Is it Jews or the BAR association, or is it the nature of a technological society, human nature or politicians? Is it the banksters ?
I think its a combination of factors, first of all I think the technological society is a creation of the the rulers (banksters) for the purpose of enslaving us. Wars are created to speed up technological development, concentrate "wealth", keep people distracted, angry and sometimes dead while a monster (technological society - Frankenstein) is built up around us. This monster continuously demands more and more control because the modern man, "Homo-Economus"[1] demands, above all else comfort and safety where his counterpart, homo sapien sought truth and justice from his gods. His gods served him well, keeping him humble and the machine at bay.
The control that is required by the technological society is demanded by the technicians (actuaries, economists, engineers, big corporations) so they can plan for the future created by the banksters - its their gig. They print little pieces of paper with numbers on it calling it money. They control the future so that the technicians can plan for it. Plans enslave us by limiting freedom. Homo Economus becomes the subject of his plans.
The BAR backs the banksters up and makes the paper into money with the law. Politicians don't make laws, the law is a separate entity, the "law" is the UCC - the uniform commercial code created to protect commerce on the high seas, now on the land, its Administrative law and Equity courts, it almost never has a jury. There is value in dishonor and this value is converted to illuminati/satanist debt notes by the courts. Money is the god of Homo-Economus.
The judges decide law in equity courts, using what the politicians wrote as law as only a guide. In Equity law the judge excercises discretion. In administrative law, the law consists of administering the law along with public policy and the benefit of all (communism). Most people study administrative law in law school. The real law, as applied today, is nothing like the old common law that we see on Law and Order and other TV shows.
So its money that controls us, provides the element of control necessary to keep the machine running. But its the BAR that gives us the foundation of "justice" that society sits on, that Homo-Economus believes in. The BAR gives the illuminati/satanist debt notes value through enforcement of law and its men with guns. They enforce the tax laws and trick people into their jails for not paying the criminal, immoral and Marxist income tax. Income tax pays for more war and the machine gets bigger.
Justice and the machine are incompatible, the BAR works for the banksters who operate the machine through planning done by their tax free foundations and secretive think tanks. So justice loses because the BAR association works for the banks too. BAR association members are rich by the standard of the common excrement shoveler - they are paid off, not paid, to keep the machine running as it does for the banksters so the technicians can keep planning. Bar members laugh all the way to the banks, their pay cheques are high because they allow themselves to keep their numbers low.
Its the Jews that get to be the scapegoats for the BAR (British Association Registry). Everything the Jews have been accused of doing in secret has been openly practiced by the BAR. At the bottom of every rabbit hole you find yourself wading through weasel excrement. The courts have the final word. BAR members speak with a forked tongue -their words have double meaning. They create and manage the foundation of our society. They have the monopoly on justice which is the foundation on which society sits.
Its the BAR that locks up people like Earnst Zundel and makes the Jews look bad. The need to make the machine bigger means more war and more propaganda to keep everyones eye off the ball.
If this post sounds disconnected, sorry, when wading through weasel excrement its difficult to know what you are stepping on. Can anyone straighten out all this UCC, Equity Law, Administrative Law nonsense ? No way. Maybe they can't either, they just keep laughing all the way to the banks knowing they can say whatever your interpretation is must be wrong because they have the monopoly, they say what is and what isn't.
If anyone can falsify this, please do so. Tell me where I am wrong. I want to figure this machine out. This is a working theory and I am looking for falsification.
[1] Term used in The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul.
Showing posts with label Politicians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politicians. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Why Are Politicians Seemingly So Corrupt ?
I learned this yesterday - probably one of the most important things I ever heard - from Gordon Schiller. You would be amazed at what you could learn from Mr. Schiller. Our society runs on contract law. Everything is by contract, but people do not know this and that is fundamentally why we are in so much trouble. There are some very important contracts in society that we are unaware of and we could easily fill our obligations and clean up society completely - with a few signatures. Not a single shot fired. Imagine that.
Imagine if someone was running up and down your street saying "I'm going to cut everyones lawn for free" He kept on doing this then after a week or so just dis-appeared. Everyone would sort of thing the guy is a wing-nut and that their lawns will not be cut. People would laugh about it on Saturday nights and the incident would get soon forgotten.
Suppose someone went out and accepted the offer ? Just said "OK buddy, you can cut my lawn. Thankyou very much, awfully kind of you" and all that. That guy would get his lawn cut.
Afetr we elect politicians they swear an oath. But we don't accept it and thats why the oath means nothing. Its that simple.
So here is the oath:
"I, A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to
Her Majesty Queen Victoria."
Oh Oh. Thats not to Canada ! But wait a minute. What's Canada ? Canada is a private for profit corporation. It has jurisdiction in the waterways surrounding Canada. You volunteer to go into Canada when you go to court and state to the judge that you understand [stand under] the charges. Without them bringing you under the jurisdiction of Canada Inc., they have none. The trick they play is called the Penumbra Doctrine. When you stand under corporate rule you lose all your rights. The lawyer and the judge work to trick you into Penumbra. Judges do lots of yelling and show-boating to trick and scare you. Canada has no oath to you.
So what oath does the Queen have ? Its called the coronantion oath and it gets violated as well. Why ? Likely because no one has accepted it...
Its a nice oath and I feel pretty safe under it. Its the oath not the person...
I haven't got it all figured out yet, but when it gets simple you are usually close. I have depended on lots of great work by ex judges and real brainy and caring people to get this understanding. Its so simple I wonder why I didn't see this all myself.
Imagine if someone was running up and down your street saying "I'm going to cut everyones lawn for free" He kept on doing this then after a week or so just dis-appeared. Everyone would sort of thing the guy is a wing-nut and that their lawns will not be cut. People would laugh about it on Saturday nights and the incident would get soon forgotten.
Suppose someone went out and accepted the offer ? Just said "OK buddy, you can cut my lawn. Thankyou very much, awfully kind of you" and all that. That guy would get his lawn cut.
Afetr we elect politicians they swear an oath. But we don't accept it and thats why the oath means nothing. Its that simple.
So here is the oath:
"I, A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to
Her Majesty Queen Victoria."
Oh Oh. Thats not to Canada ! But wait a minute. What's Canada ? Canada is a private for profit corporation. It has jurisdiction in the waterways surrounding Canada. You volunteer to go into Canada when you go to court and state to the judge that you understand [stand under] the charges. Without them bringing you under the jurisdiction of Canada Inc., they have none. The trick they play is called the Penumbra Doctrine. When you stand under corporate rule you lose all your rights. The lawyer and the judge work to trick you into Penumbra. Judges do lots of yelling and show-boating to trick and scare you. Canada has no oath to you.
So what oath does the Queen have ? Its called the coronantion oath and it gets violated as well. Why ? Likely because no one has accepted it...
Its a nice oath and I feel pretty safe under it. Its the oath not the person...
I haven't got it all figured out yet, but when it gets simple you are usually close. I have depended on lots of great work by ex judges and real brainy and caring people to get this understanding. Its so simple I wonder why I didn't see this all myself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
My Blog List
Followers
About Me
- Doug Plumb
- Author of "Power Outage", available on Smashwords. I am a 50 year old free market libertarian who has had the time to read and consider the nature of globalism and the big machine that is surrounding us. I have participated in politics by running at the Fed level and debated Agenda 21 and 9-11 truth in front of large audiences. My background is in engineering and software creation. My business has provided me with significant time and freedom to learn the truth about the world around us. My goal is to expose Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development and Cultural Marxism.