Thursday, December 30, 2010

Bob Raes Depression

Yeah, I'm depressed too. After dealing with the Law Society Of Upper Canada and trying to report crimes committed in full public view by a lawyer and having my witness advised by his lawyer to stay out of it left me in a state of awareness as to how thoroughly rotten and corrupt our society really is. This awareness has lead me down a path of further awareness over the past nine years that would drive anyone to depression or else a puzzle factory where they can be experimented on by psychiatrists and turn themselves over to the meat grinder indefinitely.

The battle between materialists and "idealists" has been won by the materialists and the evolutionists and Eugenie Scott has whipped up the very forces of corruption, the forces of sophistry, licentiousness and intimidation, our courts, to defend her un-scientifically defendable theories on evolution[1]. Now these corrupt lawyers and politicians have become illusionary in that they believe they are gods, when really they are just dumb monkeys for those truly in control.

As Marcus Aurelius and many others have said, materialism is for the commoners. The people in political "power" are so obsessed with their aesthetic lives and their illusions of power that they are willing to flush all of humanity down a big paper toilet rather than allow the wealthiest of people to be exposed to the competition that ordinary people might provide.

So who thinks Bob will go to a psychiatrist and get some meds ? I don't, I wouldn't either, but any professional would advise you or me to.So much for professionals.

 Thanks to Bob Rae and others just like him (those who attourn our natural right over to banksters), depression will likely grow  - along with wars (to export our brand of paper corruption based on fear and hate) , pestilence (statutes, acts, licenses) and disease (vaccines, fluoridated water, GMO foods) because our owners want things to be this way.

And I'm ashamed to be a member of this species- this is fundamentally why I'm depressed. A squirrel does a better job of preserving its natural right than most of humanity, who can simply be fed with a big screen TV. And that is depressing.

[1] See Phlagellum Bacteria (it falsifies evolution)

Thursday, December 2, 2010

CAFR Basics

Basics are:

1. Government (Senators; Congressmen; Governors, etc. in the loop) have promoted budget reports to the public and budget reports primarily show where tax income is taken and then applied. Also a budget report is designed around a one year projection. With government doing this they have created the impression they survive off of tax income. And yes the state treasurer and legislators know this more or less based on their degree of involvement with the investment funds and enterprise operations.

2. The true accounting is the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report). The CAFR shows gross income for the whole picture. Tax; investment; and enterprise. Additionally it is not showing "for the year" but the end result of decades of growth. When a CAFR is completely digested in many cases a local government is bringing in more each year from investment income then tax income. Keep in mind what taxation is, it is a revenue source just as investment and enterprise income is also.

3. There has been an organized blackout by government; the syndicated media; education and both political parties over the last 65 years NOT to mention the CAFR and to only mention the selectively created budget reports due to the money and power behind the wealth shown in the CAFRs. Substantial wealth that has allowed for the systematic takeover by investment of the banks; insurance companies; fortune 500 companies, ect., done a little bit by little bit each year over decades to where collective government has more ownership and wealth generation than Russia ever dreamed about in the 30's and 40's. Keep in mind the reason you have a void in your comprehension per this issue over your lifetime is due to the maintained blackout orchestrated due to the money involved. You were not meant to know. If the public knew this was going on they would have stopped it 50 years ago. But being that the orchestration was so effective collective government HAS taken it all over by investment and the blackout continues.

4. What I bring forward per the TRF (Tax Retirement Funds) is that just in like as a government pension fund pays a salary and benefits at retirement TRF funds can be established to pay (replacement revenue source for taxation) any local government's expenses and thus taxation can be phased out and eliminated.This will not be easy being that the collective power base established by government acting as a "corporate" fine tuned watch at this time through their takeover of it all over the last century makes the Roman empire look like kids selling lemonade on the street corner in comparison. Also being run by attorneys doting the "I's" and crossing the "T's" to walk with massive cash now and at the same time locking in the productivity value of the next seven generations as the public is masterfully entertained in La -La land for distraction value designed to maintain the void in comprehension for the public not to have a cognitive thought as to the basics I brought forward above and done so again DUE TO THE MONEY AND CONTROL INVOLVED.

The above are the four points that are as simplistic and clear as I can make it.

Walter Burien - CAFR1
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Police State USA: TSA Gestapo Empire

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

URL of this article:

Global Research, November 23, 2010

It doesn’t take a bureaucrat long to create an empire. John Pistole, the FBI agent who took over the Transportation Security Administration on July 1 told USA Today 16 days later that protecting trains and subways from terrorist attacks will be as high a priority for him as air travel.

It is difficult to imagine New Yorkers being porno-screened and sexually groped on crowed subway platforms or showing up an hour or two in advance for clearance for a 15 minute subway ride, but once bureaucrats get the bit in their teeth they take absurdity to its logical conclusion. Buses will be next, although it is even more difficult to imagine open air bus stops turned into security zones with screeners and gropers inspecting passengers before they board.

Will taxi passengers be next? In those Muslim lands whose citizens the US government has been slaughtering for years, favorite weapons for retaliating against the Americans are car and truck bombs. How long before Pistole announces that the TSA Gestapo is setting up roadblocks on city streets, highways and interstates to check cars for bombs? That 15 minute trip to the grocery store then becomes an all day affair.

Indeed, it has already begun. Last September agents from Homeland Security, TSA, and the US Department of Transportation, assisted by the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, conducted a counter-terrorism operation on busy Interstate 20 just west of Atlanta, Georgia. Designated VIPER (Visible Inter-mobile Prevention and Response), the operation required all trucks to stop to be screened for bombs. Federal agents used dogs, screening devices, and a large drive-through bomb detection machine. Imagine what the delays did to delivery schedules and truckers’ bottom lines.

There are also news reports of federal trucks equipped with backscatter X-ray devices that secretly scan cars and pedestrians.

With such expensive counter-terrorism activities, both in terms of the hard-pressed taxpayers’ money and civil liberties, one would think that bombs were going off all over America. But, of course, they aren’t. There has not been a successful terrorist act since 9/11, and thousands of independent experts doubt the government’s explanation of that event.

Subsequent domestic terrorist events have turned out to be FBI sting operations in which FBI agents organize not-so-bright disaffected members of society and lead them into displaying interest in participating in a terrorist act. Once the FBI agent, pretending to be a terrorist, succeeds in prompting all the right words to be said and captured on his hidden recorder, the “terrorists” are arrested and the “plot” exposed.

The very fact that the FBI has to orchestrate fake terrorism proves the absence of real terrorists.

If Americans were more thoughtful and less gullible, they might wonder why all the emphasis on transportation when there are so many soft targets. Shopping centers, for example. If there were enough terrorists in America to justify the existence of Homeland Security, bombs would be going off round the clock in shopping malls in every state. The effect would be far more terrifying than blowing up an airliner.

Indeed, if terrorists want to attack air travelers, they never need to board an airplane.

