some of these books, such as J.S. Mills "On Liberty" are very easy to read and lead the new reader of philosophy to a greater understanding. Others such as Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics" are books that once you read them you are left with the feeling that everyone should read them and that they should be taught in high schools.

Leo Strauss' "History and Natural Right" is not on the aforementioned list but is both eloquent and enjoyable, even if you dis-agree with Strauss' thesis, you have to appreciate the flow of the words and the thorough and complete reasoning contained in this book. Having not yet read Hobbs, and being unclear  about the second chapter I still enjoyed this book very much.

I found Aristotle's "The Politic" drier than a glass of sand in the middle of a desert. I had to get into a little self mutilation in the form of biting my lip until it bled or occasionally pinching myself to stay awake and continue reading that mammoth, but it was worth the effort in the end. Its amazing what he knew that applies to what we see today in politics. He offers us conspiracy theorists an arsenal of information regarding the nature of rule by man.

Nietzsche, to me, was very difficult- incomprehensible at times and with no clear thesis. To me it sounded like Nietzsche hung around coffee shops and jotted down what he overheard from others- nothing to see here IMO. Plato's Republic was also much more difficult than Kant's book. I would say The Republic is the most difficult book I have ever read but very well worth the effort. (one can be fooled into thinking Platos' Republic is easy by not really reading into it). I find Kant to be very clear and full of explanation.

Besides calculus, perhaps even slightly more so, in terms of pure value for the mind is Kant's book. During the time I spent reading this book I had thought about blogging on various little bits of it, but then decided that I couldn't quote it directly without leaving a confused reader. I am not smart enough to accurately summarize what this book has to say- it needs all of its pages. Its not about Kantian ethics, but concludes with a reasoned justification for the Kantian view of the world.

I found the book as easy to read and as enjoyable to read as any of the others listed above, with the possible exception of Strauss. Strauss is a great thinker and a great writer, Kant says more but is not so enjoyable to read as Strauss. Kant's book is much deeper than these other ones.

This is a book that questions the very notion of reason as a thought process when applied to cosmological questions. Although it acknowledges that reason is the highest form of thought, in particular "pure reason" which requires no empirical information, it informs us of reason's weakness and how it is so often claimed to be applied by philosophers in what can really only be described as sophism. Kant exposes what I have termed as the "Gods Of Reason".

This book is listed as one of the ten most difficult books to read of all time, right up there with Joyce's "Finnigans Wake",  Hegels "Phenomenology Of Spirit",  Sartre's "Being and Nothingness" and Hiedeggers "Being & Time". These books are books I have always considered to be over my head. Joyces book never interested me but one day I hope to read the others.


This is a heavy read, the full 650 pages are required, but it is written in little sections of 20 or so pages. I found my brain to be overheating a bit if I tried to read more than one section at a sitting. This was due to the ideas of Kant, not so much due to my difficulty in understanding his words. I also found a dictionary of philosophy to be a necessary co-companion to the book because Kant introduces a lot of new terms.

A book like Critique Of Pure Reason requires careful study, a single read through is just a small taste of the big picture of Kant's view. The material is incredibly important and overall addresses the very concept of freewill. Without freewill, any kind of morality is irrelevant. This issue takes the reader on a journey to consider the nature of consciousness and sensory perception, using only reason without experience. This is the very core and root and purpose of philosophy and nothing I have ever read comes close to this in penetrating the real issues that form the foundations of ethics.

I read the Smith Kemp version of The Critique Of Pure Reason, I listened to the newer versions from MP3's on the web which are said to be as good as the Smith Kemp translation in terms of accuracy but my problem with those is that they use more complex words than what the 1923 Smith Kemp version  does.
 It will be a long time before I fully appreciate, and may never completely understand, what is contained in this first of three critiques written by Immanuel Kant.


Finally, the book has no prerequisites, with the possible exception of Hume and Liebniz (note that in calculus the symbology used to give the common man intuitive understanding of this branch of math is termed "Liebniz notation"). Kants thoughts on Hume and Humes beliefs seem to be well explained.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Burning The Koran: Subtle Propaganda

The latest uproar regarding burning the Koran on 9/11 is nothing more than a subtle propaganda technique used to make people forget that 9/11 was an inside job. There can be no doubt about this, given that the total destruction of building 7 (Solomon Brothers Building) was announced on the controlled news networks approximately 20 minutes before it supposedly "succumbed to fires". This prior knowledge proves that 9/11 was an inside job over and above all of the common sense that can be applied to how the buildings collapsed. Common sense tells us that a straight line is the shortest distance between tow points and that a building does not collapse straight down in an organized fashion through its path of greatest resistance.

