Friday, December 30, 2011

From Ron Paul

I received this letter from Ron Paul from an attorney who sends out regular, very informative list serve on email. Her name is Connie Fogal and she was a key member of the Canadian Action Party in the context in which I knew her.

 I agree with these people regarding the symptoms of what we face, but like Alex Jones, Paul Craig Roberts, Bob Chapman, Dr. Stan Monteith, Alan Watt (The Canadian- www.cuttingthroughthematrix.ca), and the rest of the Patriot movement, they ignore the basic problem at its core.

The sum of human experience consists of space, time, good and evil. Our left brains are concerned with space and time, this is the domain of science and mathematics. The right brain deals with good and evil, this is the domain of art, literature, music and humour, the subjects that deal with the nature of good and evil. No philosopher breaks down human experience in the way that Immanual Kant does and this material is explained, not in these words, but fully and completely, in an oblique way, in his Critique Of Pure Reason- at least that's what I get from it.

As art, literature, music and humour are destroyed, as we no longer apply reason to the nature of good and evil, we defer to power, making it absolute. Absolute power corrupts the human experience in the context of consciousness itself, it destroys consciousness of what is good and evil. The fundamental tenet of Marxism is that consciousness never existed before society, but consciousness he must surely mean the knowledge of good and evil. As we no longer apply reason to the problems of good and evil, but defer to authority in these matters, society, as we know it gets destroyed.

There are nihilists and anti-nihilists, ones that are in favour of the destruction of society and ones that are not. The nihilists believe that human experience has become sterile, we no longer have great stories to tell. Life is dull and boring. I believe this is true, we will become weak in the long run, eventually becoming creatures that eat potatoe chips and sit around watching TV - figuratively speaking.  I am an anti nihilist, not because I disagree with these ideas but because of the fact that these changes that need to occur are being brought about by children who will only destroy themselves in the end as well as the rest of us.

The only solution is for us to learn to apply reason to the nature of good and evil, to recognize that sending soldiers overseas to kill people they have never met based on the threat of terrorism, such as we pretend to see in the 9/11 attacks is pure insanity at a most basic level. Anyone with any brains, or any guts, can see 9/11 was an inside job. Most people defer to authority and do not protest paying for the wars. Wars are patriotic, wars are good - wars give us culture. Really it is not wars that give us culture, it is our knowledge of good and evil that give us art music, literature and humour.

The solution is to begin to learn the meaning of our words. This was John Lockes famous hypothesis, that conflict occurs primarily through misunderstanding (modern life gave us the psychopath, making this sometimes impossible) but if we began by learning the difference between a lawyer and an attorney, the necessity of continuing this learning would become apparent.

We would soon no longer be burdened with a debt that in reality does not exist. It is a maxim of law that debtors have no rights. Law is the child of reason, not authority. WE displace law with the legal system. Law preserves the natural right of man, the legal system preserves the natural right of kings by making us acknowledge a phoney debt as real, thus giving up our rights.

Our money isn't really debt money, as we are lead to believe - its not even money. It contains no intrinsic value, has no promise backing it. The only thing that makes it worth anything is our willingness to work for it.  Therefore there is no national debt. This debt exists in in the imagination of attorneys and totalitarian government idealogues and tyrants. We have not given up our natural right because of the debt unless we choose to defer to authority rather than reason.

There is nothing new about the rights being claimed by the president below, they are the rights of a debt holder over a debtor. We will be destroyed by a police state because we no longer apply reason to the problem of good and evil, but defer to authority.

Immanual Kant, in his essay called "What Is Enlightenment" explains the nature of freedom and the necessity of having the courage to (in his words translated from German), "have the courage to use your own reason". Unlike most of Kant's writings "What Is Enlightenment" is very easy to read and understand.