All they need to do is to join the throngs of passengers waiting to go through the TSA scanners and set off their bombs. The TSA has conveniently assembled the targets.

The final proof that there are no terrorists is that not a single neoconservative or government official responsible for the Bush regime’s invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and the Obama regime’s slaughters of Pakistanis, Yemenis, and Somalians has been assassinated. None of these Americans who are responsible for lies, deceptions, and invasions that have destroyed the lives of countless numbers of Muslims have any security protection. If Muslims were capable of pulling off 9/11, they are certainly capable of assassinating Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby, Condi Rice, Kristol, Bolton, Goldberg, and scores of others during the same hour of the same day.

I am not advocating that terrorists assassinate anyone. I am just making the point that if the US was as overrun with terrorists as empire-building bureaucrats pretend, we would definitely be experiencing dramatic terrorist acts. The argument is not believable that a government that was incapable of preventing 9/11 is so all-knowing that it can prevent assassination of unprotected neocons and shopping malls from being bombed.

If Al Qaeda was anything like the organization that the US government claims, it would not be focused on trivial targets such as passenger airliners. The organization, if it exists, would be focused on its real enemies. Try to imagine the propaganda value of terrorists wiping out the neoconservatives in one fell swoop, followed by an announcement that every member of the federal government down to the lowest GS, every member of the House and Senate, and every governor was next in line to be bumped off.

This would be real terrorism instead of the make-belief stuff associated with shoe bombs that don’t work, underwear bombs that independent experts say could not work, and bottled water and shampoo bombs that experts say cannot possibly be put together in airliner lavatories.

Think about it. Would a terror organization capable of outwitting all 16 US intelligence agencies, all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel’s Mossad, the National Security Council, NORAD, air traffic control, the Pentagon, and airport security four times in one hour put its unrivaled prestige at risk with improbable shoe bombs, shampoo bombs, and underwear bombs?

After success in destroying the World Trade Center and blowing up part of the Pentagon, it is an extraordinary comedown to go after a mere airliner. Would a person who gains fame by knocking out the world heavyweight boxing champion make himself a laughing stock by taking lunch money from school boys?

TSA is a far greater threat to Americans than are terrorists. Pistole has given the finger to US senators and representatives, state legislators, and the traveling public who have expressed their views that virtual strip searches and sexual molestation are too high a price to pay for “security.” Indeed, the TSA with its Gestapo attitude and methods, is succeeding in making Americans more terrified of the TSA than they are of terrorists.

Make up your own mind. What terrifies you the most. Terrorists, who in all likelihood you will never encounter in your lifetime, or the TSA that you will encounter every time you fly and soon, according to Pistole, every time you take a train, a subway, or drive in a car or truck?

Before making up your mind, consider this report from on November 19: “TSA officials say that anyone refusing both the full body scanners and the enhanced pat down procedures will be taken into custody. Once there the detainees will not only be barred from flying, but will be held indefinitely as suspected terrorists . . . One sheriff’s office said they were already preparing to handle a large number of detainees and plan to treat them as terror suspects.”

Who is cowing Americans into submission, terrorists or the TSA Gestapo?

Please support Global Research
Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.

Your endorsement is greatly appreciated

Subscribe to the Global Research e-newsletter

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

All Along The Watchtower

"There must be some way out of here," said the joker to the thief,
"There's too much confusion, I can't get no relief.
Businessmen, they drink my wine, plowmen dig my earth,
None of them along the line know what any of it is worth."

"No reason to get excited," the thief, he kindly spoke,

"There are many here among us who feel that life is but a joke.
But you and I, we've been through that, and this is not our fate,
So let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting late."

All along the watchtower, princes kept the view

While all the women came and went, barefoot servants, too.

Outside in the distance a wildcat did growl,

Two riders were approaching, the wind began to howl

Of course we know that the public education teachings of evolution must be based on bullshit after looking at examples of other public teachings such as Keynesian economics, global warming, political "science" (no mention that the country is bankrupt and under ch 11 control of creditors) , the legal system (wooden yoke slavery)  as law, and the new math.

But why ? First of all, no one has shown how a more complex DNA can evolve from a simpler one, secondly, anyone who speaks against Darwinism is expelled from the established system ( see Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed by Ben Stein), but mostly because of the content in this movie: Expelled or Unlocking the Mysteries of Life

Expelled or Unlocking the Mysteries Of Life gives a close up view of the mechanical behaviour of cells using computer graphics that shows rotating machinery of the Flagellum bacteria. The machinery that is built into cells, if this movie is true, makes Darwinian evolution impossible to believe. This is one of those life altering experiences rather than just another movie- like learning about where meat, babies and money come from. It will alter your view of the universe - especially if you were a Darwinian before seeing this.