Those people that require expert confirmation just lack common sense. This is the opinion of many of the experts I have spoken to in person after asking them about this.

More importantly, as we argue about the Koran burning, we temporarily forget that 9/11 was an inside job and that burning the Koran has nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. An injection of truth reminding us of the cause of the building collapses will be inoculation against this technique.

The best book on techniques of propaganda that I have ever heard of is the one by Jacques Ellul called "Propaganda: The Shaping of Men's Attitudes". This technique and its counter technique of truth is well explained in this book. It is a far more exhaustive treatment of the subject than the one by Bernays, which is really only introductory and very basic.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Building What ?

Building What ?

Its unlikely that any investigation of 9/11 will ever take place. The un-accountable BAR association will never allow it into its courts. BAR members will not push for it.

This is the perfect example of what is wrong with our society. Power is unaccountable because the BAR association wants it that way and they have their monopoly on justice.

Its the 800 lb gorilla in all the countries that no one is noticing. Bring justice back, send the BAR members back to England.

If you still don't believe 9/11 was an inside job, search "wtc7 prior knowledge" for proof. Ask yourself why no one will get an independent inquiry before the BAR association courts.




Saturday, August 21, 2010

The Anti-Lawyer Party (ALP)

(re-printed with permission from the ALP)

TREASON

THE INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY OF THE LAWYERS TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN


Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed IN the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people in unconstitutional courts, we, the people, must protect ourselves where we need the most protection, in the courtrooms, FROM the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

The courts are always ruling AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in an INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN (TREASON). They already have taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar
associations, making a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY.

This necessitated an URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI-LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP).

All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Art. IV, Sec. 4, of the U.S. Constitution, "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government," any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public office or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made ONLY themselves 1 st class citizens, where all public offices and all three branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only 2 branches of government and to only certain offices in those 2 branches of government, BECAUSE ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE NON-LAWYERS HAVE BEEN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY DEGRADED, BY THE LAWYERS, TO THE STATUS OF 2ND CLASS CITIZENS.

When the courts belong to the people, as the U. S. Constitution REQUIRES (Art. IV, Sec. 4), we, the people, will NEVER EVER rule against ourselves.

In these unconstitutional courts (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, wearing unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY (Art. 1, Secs. 9 and 16), with a lot of hanky-panky and hocus-pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology where the people are terrorized by terrorists (lawyers and lawyer-judges) in the courts.

The judicial branch of government does NOT have the constitutional power to issue court orders or any other kind of orders.

ONLY presidents and governors have the constitutional power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution. "

Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill outfancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law: that he does not know court rules and procedures: etc. This is unconstitutional (1 st Amend.), as it denies the citizen access to the courts, which are supposed to belong to the people. Instead, all "our" courts are owned by lawyers (traitors) internationally.

In court, lawyers cue the lawyer-judges with certain words and phrases, directing and signaling the type of fix to take place. The most extreme inhuman punishment is inflicted on a victim when a lawyer " signals" the lawyer-judge that the victim has extreme disrespect for the legal profession and the judiciary, or that the victim will not "cooperate.' ' All cases are fixed with these and other cues and signals, which have nothing to do with the law or the U. S. Constitution.

Under this unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers), NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court., anything else is a Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U. S. Constitution (Art. 1, Secs. 9 & 10).

The U. S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer, or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel can be anyone the accused chooses WITHOUT limitation. NEITHER THE %,,)RD LAWYER NOR THE ATTORNEY APPEAR ANYWHERE IN THE U. S. CONSTITUTION.

Lawyers and lawyer-judges created unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial *'Motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigation, which is BARRATRY and is also in violation of the U.S. Constitution, as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. The multitude of pre-trials are actually pre-trials for the pre-trials and pre-trials for the pre-pre-trials, benefiting the lawyers only. These pre-trials and post-trials too, started with the TAKE-OVER of the courts by the INTERNATIONALLY affiliated bar associations, in a CONSPIRACY; before this, defendants only had a trial, NOT TRIALS.

When a criminal is freed on a "TECHNICALITY, " he is freed because of a FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY, NOT BY ANY---TECHNICALITY.

Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL lawyer-judges have to disqualify themselves, as there cannot be a constitutional trial and there also would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because ''Officers of the Court" are on both sides of the BENCH.

