Afghanistan, Minerals and Natural Law

Lately there have been stories regarding the rich Afghan deposits of minerals. A reason for the war is tacitly suggested in this story.

This is careful perception management. The quickly catching on fact is that the Afghanistan war is a drug war that provides approximately 0.7 trillion per year in street value heroine. The land itself supposedly contains 1 trillion in minerals. Its never been extracted before and its been known about - simple reason - there are no sea ports or easy way of getting the minerals out of Afghanistan.

The organizations that rule the world operate at the sovereign level. No higher authority exists than the sovereign and sovereigns operate under natural law rather than civilized law. A wolf is a sovereign in the forest, it takes the lives of mice so that it can eat. This is nature. Countries going to war over resources is also nature.

The notion that we are fighting the Afghans to get their natural resources is much more palatable than the emerging truth: Our armies fight and kill there to get opium from which to help destroy western civilization- heroine goes into Europe. This is not a justification for war.

This perception management converts an unpalatable drug war war to a palatable one. Our leaders will not be perceived as drug lords but honest politicians looking out for our own interests.

The Afghanistan war is about drugs and drugs give profits which provides a means for black operations. The black operations are used to get IMF control over countries, so our banks can print their money and do to them what they have been doing to us. Not "our" banks, but the super wealthy class that is ruining our country with UN mandates, Agenda 21, etc all on behalf of the law merchant.

Perception management at the highest level cannot tolerate the emerging general knowledge that our armies are thugs for dope dealers.

Singularities In The Canadian Armed Forces In Afghanistan

I've heard this term thrown around lately, and I have heard that we are headed for an economic singularity. Its an odd term but I am familiar with it so I shall explain it. In control systems and communication theory in electrical engineering a singularity is a value for which a function cannot be described, it is a 1/0, such as in y = 1 / (x-1), the function has a singularity at x=1. Singularities are undefined entities that lead to great understanding, and define the behavior of an important class of systems.

The Canadian Armed Forces have seen 118 deaths in Afghanistan, mostly due to combat and road-side bombs from people our corporate controlled media call "insurgents", which is of course rediculous because we are invading them. There are a couple of singularities in Afghanistan that may explain the true nature of what is happening over there, and lead to important questions regarding truth is being hidden from Canadian citizens.

There has been no official reason given for the 2007 death of Maj. Raymond Ruckpaul, who was killed by a bullet wound in his Kabul sleeping quarters. The 2009 death of Maj. Michele Mendez also occurred in living quarters shortly after her promotion to major and the beginning of her second tour in Afghanistan. These two deaths also represent what some may call a singularity. They were the only two majors to die in Afghanistan, they both died in the quarters and there has not been an official explanation as to why or how they died. Was it suicide ? It certainly seems to be the case, but why ? Did they discover another singularity that makes absolutely no sense - that is the reason we are in Afghanistan ?

People of this rank must love the army, they likely do not go and then become sorry they went. The rank will lead to well paying jobs in civilian life - if all of the wars ever end. They are key decision makers and players very much in control of their game.

So what were the reasons for these apparent suicides ? Were these people privy to what is comming next ? Did they learn about the drug trade that is the real reason for us being there ?[1] Were they killed off because they would not go along with army plans after learning of them ?

I do not expect to ever know the reason for the seemingly unexplainable deaths of these two officers. Soldiers of a lower rank that die are just as important, but their deaths seem to be so much more explainable. The gunshot death of Bombardier Jérémie Ouellet in 2008 (22 yrs old) was admitted to be a suicide, so the military is not in the habit of hiding suicide deaths. But this suicide may be due to the fact that Ouellet perhaps didn't like the army and being ordered around to shoot people. He may have seen to much "adventure" for one person to handle. It seems to me that officers would have been screened to filter out those that could not psychologically handle all of the "adventure".

We will never know why Ruckpaul and Mendez died, just as we will never define one divided by zero and that in itself uncovers an important truth. The fact is that its none of our business, they don't work for us and we are supposed to forget or not care.

We have all these wars because we have income tax to pay for them. We pay the income tax for the single privilege of passing around that paper some call funny money to trade with and to have courts which cost us two or three hundred dollars per hour for "representation" by liars (lawyers) [2]. The income tax pays for the wars which ultimately lead to the citizens of the countries being invaded having the priviledge of using funny money in trade and paying income tax for this privelidge and ultimately to have more wars. Maybe this is the reality that these officers had to confront. Its carefully guarded secret by the liars as well as one judges are required to take secret judicial notice of in income tax avoidance trials[2]. Income tax doesn't pay for anything except war and funny money - human misery. All the other taxes pay for roads, police, hospitals and everything else our governments provide.

I hope that we don't forget one important thing, in many ways these soldiers represent the best of us. They put themselves in harms way to make the world a better place. Their lives had purpose. This is not just my opinion, its in The Report From Iron Mountain as well[3]. Its a sad fact that intelligent people with a sense of purpose are the best targets for our propagandists[4].

[1] Published UN statistics show the sharp decline in heroine production during July 2001 due to the Taliban burning crops and then the subsequent rise in opium production after the invasion (that was supposedly to look for the evil terrorist mastermind, Usama bin Laden). The opium exports have been steadily growing to be now over 700 billion per year. Dr. John Coleman in Conspirators Hierarchy says that the Royal Bank of Canada is involved in drug money laundering.

[2] George Mercier Invisible Contracts

[3] The Report From Iron Mountain is widely available for free on the web.

[4] Jaques Ellul, Propaganda: The Formation of Attitudes