Monday, November 8, 2010


       A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board  of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
       B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!
       Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
II.    The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:
        1. ONLY authorizes,
        A. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
        B. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT.
        2. INFANTS
        A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.
        B. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!
        A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"
        1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.
        2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license.  ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.
         1. See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter.
         2. As per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office!
IV.    The State Bar is;
        A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.
        C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.
        D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing.  ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!
        E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas.
V.    State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . .
        Enrollment in the State Bar:  "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW.
        It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of Texas and America.  The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with treasonous goals in mind.  They have accomplished 98% of their goals.  The NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW.  American People start the job for them...or before their "NEW WORLD ORDER" bosses, the International Bankers, gain the remaining 2%.  Texas and American Lawyers should check historical records.  They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in a power shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers and judges...for they always have proven themselves unworthy of any trust from either side!
        "Woe unto you (A woe is a curse) Lawyers!  For you have taken away the key of knowledge; you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered..."  Luke 11:52.
         The founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution and formed our government, made it very clear that this was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE country and all Citizens are to be equal under Law and not a private capitalistic monopoly or cartel as they had experienced in Europe.
        Under free enterprise system, any Citizen who was willing to risk his time and finances, can go into business.  The public with the freedom of choice, can patronize this business or decide they don't like the service or product and stay away; whereas, in a private or a capitalistic system, only the privileged elite can go into certain businesses or professions such as had been practiced in Europe for ages, making the public their CAPTIVE CUSTOMERS.
        The EUROPEAN BANKERS and FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to change AMERICA to the same system that they had so they could take over this government too, and sent some British lawyers over here to organize an American Bar Association on the same order as the English Bar where only Lords can be Judges and determine who shall practice law.
        In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws.  At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.
VII.    The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons.  They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization.  California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives.  Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class.  This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws.
        What is the real difference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white robes and fiery crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACK ROBES sitting on the bench?  Aren't they as dictatorial as the KGB and the GESTAPO are accused of being?  This has fulfilled Orwell's prediction for 1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT.
        Various groups that have been lawfully stoned walled by the ABA and the courts suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish the Bar Association as there are 17 states where Citizens have the Right to do this by the voting process.  If we can do this it will destroy, the power of the Bar in America with similar method they used to gain their power, state by state.  Any Citizens who live in one of these 17 states, can do this, and if not in one of these states you can contribute to other states that can.
        Who is going to run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR?  The CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAW non-Union COUNSELORS.  I would like to remind you that the Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list.
        Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble.  The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members.  The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations.
        They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS.  The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves.
        The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer.  They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State.
        Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office.  The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar.
        On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot.  This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers.
        This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state.
        The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people.  After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe."
        The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America.  Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation.
        Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people.  By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.
        We cannot hope to reclaim our Country if we continue to let that beast stay in our bed and in our homes.  It is imperative that we remove this demon from its throne and put OUR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back into effect.  We must stop worrying about what someone else will think, this is our country and we have foreign entities attempting to take control of us and our Nation.
        These children of Satan have nothing good in store for any of us, and those who are ignorant enough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy, deserve just what they receive because they ask for it.
         The small handful that are good must get on the right side and help us win our war, or they are not on our side.  There can be no more sitting on the fence, people must decide which side they are on and fight.
        Lawyers that claim to be on our side and are later found out to be traitors, must be put to death as this is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations.  Americans cannot win the war if they allow traitors to infiltrate our tanks and get away with it.  The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly enemy, that care nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them, you could be their next victim.
        Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed in the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in the INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN (TREASON).
        They have already taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar associations, make a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY.
        This necessitated and URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP)..  All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution, the 13th Amendment and Article I, Section 26 of the Texas Constitution.
XI.    The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government.  Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN.  No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics.  Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only.
        All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens.
        When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.
        In these Unconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) with a lot of hanky panky and hocus pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms.
        The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders.
        ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution."
        Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts.  The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc.
        This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court.  Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).
        The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE.  The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.
         Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over.  Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS.
        When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY."
        Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH.
        These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws.
 Since crime and treason are against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these TRAITORS, the lawyers.
 As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice.  There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS).
        When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY.  He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "No."  The lawyer --judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissable.  This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS.  Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.
        All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court."
        Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government.  Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government.  Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches.  This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.
        District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.  TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRAND JURIES!
        The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now.  That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.
        Imagine hypothetically how stupid it would be if any constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution."
        ORGANIZED CRIME never existed until the BAR ASSOCIATION took over OUR COURTS and OUR GOVERNMENT.  Now crime is organized internationally, just as the Bar Associations are organized.  Some of their international affiliations include but are not limited to THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSOCIATION; INTERNATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; WORLD PEACE THROUGH LAW CENTER; WORLD ASSEMBLY OF JUDGES: et al.  This means that the Bar Associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY.
        ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME.  All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system" of hanky panky and hocus pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE.  ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF "TREASON."
        In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate.   When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.
        An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS.  Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.
        In all elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS, never vote for a lawyer.  Vote FOR NON-LAWYERS ONLY.  If only lawyers are running for election to the same office, do NOT vote for any of them, as most are ALL ALIKE.  All lawyers are programmed to be "TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES."
        Most importantly don't be afraid to use it.  We are under vicious assault and we must make use of every resource we have, or give into their slavery.  COPY AND SPREAD WIDELY, SEND COPIES TO THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES.
 II Corinthians 5:5.  For we walk by faith, not by sight.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Read This Now

Col. Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921]…

“[Very] soon every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology we can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us, will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

Friday, October 15, 2010

The Critique Of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant (review)

 I didn't like math much when I went through high school, but when I learned calculus, I was fascinated. Calculus is a guided, safe and relatively easy journey to the very limits of human reason and understanding. It is almost magical but also completely intuitive after given the requisite amount of consideration. I have always thought of myself as a word smith rather than a real intellectual, but I have to credit the increase in my overall consciousness to Kant for those aforementioned words. James Stewart, the author of my first calculus textbook says that calculus is "the most powerful weapon of thought ever developed by mankind". IMO, "The Critique Of Pure Reason" is as awe inspiring, perhaps almost as "transcendental" as the fundamental theorem of calculus.

I have read a number of books on philosophy, about ten of them are on the Wiki list of the most important books ever written. Some of these books, such as J.S. Mills "On Liberty" are very easy to read and lead the new reader of philosophy to a greater understanding. Others such as Aristotle's "Nicomachean Ethics" are books that once you read them you are left with the feeling that everyone should read them and that they should be taught in high schools.

Leo Strauss' "History and Natural Right" is not on the aforementioned list but is both eloquent and enjoyable, even if you dis-agree with Strauss' thesis, you have to appreciate the flow of the words and the thorough and complete reasoning contained in this book. Having not yet read Hobbs, and being unclear  about the second chapter I still enjoyed this book very much.

I found Aristotle's "The Politic" drier than a glass of sand in the middle of a desert. I had to get into a little self mutilation in the form of biting my lip until it bled or occasionally pinching myself to stay awake and continue reading that mammoth, but it was worth the effort in the end. Its amazing what he knew that applies to what we see today in politics. He offers us conspiracy theorists an arsenal of information regarding the nature of rule by man.

Nietzsche, to me, was very difficult- incomprehensible at times and with no clear thesis. To me it sounded like Nietzsche hung around coffee shops and jotted down what he overheard from others- nothing to see here IMO. Plato's Republic was also much more difficult than Kant's book. I would say The Republic is the most difficult book I have ever read but very well worth the effort. (one can be fooled into thinking Platos' Republic is easy by not really reading into it). I find Kant to be very clear and full of explanation.

Besides calculus, perhaps even slightly more so, in terms of pure value for the mind is Kant's book. During the time I spent reading this book I had thought about blogging on various little bits of it, but then decided that I couldn't quote it directly without leaving a confused reader. I am not smart enough to accurately summarize what this book has to say- it needs all of its pages. Its not about Kantian ethics, but concludes with a reasoned justification for the Kantian view of the world.

I found the book as easy to read and as enjoyable to read as any of the others listed above, with the possible exception of Strauss. Strauss is a great thinker and a great writer, Kant says more but is not so enjoyable to read as Strauss. Kant's book is much deeper than these other ones.

This is a book that questions the very notion of reason as a thought process when applied to cosmological questions. Although it acknowledges that reason is the highest form of thought, in particular "pure reason" which requires no empirical information, it informs us of reason's weakness and how it is so often claimed to be applied by philosophers in what can really only be described as sophism. Kant exposes what I have termed as the "Gods Of Reason".

This book is listed as one of the ten most difficult books to read of all time, right up there with Joyce's "Finnigans Wake",  Hegels "Phenomenology Of Spirit",  Sartre's "Being and Nothingness" and Hiedeggers "Being & Time". These books are books I have always considered to be over my head. Joyces book never interested me but one day I hope to read the others.

This is a heavy read, the full 650 pages are required, but it is written in little sections of 20 or so pages. I found my brain to be overheating a bit if I tried to read more than one section at a sitting. This was due to the ideas of Kant, not so much due to my difficulty in understanding his words. I also found a dictionary of philosophy to be a necessary co-companion to the book because Kant introduces a lot of new terms.