Here is the letter from Ron Paul:

Little by little, in the name of fighting terrorism, our Bill of Rights is being repealed. The 4th amendment has been rendered toothless by the PATRIOT Act. No more can we truly feel secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects when now there is an exception that fits nearly any excuse for our government to search and seize our property. Of course, the vast majority of Americans may say “I’m not a terrorist, so I have no reason to worry.” However, innocent people are wrongly accused all the time. The Bill of Rights is there precisely because the founders wanted to set a very high bar for the government to overcome in order to deprive an individual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is to endanger everyone. When the bar is low enough to include political enemies, our descent into totalitarianism is virtually assured.
The PATRIOT Act, as bad is its violation of the 4th Amendment, was just one step down the slippery slope. The recently passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) continues that slip toward tyranny and in fact accelerates it significantly. The main section of concern, Section 1021 of the NDAA Conference Report, does to the 5th Amendment what the PATRIOT Act does to the 4th. The 5th Amendment is about much more than the right to remain silent in the face of government questioning. It contains very basic and very critical stipulations about due process of law. The government cannot imprison a person for no reason and with no evidence presented or access to legal counsel.
The dangers in the NDAA are its alarmingly vague, undefined criteria for who can be indefinitely detained by the US government without trial. It is now no longer limited to members of al Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyone accused of “substantially supporting” such groups or “associated forces.” How closely associated? And what constitutes “substantial” support? What if it was discovered that someone who committed a terrorist act was once involved with a charity? Or supported a political candidate? Are all donors of that charity or supporters of that candidate now suspect, and subject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity now an associated force?
Additionally, this legislation codifies in law for the first time authority to detain Americans that has to this point only been claimed by President Obama. According to subsection (e) of section 1021, “[n]othing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” This means the president’s widely expanded view of his own authority to detain Americans indefinitely even on American soil is for the first time in this legislation codified in law. That should chill all of us to our cores.
The Bill of Rights has no exemptions for “really bad people” or terrorists or even non-citizens. It is a key check on government power against any person. That is not a weakness in our legal system; it is the very strength of our legal system. The NDAA attempts to justify abridging the bill of rights on the theory that rights are suspended in a time of war, and the entire Unites States is a battlefield in the War on Terror. This is a very dangerous development indeed. Beware.












Thursday, March 10, 2011

Central Bankers

I was in a beamer with a luciferian lawyer about fifteen years ago and she expressed a similar desire to what you see in the video below as a young woman was crossing the street with a baby. I know the conspiracy is real from my own personal experience seeing Canadian lawyers laugh about it.

The video below shows a central banker from Brazil running over a group of bicyclists. There really aren't any words...






Monday, January 24, 2011

Thirty Little Known Facts

(my comments are in brackets. I haven't checked these references)

(For those that have trouble understanding the significance of this post, read Kants three page essay 'What Is Enlightenment', posted below this post)

1. The IRS is NOT a U.S. Government Agency.  It is an Agency of the IMF.
            Diversified Metal Products v IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.I.

            Public Law 94-564
            Senate Report 94-1148, pg 5967
            Reorganization Plan #26
            Public Law 102-391

2. The IMF is an Agency of the U.N.
            Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg 816

3. The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921.
            41 Stat. Ch. 214 page 654 

4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF.
            Presidential Documents Volume 29 No. 4 page 113
            22 U.S.C. 285-288

5. The U.S. does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States.  No more reorganizations.  After 200 years of  bankruptcy it is finally over.
            Executive Order 12803

    (There has been a series of three bankruptcies, the first one with the creation of the constitution, the second with the land confisgation, the third in 1933- people being sureties for the debt. The 70 year bankruptcies were to end according to old testament law of countries and bankruptcies- 9/11 distracted us from the end of the third bankruptcy.)

  6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NSA and all of the other Alphabet Gangs were never part of the U.S. Government, even though the 'U.S. Government held stock in said 'Agencies.
            U.S. v. Strang, 254 U.S. 491
            Lewis v. U.S., 680 F.2d, 1239

  7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF.

  The application for an SSN is the SS5 form.  The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5, not the 'Social Security Administration.  The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are Department of Treasury.
            20 CFR Chap. 111 Subpart B 422.103 (b)

   8. There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. 'Judges do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes.
            FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464
            Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428
            1 Stat. 138-178
  
  9. There have NOT been any 'Judges in America since 1789. There have only been Administrators.
            FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464
            Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428
            1 Stat. 138-178

  10. According to GATT you MUST have a Social Security Number.
            House Report 103-826

  11. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations.  Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that 'New York City is the Capital of the World.  For once, he told the truth.
            20 CFR Chap. 111 subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)

  12. Social Security is NOT insurance or a contract.  Nor is there a 'Trust  Fund.
            Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619
            Steward Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548

  13. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an  Agency of the United Nations.
  Examine one: top-left should be written 'United States Treasury see 2-4 above.
  