These same LAWYER-judges are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ANNUALLY, all in violation of the conflict of interest laws.

Since crime and treason is against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these traitors. the lawyers.

As long as there are lawyers. there will never ever be any law, constitution, or justice, There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS).

CASE "LAW" is unconstitutional, as CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. ONLY THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT HAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO ENACT LAWS.

When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony, when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "no". The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes. and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcripts FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch Of government, as they have the unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Art. 1, Secs. 9 and 10). "Officer of the Court," Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch. but non-lawyer citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers, as 1 st class citizens. can be hired or elected to any of the 3 branches of government. All lawyers, being "Officers of the Court" in the Judicial Branch, are unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to either the executive or the legislative branches: this is in violation of the separation of powers checks and balances. and the conflict of interest laws.

ALL lawyers are UNDER ORDERS to HELP ONLY CROOKS and' to AC. VICTIMIZE VICTIMS. That is why ONLY CROOKS SHOULD LIKE LAWYERS. who are their counterparts.

The 6th Amendment states, ''the accused shall enjoy the right to a SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL." Yet, lawyer- judges have lawyers (HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES) approach the bench and talk in whispers, meet in the judge's chambers, talk in SECRET, send the jury OUT of the courtroom, etc. Also lawyer-judges order the litigants, witnesses, lawyers, news media, etal.from discussing the trial, making the trial an unconstitutional SECRET TRIAL, NOT A PUBLIC TRIAL.

No one can be sentenced to prison unless convicted of a crime BY A JURY (THE PEOPLE). ONLY the people (THE JURY) have the POWER to decide the guilt or innocence of the accused as Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 3, of the U.S. Constitution states, "THE TRIAL OF ALL CRIMES, except in cases of impeachment, SHALL BE BY JURY." Since this is a CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT, a trial by jury cannot be "waived," as ONLY A JURY, under the U.S. Constitution, HAS THE POWER TO DECIDE THE GUILT OR INNOCENCE OF THE ACCUSED.,

The 6th Amendment REAFFIRMS the CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT OF A TRIAL BY JURY ONLY, "In ALL criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial JURY of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."

In a REPUBLIC, NOTHING is above the 'PEOPLE and the PEOPLE make the decisions. NOT A RULING CLASS. That is why a jury's verdict cannot be reversed by any government official, such as a lawyer-judge or anyone else. If a lawyer-judge or lawyer-judges can reverse a jury's verdict, then, that would place them above the people, making "our" government an ARISTOCRACY and NOT a REPUBLIC. A jury (the PEOPLE) can even veto stupid and unjust legislation, by finding victims of stupid and unjust laws, passed by the lawyers in the legislatures, innocent, even though they pleaded guilty. THE PEOPLE IN A REPUBLIC ARE SOVEREIGN.

In CONTEMPT OF COURT, there is.

NO Due Process of. Law
NO Arrest
NO Rights Read
NO Bail
NO Habeas Corpus
NO Prosecutor
NO Jury AND
NO Trial - LYNCHING

Yet, persons held in CONTEMPT OF COURT, are LYNCHED by a DESPOT. a lawyer-judge, who does:

the Accusing the Prosecuting the Convicting and the Sentencing, ALL WITHOUT A TRIAL - LYNCHING

ALL THIS IS A BILL OF ATTAINDER (Art. 1. Secs. 9 and 10)

Lawyer-judges have been releasing from prison, criminals who have raped and murdered little children because their "rights- were not read to them. But, contempt of court LYNCH VICTIMS, never having had their "rights" read to them, must remain in prison.

The lawyer-judges ORDER law enforcement officers, who also are sworn to support the U. S. Constitution, to imprison contempt of court LYNCH VICTI MS and to be part of a LYNCH MOB. Law enforcement officers should REFUSE to obey these DESPOTIC ILLEGAL ORDERS to imprison contempt of court LYNCH VICTIMS and refuse to be a part of a LYNCH MOB. No one has to obey an illegal order.

Under the UNCONSTITUTIONAL DESPOTIC "LAWYER SYSTEM" we now have, a COURT ORDER could be issued declaring that anyone who violates a law. of any kind. would be in violation of a COURT ORDER and BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT (LYNCHED).

When a victim, in a courtroom, tries to bring out the truth or to exercise a constitutional right. the lawyer-judge will call it an ''OUTBURST" and LYNCH THE VICTIM with contempt of court, then practice medicine without a license by ordering the victim to undergo psychiatric examinations.