A book like Critique Of Pure Reason requires careful study, a single read through is just a small taste of the big picture of Kant's view. The material is incredibly important and overall addresses the very concept of freewill. Without freewill, any kind of morality is irrelevant. This issue takes the reader on a journey to consider the nature of consciousness and sensory perception, using only reason without experience. This is the very core and root and purpose of philosophy and nothing I have ever read comes close to this in penetrating the real issues that form the foundations of ethics.

I read the Smith Kemp version of The Critique Of Pure Reason, I listened to the newer versions from MP3's on the web which are said to be as good as the Smith Kemp translation in terms of accuracy but my problem with those is that they use more complex words than what the 1923 Smith Kemp version  does.
 It will be a long time before I fully appreciate, and may never completely understand, what is contained in this first of three critiques written by Immanuel Kant.

Finally, the book has no prerequisites, with the possible exception of Hume and Liebniz (note that in calculus the symbology used to give the common man intuitive understanding of this branch of math is termed "Liebniz notation"). Kants thoughts on Hume and Humes beliefs seem to be well explained.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Burning The Koran: Subtle Propaganda

The latest uproar regarding burning the Koran on 9/11 is nothing more than a subtle propaganda technique used to make people forget that 9/11 was an inside job. There can be no doubt about this, given that the total destruction of building 7 (Solomon Brothers Building) was announced on the controlled news networks approximately 20 minutes before it supposedly "succumbed to fires". This prior knowledge proves that 9/11 was an inside job over and above all of the common sense that can be applied to how the buildings collapsed. Common sense tells us that a straight line is the shortest distance between tow points and that a building does not collapse straight down in an organized fashion through its path of greatest resistance.

Those people that require expert confirmation just lack common sense. This is the opinion of many of the experts I have spoken to in person after asking them about this.

More importantly, as we argue about the Koran burning, we temporarily forget that 9/11 was an inside job and that burning the Koran has nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. An injection of truth reminding us of the cause of the building collapses will be inoculation against this technique.

The best book on techniques of propaganda that I have ever heard of is the one by Jacques Ellul called "Propaganda: The Shaping of Men's Attitudes". This technique and its counter technique of truth is well explained in this book. It is a far more exhaustive treatment of the subject than the one by Bernays, which is really only introductory and very basic.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Building What ?

Building What ?

Its unlikely that any investigation of 9/11 will ever take place. The un-accountable BAR association will never allow it into its courts. BAR members will not push for it.

This is the perfect example of what is wrong with our society. Power is unaccountable because the BAR association wants it that way and they have their monopoly on justice.

Its the 800 lb gorilla in all the countries that no one is noticing. Bring justice back, send the BAR members back to England.

If you still don't believe 9/11 was an inside job, search "wtc7 prior knowledge" for proof. Ask yourself why no one will get an independent inquiry before the BAR association courts.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

The Anti-Lawyer Party (ALP)

(re-printed with permission from the ALP)



Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed IN the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people in unconstitutional courts, we, the people, must protect ourselves where we need the most protection, in the courtrooms, FROM the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

The courts are always ruling AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in an INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN (TREASON). They already have taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar
associations, making a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY.

This necessitated an URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI-LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP).

All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Art. IV, Sec. 4, of the U.S. Constitution, "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government," any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public office or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made ONLY themselves 1 st class citizens, where all public offices and all three branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only 2 branches of government and to only certain offices in those 2 branches of government, BECAUSE ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE NON-LAWYERS HAVE BEEN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY DEGRADED, BY THE LAWYERS, TO THE STATUS OF 2ND CLASS CITIZENS.

When the courts belong to the people, as the U. S. Constitution REQUIRES (Art. IV, Sec. 4), we, the people, will NEVER EVER rule against ourselves.

In these unconstitutional courts (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, wearing unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY (Art. 1, Secs. 9 and 16), with a lot of hanky-panky and hocus-pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology where the people are terrorized by terrorists (lawyers and lawyer-judges) in the courts.

The judicial branch of government does NOT have the constitutional power to issue court orders or any other kind of orders.

ONLY presidents and governors have the constitutional power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution. "

Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill outfancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law: that he does not know court rules and procedures: etc. This is unconstitutional (1 st Amend.), as it denies the citizen access to the courts, which are supposed to belong to the people. Instead, all "our" courts are owned by lawyers (traitors) internationally.

In court, lawyers cue the lawyer-judges with certain words and phrases, directing and signaling the type of fix to take place. The most extreme inhuman punishment is inflicted on a victim when a lawyer " signals" the lawyer-judge that the victim has extreme disrespect for the legal profession and the judiciary, or that the victim will not "cooperate.' ' All cases are fixed with these and other cues and signals, which have nothing to do with the law or the U. S. Constitution.

Under this unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers), NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court., anything else is a Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U. S. Constitution (Art. 1, Secs. 9 & 10).

The U. S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer, or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel can be anyone the accused chooses WITHOUT limitation. NEITHER THE %,,)RD LAWYER NOR THE ATTORNEY APPEAR ANYWHERE IN THE U. S. CONSTITUTION.

Lawyers and lawyer-judges created unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial *'Motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigation, which is BARRATRY and is also in violation of the U.S. Constitution, as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. The multitude of pre-trials are actually pre-trials for the pre-trials and pre-trials for the pre-pre-trials, benefiting the lawyers only. These pre-trials and post-trials too, started with the TAKE-OVER of the courts by the INTERNATIONALLY affiliated bar associations, in a CONSPIRACY; before this, defendants only had a trial, NOT TRIALS.

When a criminal is freed on a "TECHNICALITY, " he is freed because of a FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY, NOT BY ANY---TECHNICALITY.

Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL lawyer-judges have to disqualify themselves, as there cannot be a constitutional trial and there also would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because ''Officers of the Court" are on both sides of the BENCH.

These same LAWYER-judges are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ANNUALLY, all in violation of the conflict of interest laws.

Since crime and treason is against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these traitors. the lawyers.

As long as there are lawyers. there will never ever be any law, constitution, or justice, There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS).


When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony, when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "no". The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes. and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcripts FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch Of government, as they have the unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Art. 1, Secs. 9 and 10). "Officer of the Court," Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch. but non-lawyer citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers, as 1 st class citizens. can be hired or elected to any of the 3 branches of government. All lawyers, being "Officers of the Court" in the Judicial Branch, are unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to either the executive or the legislative branches: this is in violation of the separation of powers checks and balances. and the conflict of interest laws.

ALL lawyers are UNDER ORDERS to HELP ONLY CROOKS and' to AC. VICTIMIZE VICTIMS. That is why ONLY CROOKS SHOULD LIKE LAWYERS. who are their counterparts.

The 6th Amendment states, ''the accused shall enjoy the right to a SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL." Yet, lawyer- judges have lawyers (HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES) approach the bench and talk in whispers, meet in the judge's chambers, talk in SECRET, send the jury OUT of the courtroom, etc. Also lawyer-judges order the litigants, witnesses, lawyers, news media, etal.from discussing the trial, making the trial an unconstitutional SECRET TRIAL, NOT A PUBLIC TRIAL.