  14. You own NO property. Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours.  You are listed as a TENANT.  Often times the Mortgage Holder or the State is listed as Seised in demesne as of fee.
            Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session Seised in demesne as of fee.  This is the strict technical expression used to describe the ownership in 'an estate in fee-simple in possession in a corporeal hereditament.  The word 'seised is used to express the 'seisin or owner's possession of a freehold property; the phrase 'in demesne, or 'in his demesne, (in dominico suo) signifies that he's seized as owner of the land itself, and not merely of the seigniory services; and the concluding words, 'as of fee, import that he is seised of an estate of inheritance in fee-simple.  Where the subject is incorporeal, or the estate expectant on a precedent freehold, the words 'in his demesne are omitted. (Co. Litt. 17a; Fleta, 1.5, c. 5,    18;
  Bract. 1.4, tr. 5, c. 2,    2) Brown.  "Black's Law Dictionary Fourth Edition, page 1523.
 
  15. The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
            42 Pa. C.S.A. 502

  16. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary  War.
            Treaty of Versailles   July 16, 1782
            Treaty of Peace 8 Stat. 80
 
  17. You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it.
  Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor & Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14  Georgia 438, 520
 
  18. America is a British Colony.  The 'United States is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796.
            Respublica v. Sweers, 1 Dallas 43
            Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116
            Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80
            IRS Publication 6209
            Articles of Association October 20, 1774
 
  19. Britain is owned by the Vatican.
            Treaty of 1213(there is some dispute over this and the existance of the Magna - Carta)
 
  20. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States.
            Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54

  21. A 1040 Form is for Tribute paid to Britain.
            IRS Publication 6209

  22. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of Conquest and Discovery.  (Ever wonder why an Attorney, who is an Agent of the Pope through the International Bar Association, wants to do 'discovery with you?)
            Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493
  
  23. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of Millions of people.
            Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493
  
  24. The Pope's 'Laws are obligatory on everyone.
            Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii., n.4. Prati, 1844
            Syllabus prop 28, 29, 44
 
  25. We are SLAVES and own ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.  Not even what we think are 'our children.
            Tillman v. Roberts, 108 So. 62
            Van Koten v. Van Koten, 154 N.E. 146
           Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session
            Wynehammer v. People, 13 N.Y. Rep 378, 481 

  26. Military Dictator George Washington divided up the States
  (Estates) into Districts.
            Messages and Papers of the Presidents, Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary definition of 'Estate
 
   27. 'We, The People does NOT include the General Populace, or what you THINK is 'We, The People.
            Barron v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243
 
  28. It is NOT the 'duty of the police to protect you.  Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest Code Breakers.
            Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So.2nd. 363
            Reiff v. City of Philla., 477 F.Supp. 1262
            Lynch v. NC Dept. of Justice, 376 S.E.2nd. 247 
 (You must agree to 'stand-under' their charges, by 'understanding'. The word understand has a long and complex definition that means stand-under. Otherwise you are not under contract with them)

  29. Everything in the 'United States is up For Sale: Bridges,
  Roads, Water, Schools, Hospitals, Prisons, Airports, etc.
  Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?
            Executive Order 12803 

  30. 'WE are HUMAN CAPITAL.
            Executive Order 13037

  The U.N. has financed the operations of the 'United States Government for over 50 years and now 'owns every man, woman, and child in America.  The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.

  Why is the above so difficult for most people to understand?  Simple: words like 'person, 'citizen, 'people, 'or, 'nation, 'is,  'fact, 'authority, 'truth, 'nation, 'crime, 'fraud, 'charge, 'right, 'statute, 'preferred, 'assume, 'prefer, 'constitutor, 'creditor, 'debtor, 'debit, 'discharge, 'payment, 'law, 'United States, and hundreds of others do NOT mean what you think they mean and you were never taught the 'Legal Definitions so you would 'Understand that you DON'T understand.

(This is applied sophistry -lie-able, re-present, attorney  are two others. Think about lie-ability. Attourneys attourn your wealth, for this they must attourn your natural right, lawyers argue law.)

  Don't let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free.

  You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind.

(Forced slavery is illegal, you must ascent to it, this ascent is the belief of an obligation created with sophistry and illusion. The vampire must be invited in - he cannot break your door down. Else he could break the door down at the wrong house.