The U. S. Constitution being the supreme fundamental law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (unconstitutional amendments). That is why all judges and public officials are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT to interpret it. Imagine, hypothetically, how stupid it would be if any
constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution. "

An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX MONEY is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY THE LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

Organized crime never ever existed, until the bar associations took over the courts and the government. Now crime is organized internationally, just as the bar associations are organized, where some of their international affiliations include: International Judicial Association, International Trial Lawyers Association, World Peace Through Law Center, World Assembly of Judges, etal[. This means that the bar associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY. Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS, ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same unconstitutional "lawyer' system" of hanky-panky and hocus-pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED' STATES FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE. ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF TREASON.

District Attorneys and State's Attorneys have TAKEN OVER the grand juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crime's committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THESE DOCUMENTED ACTS OF TREASON AND OTHER CRIMES, COMMITTED BY THE LAWYERS AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, TO THE GRAND JURIES! An INDICTMENT would call for the ARREST OF ALL LAWYERS, AND LAWYER-JUDGES, INCLUDING THE LAWYER- JUDGES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON AND OTHER CRIMES.

In elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS. Never ever vote for a lawyer. Vote FOR non-lawyers ONLY. If only lawyers are running for election to the same off ice, do NOT vote for any of them, as they are ALL ALIKE. ALL lawyers are programmed to be TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES.

The lawyers, THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULING CLASS, have taken over our government and our live COMPLETELY, so that now the lawyers are our MASTERS and we" the people, are their SLAVES. This is why the ANTI-LAWYER PARTY FIGHTS LAWYERS ONLY, ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING ELSE, AS THIS ONE FIGHT WINS ALL THE FIGHTS. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY OF SAVING THE PEOPLE, THE U. S. CONSTITUTION AND THE UNITED STATES -- THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO WIN!!

START A LOCAL CHAPTER IN YOUR AREA OF THE ANTI-LAWYER PARTY (ALP) (the 2nd Party)



ANTI-LAWYER PARTY


Anti-Lawyer Party
Delaware Chapter
1624 Savannah Rd.
Lewes, DE 19958

ANTI-LAWYER PARTY
Kenosha Co., WI Chap.
6308 - 24th Ave.
Kenosha, WI 53140


PERMISSION GIVEN TO REPRODUCE AND DISTRIBUTE IN WHOLE OR IN PART

Thursday, August 19, 2010

The Gold Standard

The gold standard will not save us. The system espoused by Ron Paul and the rest of the gold bugs will be identical to the system we now have. We still have a natural right because our money is made out of paper. When the money becomes real, we will have no viable natural right defense in the courts- as we do now - or at least the few of us that read do.

Our natural right, the philosophy which the America was created by has dis-appeared, but it still exists in practice because the money is fake. When the money becomes real, our natural right will dis-appear. The philosophy of the forefathers of America will be gone - "ancient history". When America loses her freedoms the restof the countries will follow. Only America carries the torch of natural right.

The Law Merchant is the most important concept that describes our society the way it truly operates and attourneys and money are really the same system. If we switch to a gold standard and keep our attourneys we will be lead into an iron yoke of slavery. The banksters will still lend the country money, they will control any kind of gold mining. All of the gold will be lent into existance.

The attourneys will be empowered to attourn yours and my own wealth over to the banksters just as they do now, but we will be forced to enter the BAR in court cases and be re-presented by attourneys (as slaves to the crown bankers).

What people do not understand and desperately need to understand is that attourneys rule this planet. The same BAR association members are the attourneys, judges and politicians in every "westernized" country. They make the rules, they interpret them. This is precisely why no one will ever get investigated for 9/11, all the wars will continue - because the banksters of the Crown and their attourneys want it that way.

See the posts below regarding attourneys and what they actually do. Learn the difference between an attourney and a lawyer. Above all else, we MUST stop electing attourneys.

Friday, August 13, 2010

One For The Anarchists

We always assume that traffic lights are necessary. The implications of this video are profound and won't be lost on anyone. I'm not an anarchist, but I am further from a socialist.

see YouTube or the embedded video below.

Followers

About Me

My photo
Author of "Power Outage", available on Smashwords. I am a 50 year old free market libertarian who has had the time to read and consider the nature of globalism and the big machine that is surrounding us. I have participated in politics by running at the Fed level and debated Agenda 21 and 9-11 truth in front of large audiences. My background is in engineering and software creation. My business has provided me with significant time and freedom to learn the truth about the world around us. My goal is to expose Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development and Cultural Marxism.