No one can be sentenced to prison unless convicted of a crime BY A JURY (THE PEOPLE). ONLY the people (THE JURY) have the POWER to decide the guilt or innocence of the accused as Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 3, of the U.S. Constitution states, "THE TRIAL OF ALL CRIMES, except in cases of impeachment, SHALL BE BY JURY." Since this is a CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT, a trial by jury cannot be "waived," as ONLY A JURY, under the U.S. Constitution, HAS THE POWER TO DECIDE THE GUILT OR INNOCENCE OF THE ACCUSED.,

The 6th Amendment REAFFIRMS the CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT OF A TRIAL BY JURY ONLY, "In ALL criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial JURY of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."

In a REPUBLIC, NOTHING is above the 'PEOPLE and the PEOPLE make the decisions. NOT A RULING CLASS. That is why a jury's verdict cannot be reversed by any government official, such as a lawyer-judge or anyone else. If a lawyer-judge or lawyer-judges can reverse a jury's verdict, then, that would place them above the people, making "our" government an ARISTOCRACY and NOT a REPUBLIC. A jury (the PEOPLE) can even veto stupid and unjust legislation, by finding victims of stupid and unjust laws, passed by the lawyers in the legislatures, innocent, even though they pleaded guilty. THE PEOPLE IN A REPUBLIC ARE SOVEREIGN.


NO Due Process of. Law
NO Arrest
NO Rights Read
NO Bail
NO Habeas Corpus
NO Prosecutor

Yet, persons held in CONTEMPT OF COURT, are LYNCHED by a DESPOT. a lawyer-judge, who does:

the Accusing the Prosecuting the Convicting and the Sentencing, ALL WITHOUT A TRIAL - LYNCHING

ALL THIS IS A BILL OF ATTAINDER (Art. 1. Secs. 9 and 10)

Lawyer-judges have been releasing from prison, criminals who have raped and murdered little children because their "rights- were not read to them. But, contempt of court LYNCH VICTIMS, never having had their "rights" read to them, must remain in prison.

The lawyer-judges ORDER law enforcement officers, who also are sworn to support the U. S. Constitution, to imprison contempt of court LYNCH VICTI MS and to be part of a LYNCH MOB. Law enforcement officers should REFUSE to obey these DESPOTIC ILLEGAL ORDERS to imprison contempt of court LYNCH VICTIMS and refuse to be a part of a LYNCH MOB. No one has to obey an illegal order.

Under the UNCONSTITUTIONAL DESPOTIC "LAWYER SYSTEM" we now have, a COURT ORDER could be issued declaring that anyone who violates a law. of any kind. would be in violation of a COURT ORDER and BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT (LYNCHED).

When a victim, in a courtroom, tries to bring out the truth or to exercise a constitutional right. the lawyer-judge will call it an ''OUTBURST" and LYNCH THE VICTIM with contempt of court, then practice medicine without a license by ordering the victim to undergo psychiatric examinations.

The U. S. Constitution being the supreme fundamental law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (unconstitutional amendments). That is why all judges and public officials are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT to interpret it. Imagine, hypothetically, how stupid it would be if any
constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution. "

An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX MONEY is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY THE LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

Organized crime never ever existed, until the bar associations took over the courts and the government. Now crime is organized internationally, just as the bar associations are organized, where some of their international affiliations include: International Judicial Association, International Trial Lawyers Association, World Peace Through Law Center, World Assembly of Judges, etal[. This means that the bar associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY. Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS, ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same unconstitutional "lawyer' system" of hanky-panky and hocus-pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED' STATES FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE. ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF TREASON.

District Attorneys and State's Attorneys have TAKEN OVER the grand juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crime's committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THESE DOCUMENTED ACTS OF TREASON AND OTHER CRIMES, COMMITTED BY THE LAWYERS AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, TO THE GRAND JURIES! An INDICTMENT would call for the ARREST OF ALL LAWYERS, AND LAWYER-JUDGES, INCLUDING THE LAWYER- JUDGES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON AND OTHER CRIMES.

In elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS. Never ever vote for a lawyer. Vote FOR non-lawyers ONLY. If only lawyers are running for election to the same off ice, do NOT vote for any of them, as they are ALL ALIKE. ALL lawyers are programmed to be TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES.




Anti-Lawyer Party
Delaware Chapter
1624 Savannah Rd.
Lewes, DE 19958

Kenosha Co., WI Chap.
6308 - 24th Ave.
Kenosha, WI 53140


Thursday, August 19, 2010

The Gold Standard

The gold standard will not save us. The system espoused by Ron Paul and the rest of the gold bugs will be identical to the system we now have. We still have a natural right because our money is made out of paper. When the money becomes real, we will have no viable natural right defense in the courts- as we do now - or at least the few of us that read do.

Our natural right, the philosophy which the America was created by has dis-appeared, but it still exists in practice because the money is fake. When the money becomes real, our natural right will dis-appear. The philosophy of the forefathers of America will be gone - "ancient history". When America loses her freedoms the restof the countries will follow. Only America carries the torch of natural right.

The Law Merchant is the most important concept that describes our society the way it truly operates and attourneys and money are really the same system. If we switch to a gold standard and keep our attourneys we will be lead into an iron yoke of slavery. The banksters will still lend the country money, they will control any kind of gold mining. All of the gold will be lent into existance.

The attourneys will be empowered to attourn yours and my own wealth over to the banksters just as they do now, but we will be forced to enter the BAR in court cases and be re-presented by attourneys (as slaves to the crown bankers).

What people do not understand and desperately need to understand is that attourneys rule this planet. The same BAR association members are the attourneys, judges and politicians in every "westernized" country. They make the rules, they interpret them. This is precisely why no one will ever get investigated for 9/11, all the wars will continue - because the banksters of the Crown and their attourneys want it that way.

See the posts below regarding attourneys and what they actually do. Learn the difference between an attourney and a lawyer. Above all else, we MUST stop electing attourneys.

Friday, August 13, 2010

One For The Anarchists

We always assume that traffic lights are necessary. The implications of this video are profound and won't be lost on anyone. I'm not an anarchist, but I am further from a socialist.

see YouTube or the embedded video below.

Friday, August 6, 2010

Facts, Values & Stupid Patriots

This short commentary regards the three minute video posted here, it is also posted below.

The speaker of this video asks the congressman a very simple question, which requires a simple factual answer. Can the government do anything it wants ? The congressman answered that this is usually true - the government can do almost anything it wants. The woman cries out as if the congressman was giving a value judgement on her statement regarding the constitution when in fact, the congressman gave an honest answer to a straightforward question.

When Patriots learn to use their critical thinking rather than emotions in thinking about these issues, we will win. Crying about facts only makes us look stupid and it has likely discouraged anyone that may both have a brain and be on our side from joining us.