 The lower level establishment is one of monkeys that do not know the laws and are only capable of following orders. Reason demands reason and is the key to the preservation of natural right. Those of us that evolved from monkeys believe themselves to be a part of a massive chemical reaction that started
with the 'big bang' cosmological theory, do not have free will and therefore the ability to reason and therefore the ability of contract. Everything occurs by causation according to the monkey. They care not what they do. To them, intelligence is synonymous to following instruction, not the application of reason. The Enlightenment ended, we are in the Counter-Enlightenment)

  When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Brittan and the Vatican are Corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed in your mind, you will understand our slavery is because we believe in fictions. Stephen Ammes, author The Ultimate Delusion

  The Illusion is MUCH larger than the irrefutable 30 points above, and the 30 points above are not even the tip of the tip of the iceberg.  For more information, see:

  www.atgpress.com
  www.TheAmericanVoice.com
  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=IRS+is+a+Fraud
  www.ZeitgeistMovie.com
  www.FreedomToFascism.com
  http://www.myspace.com/KC7AQK
  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=911+Truth+Movement
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klwWcp9eiPw&feature=related

Monday, January 10, 2011

Reason & Natural Right

Today, in my daily Kantian study session my mind began to wander and consider the relationship between natural right and reason (I'm still studying the Critique of Pure Reason and will be for the forseeable future). I began to think of the Enlightenment, where man began to use reason to break the shackles of authoritarian control.

So I wondered, what would Kant say about the Enlightenment and  read his essay called "An Answer To The Question: What Is Enlightenment ?", here is the first few paragraphs of this great essay - see how it parallels the freedom movement of today while written in 1784, the Sage of K√∂nigsberg had this to say:

(from the Great Ideas Penguin Books series)

******************************************

An Answer To The Question: What Is Enlightenment ?


Enlightenment in mans emergence from his self incurred immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use ones own understanding without the guidance of another. This immaturity is self incurred if its cause is not the lack of understanding, but the lack of resolution and courage to use it without guidance of another. The motto of enlightenment is therefore Sapere aude ! [Dare to be wise !] Have courage to use your own understanding !

Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large proportion of men, even when nature has long emancipated them from alien guidance (naturaliter maiorennes [Those who have come of age by virtue of nature]) nevertheless  gladly remain immature for life. For the same reasons, it is all to easy for others to set themselves up as their guardians. It is so convenient to be immature ! If I have a book to have understanding in place of me, a spiritual adviser to have conscience for me, a doctor to judge my diet for me, and so on, I need not mae any efforts at all. I need not think, so long as I can pay; others will soon enough take the tiresone job over for me. The guardians who have kindly taken upon themselves the work of supervision will soon see to it that by far the largest part of mankind (including the entire fair sex) should consider the step forward to maturity not only as difficult but also as highly dangerous. Having first infatuated their domestic animals, and carefully prevented the docile creatures from daring to take a single step without the leading strings to which they are tied, they next show them the danger which threatens them if they walk unaided. Now this danger is not in fact so very great, for they would certainly learn to walk after a few falls. But an example of this kind is intimidating, and usually frightens them off from further attempts.

Thus it is difficult for each separate individual to work his way out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown fond of it and is really incapable for the time being of using his own understanding, because he was never allowed to make an attempt. Dogmas and formulas, those mechanical instruments for rational use (or rather misuse) of his natural endowments, are the ball and chain of his permanent immaturity. And if anyone did throw them off, he would still be uncertain about jumping over even the narrowest of trenches, for he would be unaccustomed to free movement of this kind. Thus, only a few, by cultivating their own minds, have succeeded in freeing themselves from immaturity and in continuing boldly on their way.

....


This has been 1 pages of a 3 page essay that can be found here: What Is Enlightenment ?

******************************************

This is the embodiment of the message of the freeman movement, none of these people that started this movement have ever quoted Kant to my knowledge, what is written in this 18th century essay is in the hearts and minds of people today who wish to remove themselves from the shackles of government slavery, to not be the cause of wars, pestilence and disease and not to be victimized by the forces of sophistry, licentiousness and intimidation, the three pillars that hold up the institution of modern slavery.










Followers

About Me

My photo
Author of "Power Outage", available on Smashwords. I am a 50 year old free market libertarian who has had the time to read and consider the nature of globalism and the big machine that is surrounding us. I have participated in politics by running at the Fed level and debated Agenda 21 and 9-11 truth in front of large audiences. My background is in engineering and software creation. My business has provided me with significant time and freedom to learn the truth about the world around us. My goal is to expose Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development and Cultural Marxism.