Posts
re Climate Skeptics About section on websites:
"The goal of Skeptical Science is to explain what peer reviewed science has to say about global warming. When you peruse the many arguments of global warming skeptics, a pattern emerges. Skeptic arguments tend to focus on narrow pieces of the puzzle while neglecting the broader picture. For example, focus on Climategate emails neglects the full weight of scientific evidence for man-made global warming."
We focus on the lies and the little facts that can falsify arguments. Its up to the folks that are putting forth the hypothesis to come up with unfalsifiable evidence and its up to us to falsify those arguments. That's how science works. If anywhere in your hypothesis it says "2+2=5" and we point it out then we win. Its that simple. Climate fascists have to correct their work, not accuse us of not "looking at the broader picture". There have been some huge lies and/or errors. One can watch the movie Global Warming or Global Governance or The Great Global Warming Swindle to see what real climate scientists say about the practice of science inside the UN's IPCC.
We do not have to look at big pictures, only find little lies and sometimes big lies. Bad data collection is a form of lie. If the pro ACCer's are intentionally misleading and twisting and changing their arguments we only need to point that out.
This "about" section shows how little climate skeptics knows about science, or how stupid they think their readers are. More than likely, the latter.
Later in the same page it states:
"Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook, the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He studied physics at the University of Queensland, Australia. After graduating, he majored in solar physics in his post-grad honours year."
So obviously this guy isn't stupid when it comes to science. He just thinks his readers are.
You can never underestimate the greenies lack of understanding when it comes to science. Many claim to be looking at the science when they have only a bachelors degree in something like biology. Climate Science is applied math, and understood at this level by a very few. Fortunately, for our side, we only have to point out the lies and where they say "2+2=5". I know it doesn't seem fair to the twisted leftist mind, but its just logic.
"The goal of Skeptical Science is to explain what peer reviewed science has to say about global warming. When you peruse the many arguments of global warming skeptics, a pattern emerges. Skeptic arguments tend to focus on narrow pieces of the puzzle while neglecting the broader picture. For example, focus on Climategate emails neglects the full weight of scientific evidence for man-made global warming."
We focus on the lies and the little facts that can falsify arguments. Its up to the folks that are putting forth the hypothesis to come up with unfalsifiable evidence and its up to us to falsify those arguments. That's how science works. If anywhere in your hypothesis it says "2+2=5" and we point it out then we win. Its that simple. Climate fascists have to correct their work, not accuse us of not "looking at the broader picture". There have been some huge lies and/or errors. One can watch the movie Global Warming or Global Governance or The Great Global Warming Swindle to see what real climate scientists say about the practice of science inside the UN's IPCC.
We do not have to look at big pictures, only find little lies and sometimes big lies. Bad data collection is a form of lie. If the pro ACCer's are intentionally misleading and twisting and changing their arguments we only need to point that out.
This "about" section shows how little climate skeptics knows about science, or how stupid they think their readers are. More than likely, the latter.
Later in the same page it states:
"Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook, the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He studied physics at the University of Queensland, Australia. After graduating, he majored in solar physics in his post-grad honours year."
So obviously this guy isn't stupid when it comes to science. He just thinks his readers are.
You can never underestimate the greenies lack of understanding when it comes to science. Many claim to be looking at the science when they have only a bachelors degree in something like biology. Climate Science is applied math, and understood at this level by a very few. Fortunately, for our side, we only have to point out the lies and where they say "2+2=5". I know it doesn't seem fair to the twisted leftist mind, but its just logic.