The fact has been that Americans have been living in a free country, and the government, like Americans has been able to do whatever it wants. It has been up to the American people to accept or reject these offers. Most Americans have been trapped in slavery and cry out for freedom while at the same time not recognizing that freedom requires courage, prudence and wisdom. Those lacking these qualities, particularly wisdom, will be forever enslaved.

Smarter Americans have been learning about the law and cognizing the matrix. Dumber ones are crying and complaining about how corrupt the government is as if the government has owed them something.

The first thing people need to learn is that the government is bankrupt, it being a corporation, must abide by the rules set out by its Ch 11 creditors. Part of doing this involves tricking Americans into believing they they must act as sureties for the debt and therefore must follow these rules. The legal system is adversarial and the government is in mo way obligated to spoon feed the people the facts to show them how they are being conned. These people choose to be lie-able rather than learn about the law.

The constitution is a meaningless document for those who volunteer to be lie-able. Most people choose to be lie-able and therefore the constitution is only a document of historical significance that reflects the freedom Americans used to have when they had wisdom and courage.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Income Tax: Are You Lie-Able ?

Epistomology refers to the study of knowledge and economics is the science of wealth distribution. In this science money is the context in which this is spoken. Is money wealth ? Can it be used logically in the payment of debt ? Is the basis for the study of economics under our present monetary system false ?

In the context of private matters, money represents labour. If you borrow $20.00 from a friend, you are borrowing his/her labour and should pay it back.

Lets think about the income tax for a moment. You get an income tax "bill" in the mail and are expected to send money. In the world of debt slavery and macro-economic analysis of our current government, almost no one laughs out loud except a few, me included, and here is why:

This paper money is not money - its the opposite of money - its debt !!! Any dollar in existence is there because it was borrowed at some point - it was born when it was borrowed. Technically it was birthed into merchant/admiralty law.

If I borrow your car and smash it up then borrow someone elses car, can you ask me for that someone elses car to replace yours ? No way, BUT I could voluntarily give it to you and deal with that someone else later (this is what actually creates our balloning "debt"). So how can you be forced to pay a "tax" with "money" that is already spoken for ? (ie previously borrowed to even exist)

You cannot be forced to pay a debt with a debt and only people that are lie-able and agree to have elected representatives re-present them as slaves to the Crown banks are required to pay income "tax" (its not a tax really- its a "return"). The income tax does not pay for roads and hospitals - it pays for the interest on the debt, the debt that really doesn't actually exist in the first place- the money doesn't represent any value until someone agrees to work for it, but that is not the idea behind this argument.

In the case of government employees, the money was borrowed to pay their salaries, therefore they may be forced to pay it back. Government employees are required to pay income tax by law.

If you work for a private company, the money paying your salary was borrowed elsewhere and therefore is already spoken for. It may have been borrowed by paying customers to buy the product your company sells, borrowed by stockholders to buy your company's stock or have been borrowed from a bank by the company's owners to pay you, or from another source. No one therefore has the right to demand that you use this "money" as payment for another debt.

Voluntary slavery is legal and we have a system for it that people call the "legal system". Its a system and its legal (because we agree to operate under its terms) but they cannot force you into it, they trick and intimidate you into volunteering by getting you to be re-presented from a "unfeathered wide nailed biped with the faculty of reason" to being a "person" (read corporation) in their courts and under their legal system (the system that happens to be legal) and thus lie-able and to therefore operate as if the debt money was wealth (the lie).

The trick is not to be lie-able and not let the attorneys re-present you to the banks (courts= bench = bank) whether they are in government or in a court of (merchant) law.

A trust has been created in your name to accept these liabilities and protect the PTB from being accused of forced slavery. Its evidenced by the birth certificate, which they have and you have a certified copy to prove that they hold the corporation (person) papers and are thus liable for the debt.

Its all a great big bad joke. It exists so our real wealth can be attorned to the Crown banks.

Keep in mind that an Act of congress or parliament is just that - an ACT. Its not real unless you are in the play. In the play you are a slave. There is a bill associated with the Act and the bill must be paid if you are lie-able. Breaking the rules in this system that is legal (due to your acquiescence) leads to charges (demands for "money"). Non payment of charges puts you in debtors prison. All prisoners are in debtor prisons.

Its a house of smoke and mirrors, not forced slavery. It works because our legal system is adversarial. The other side doesn't have to tell you that you are being tricked.

A discussion of macro-economics in the context of "money" is empty. There is no logical possible obligation and the money in no way represents wealth and thus cannot be used to pay debts. Not only is payment of a debt by creating another debt un-enforcable, but the very money lent has no intrinsic value and therefore the only thing that gives it value is the willingness to work for it.

The payment of taxes is required for government to operate and any group of people that decide to live together must live by rules and a government is necessary to enforce these rules. But the payment of what we refer to as income "tax" is not really a tax at all because it doesn't pay government expenses.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Sunday, July 18, 2010

The Greatest Threat

Introduction To The Treasonous International Bar Association

By Harsha Sankar
February 26, 2005

March 2003

All Americans need to be introduced to the Treasonous International Bar Association. In its role as a dual membership organisation, comprising 16,000 individual lawyers and 180 Bar Associations and Law Societies, the International Bar Association (IBA) influences the development of international law reform and shapes the future of the legal profession. Its Member Organisations cover all continents and include the American Bar Association, the German Federal Bar, the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, the Law Society of Zimbabwe and the Mexican Bar Association.

The IBA, based in London, states it works to promote, protect and enforce human rights under a just rule of law, and to preserve the independence of the judiciary and the legal profession worldwide. If one believes this, then he or she must also believe in non-democratic governance. If the law is left to any special elitist groups, then imperialism will result no matter how noble their stated intentions may be.

Americans currently live in a faceless, nameless, and decentralized bar associations kingship. Their dictatorship has derailed the rule of law and has rendered the People helpless. They have been lawyered to abject submission by this subtle yet sinister totalitarianism. Moreover, these unaccountable associations which desire to internationalize their aristocratic clutches are affiliated with the unelected International Bar Association. The IBA obviously does not need to respect The Bill Of Rights.

The IBA is the foulest form of the New World Order. Concerns about the Iluminati, the Bilderbergs, and The Council Of 300 need to be momentarily cast aside. This Association is actively seeking conquest of the entire world's legal system like thieves in the night and priests during the day. All three government branches and all its personnel must serve the People only. One cannot have two masters. One cannot cannot have a spouse and a whore and expect to receive credit as a good spouse. All Americans pledge their allegiance solely to this nation and its republic under God.

These conflicting loyalties of lawyers is the gravest threat yet to the liberty and security of all citizens. This collaboration is treacherous, traitorous, and wholly destructive of representative self-rule. This complicitity is still another a despicable crime, taken to the next level, against the Constitution and the People. The voices and genuine rights of the individual are one the verge of being drowned by this nexus. The three branches of government will soon no longer need the consent of Americans to operate. Please review for more information.

Bar is an acronym for British Accredited Registry or British Accredited Regency. A young M. Gandhi, an Indian subject of the British Empire, passed the Bar Exam in 1893 to become a Bar attorney and member. So a question that has to be asked is why American legal professionals belong to an organization with a foreign name. Another question which requires an answer is why lawyers are called esquires despite the Constitutional ban on Titles Of Nobility.

All laws should no longer be written exclusively by attorneys in "legalese".They should be written by non-judicial advocates in plain English.Also judges and prosecutors should be banned from belonging to organizations comprising only of judicial advocates due to obvious conflict of interest.

Hiding Behind the BAR: Why Attorneys are not Lawyers

Author Unknown
Posted March 13, 2005

Forward courtesy of Dr. Kanya <>

In the U.S., they're collectively called everything from "attorney" to "lawyer" to "counselor." Are these terms truly equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken for another? What exactly is a "Licensed BAR Attorney?" This credential accompanies every legal paper produced by attorneys - along with a State Bar License number. As we are about to show you, an ‘attorney’ is not a ‘lawyer,’ yet the average American improperly interchanges these words as if they represent the same occupation, and the average American attorney unduly accepts the honor to be called "lawyer" when he is not.

In order to discern the difference, and where we stand within the current court system, it’s necessary to examine the British origins of our U.S. courts and the terminology that has been established from the beginning. It's important to understand the proper lawful definitions for the various titles we now give these court related occupations.

The legal profession in the U.S. is directly derived from the British system. Even the word "bar" is of British origin:

BAR. A particular portion of a court room. Named from the space enclosed by two bars or rails: one of which separated the judge's bench from the rest of the room; the other shut off both the bench and the area for lawyers engaged in trials from the space allotted to suitors, witnesses, and others. Such persons as appeared as speakers (advocates, or counsel) before the court, were said to be "called to the bar", that is, privileged so to appear, speak and otherwise serve in the presence of the judges as "barristers." The corresponding phrase in the United States is "admitted to the bar". - A Dictionary of Law (1893).

From the definition of ‘bar,’ the title and occupation of a "barrister" is derived:

BARRISTER, English law.

1.A counselor admitted to plead at the bar.

2. Ouster barrister, is one who pleads ouster or without the bar.

3. Inner barrister, a sergeant or king's counsel who pleads within the bar.

4. Vacation barrister, a counselor newly called to the bar, who is to attend for several long vacations the exercise of the house.

5. Barristers are called apprentices, apprentitii ad legem, being looked upon as learners, and not qualified until they obtain the degree of sergeant. Edmund Plowden, the author of the Commentaries, a volume of elaborate reports in the reigns of Edward VI., Mary, Philip and Mary, and Elizabeth, describes himself as an apprentice of the common law. - A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier (Revised Sixth Edition, 1856).

BARRISTER, n. [from bar.] A counselor, learned in the laws, qualified and admitted to please at the bar, and to take upon him the defense of clients; answering to the advocate or licentiate of other countries. Anciently, barristers were called, in England, apprentices of the law. Outer barristers are pleaders without the bar, to distinguish the from inner barristers, benchers or readers, who have been sometime admitted to please within the bar, as the
king's counsel are. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

Overall, a barrister is one who has the privilege to plead at the courtroom bar separating the judicial from the non-judicial spectators. Currently, in U.S. courts, the inner bar between the bench (judge) and the outer bar no longer exists, and the outer bar separates the attorneys (not lawyers) from the spectator's gallery. This will be explained more as you read further. As with the word ‘bar,’ each commonly used word describing the various court officers is derived directly from root words:

1). From the word "solicit" is derived the name and occupation of a ‘solicitor’; one who solicits or petitions an action in a court.

SOLICIT, v.t. [Latin solicito]

1. To ask with some degree of earnestness; to make petition to; to apply to for obtaining something. This word implies earnestness in seeking ...

2. To ask for with some degree of earnestness; to seek by petition; as, to solicit an office; to solicit a favor. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

2). From the word "attorn" is derived the name and occupation of an ‘attorney;’ one who transfers or assigns property, rights, title and allegiance to the owner of the land.

ATTORN / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.]

1. v.t. Turn; change, transform; deck out.

2. v.t Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign.

3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal acknowledgement of tenancy ( to a new landlord). - Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

ATTORN, v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ATTORNMENT, n. The act of a feudatory, vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ATTORNMENT n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another; formal acknowledgement of such transfer: lme. - Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

3). From the word advocate comes the meaning of the occupation by the same name; one who pleads or defends by argument in a court.

ADVOCATE, v.t. [Latin advocatus, from advoco, to call for, to plead for; of ad and voco, to call. See Vocal.]
To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal; to support or vindicate. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

4). From the word "counsel" is derived the name and occupation of a ‘counselor’ or ‘lawyer’; one who is learned in the law to give advice in a court of law;

COUNSEL, v.t. [Latin. to consult; to ask, to assail.] 1. To give advice or deliberate opinion to another for the government of his conduct; to advise. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

LAWYER. A counselor; one learned in the law. - A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier (Revised Sixth Edition, 1856).

Although modern usage tends to group all these descriptive occupational words as the same, the fact is that they have different and distinctive meanings when used within the context of court activities:

Solicitor - one who petitions (initiates) for another in a court

Counselor - one who advises another concerning a court matter

Lawyer - [see counselor] learned in the law to advise in a court

Barrister - one who is privileged to plead at the bar

Advocate - one who pleads within the bar for a defendant

Attorney - one who transfers or assigns, within the bar, another's rights & property acting on behalf of the ruling crown (government)

It's very clear that an attorney is not a lawyer. The lawyer is a learned counselor who advises. The ruling government appoints an attorney as one who transfers a tenant's rights, allegiance, and title to the land owner (government).

Feudal Tenancy

If you think you are a landowner in America, take a close look at the warranty deed or fee title to your land. You will almost always find the words "tenant" or "tenancy." The title or deed document establishing your right as a tenant, not that of a landowner, has been prepared for transfer by a licensed BAR Attorney, just as it was carried out within the original English feudal system we presumed we had escaped from in 1776.

A human being is the tenant to a feudal superior. A feudal tenant is a legal person who pays rent or services of some sort for the use and occupation of another's land. The land has been conveyed to the tenant's use, but the actual ownership remains with the superior. If a common person does not own what he thought was his land (he's legally defined as a "feudal tenant," not the superior owner), then a superior person owns the land and the feudal tenant - person pays him to occupy the land.

This is the hidden Feudal Law in America. When a person (a.k.a. human being, corporation, natural person, partnership, association, organization, etc.) pays taxes to the tax assessor of the civil county or city government (also a person), it is a payment to the superior land owner for the right to be a tenant and to occupy the land belonging to the superior. If this were not so, then how could a local government sell the house and land of a person for not rendering his services (taxes)?

We used to think that there was no possible way feudal law could be exercised in America, but the facts have proven otherwise. It's no wonder they hid the definition of a human being behind the definition of a man. The next time you enter into an agreement or contract with another person (legal entity), look for the keywords person, individual, and natural person describing who you are.

Are you the entity the other person claims you are? When you "appear" before their jurisdiction and courts, you have agreed that you are a legal person unless you show them otherwise. You will have to deny that you are the person and state who you really are. Is the flesh and blood standing there in that courtroom a person by their legal definition?

British Accredited Registry (BAR)?

During the middle 1600's, the Crown of England established a formal registry in London where barristers were ordered by the Crown to be accredited. The establishment of this first International Bar Association allowed barrister-lawyers from all nations to be formally recognized and accredited by the only recognized accreditation society. From this, the acronym BAR was established denoting (informally) the British Accredited Registry, whose members became a powerful and integral force within the International Bar Association (IBA). Although this has been denied repeatedly as to its existence, the acronym BAR stood for the British barrister-lawyers who were members of the larger IBA.

When America was still a chartered group of British colonies under patent - established in what was formally named the British Crown territory of New England - the first British Accredited Registry (BAR) was established in Boston during 1761 to attempt to allow only accredited barrister-lawyers access to the British courts of New England. This was the first attempt to control who could represent defendants in the court at or within the bar in America.

Today, each corporate STATE in America has it's own BAR Association, i.e. The Florida Bar or the California Bar, that licenses government officer attorneys, NOT lawyers. In reality, the U.S. courts only allow their officer attorneys to freely enter within the bar while prohibiting those learned of the law - lawyers - to do so. They prevent advocates, lawyers, counselors, barristers and solicitors from entering through the outer bar. Only licensed BAR Attorneys are permitted to freely enter within the bar separating the people from the bench because all BAR Attorneys are officers of the court itself. Does that tell you anything?

Here's where the whole word game gets really tricky. In each State, every licensed BAR Attorney calls himself an Attorney at Law. Look at the definitions above and see for yourself that an Attorney at Law is nothing more than an attorney - one who transfers allegiance and property to the ruling land owner.

Another name game they use is "of counsel," which means absolutely nothing more than an offer of advice. Surely, the mechanic down the street can do that! Advice is one thing; lawful representation is another.

A BAR licensed Attorney is not an advocate, so how can he do anything other than what his real purpose is? He can't plead on your behalf because that would be a conflict of interest. He can't represent the crown (ruling government) as an official officer at the same time he is allegedly representing a defendant. His sworn duty as a BAR Attorney is to transfer your ownership, rights, titles, and allegiance to the land owner. When you hire a BAR Attorney to represent you in their courts, you have hired an officer of that court whose sole purpose and occupation is to transfer what you have to the creator and authority of that court. A more appropriate phrase would be legal plunder.

The official duties of an Esquire

Let's not forget that all U.S. BAR Attorneys have entitled themselves, as a direct result of their official BAR license and oaths, with the British title of "esquire." This word is a derivative of the British word "squire."

SQUIRE, n. [a popular contraction of esquire] 1. In Great Britain, the title of a gentleman next in rank to a knight. 2. In Great Britain, an attendant on a noble warrior. 3. An attendant at court. 4. In the United States, the title of magistrates and lawyers. In New-England, it is particularly given to justices of the peace and judges. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESQUIRE n. Earlier as squire n.1 lme. [Origin French. esquier (mod. écuyer) f. Latin scutarius shield - bearer, f. scutum shield: see - ary 1.] 1. Orig. (now Hist.), a young nobleman who, in training for knighthood, acted as shield-bearer and attendant to a knight. Later, a man belonging to the higher order of English gentry, ranking next below a knight. lme. b Hist. Any of various officers in the service of a king or nobleman. c A landed proprietor, a country squire. arch. - Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

During the English feudal laws of land ownership and tenancy, a squire - esquire - was established as the land proprietor charged with the duty of carrying out, among various other duties, the act of attornment [see definition above] for the land owner and nobleman he served. Could this be any simpler for the average American to understand? If our current U.S. BAR Attorneys were just lawyers, solicitors, barristers, advocates or counselors, then they would call themselves the same. They have named themselves just exactly what they are, yet we blindly cannot see the writing on the wall.

The BAR Attorneys have not hidden this from anyone. That's why they deliberately call themselves "Esquires" and "Attorneys at law." It is the American people who have hidden their own heads in the sand.

Knowing these simple truths, why would anyone consider the services of BAR Attorney-Esquire as his representative within the ruling courts of America? Their purposes, position, occupation, job, and duty is to transfer your allegiance, property, and rights to the landowner, a.k.a. STATE.

They are sworn oath officers of the State whose sole authority is to transfer your property to their landowner-employer. Think about this the next time you enter their courtrooms. From now on, all Americans should refuse to enter past the outer bar when they are called. Who would voluntarily want to relinquish all he has by passing into their legal trap that exists inside that outer bar?

We must all refuse to recognize their royal position as Squires and refuse to hire them as our representatives and agents. They can't plead or argue for you anyway; all they can do is oversee the act of attornment on behalf of the ruling government whom they serve as official officers. Nothing stops your neighbor from being a barrister or lawyer. No real law prohibits any of us from being lawyers! Even Abraham Lincoln was a well-recognized lawyer, yet he had no formal law degree. Let the BAR Attorneys continue in their jobs as property transfer agent-officers for the State, but if no defendant hires them, they'll have to get new jobs or they'll starve. Fire your BAR Attorney and represent yourself as your own lawyer, or hire any non-BAR-licensed lawyer to assist you from outside the courtroom bar.

Refuse to acknowledge all judges who are also licensed BAR Attorneys. Every judge in Florida State is a member of the Florida BAR. This is unlawful and unconstitutional as a judge cannot be an Esquire nor can he represent any issue in commerce, such as that of the State. Every Florida State judge has compromised his purported neutral and impartial judicial position by being a State Officer through his BAR licensure. This is an unlawful monopoly of power and commerce.

The Unauthorized Practice of Law

Fire your BAR Attorney. Refuse to acknowledge their corrupt inner-bar courts of thievery. Formally charge them with the illegal act of practicing law without lawful authority. Why? A BAR Attorney is not a lawyer by lawful definition. An Esquire is an officer of the State with the duty to carry out State activities, including "attornment."

State officers have no constitutional authority to practice law as lawyers, barristers, advocates, or solicitors. Americans should begin formally charging these false lawyers with unlawfully practicing the profession of law since their BAR licenses only give them the privilege to be Attorneys and Squires over land transfers.


About Me

My photo
Author of "Power Outage", available on Smashwords. I am a 50 year old free market libertarian who has had the time to read and consider the nature of globalism and the big machine that is surrounding us. I have participated in politics by running at the Fed level and debated Agenda 21 and 9-11 truth in front of large audiences. My background is in engineering and software creation. My business has provided me with significant time and freedom to learn the truth about the world around us. My goal is to expose Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development and Cultural Marxism.