Thursday, October 17, 2013

Karen Hudes Speaks

Karen Hudes, a senior attorney from the world bank has become a whistle-blower. I've been thinking that these attorneys are nothing more than dupes for the powers that be for a long time. Hudes and a few others are the exceptions to the rule.

Here are some of the things she says:

(1) Your tax money goes to the City Of London then the Vatican. The Jesuits are robbing the people of all their wealth.

I've heard this before and it makes sense but this ideas never formed part of my world view because I have no means of checking or verifying them. I've never heard something like this coming from the mouth of such a highly esteemed ex member of the establishment. Paul Craig Roberts (the colonel or the economist) don't say this but both are highly critical of the establishment.

Agenda 2, better known as sustainable development is the means of the robbery.

She knows this because she followed the money, not from reading conspiracy theory web sites.

(2) They have tried to bribe her but she will not be a dupe.

There is no honor among thieves.

(3) She believes the world will return to the rule of law before everything falls apart. 

 She says she has many people on her side. She says that we need to watch and learn the facts - us little people have to be involved, both watching and learning.

Of course we have to be involved. If we wish to preserve a free society we must be involved and this has been true for all time. Aristotle explains that any civilization has an oligarchy on the top. The political body serves both the people and the oligarchy. This is the basis of the philosophy of Legalism, first applied in ancient China and before the Confusionists threw them out. People need to be involved to preserve their rights.

The reason why the powers that be are robbing us and destroying our conception of society is reasoned out and explained in Plato's Republic. The members of the oligarchy have a different conception of justice than commoners and to create the just society ordinary people must have their knowledge limited and be focused on their task in society and be prevented from thinking outside their box. Everyone over the age of ten years old must be killed off so that the new just society can be built upon the beliefs of the people. These beliefs are carefully shaped by education.

(4) Secret Societies will be eliminated.

This is a well known part of the plan. Exactly how does this get accomplished - certainly not by tearing down Masonic and Rosa Crucian meeting halls and buildings. It can only be accomplished by tearing down the members of the secret societies themselves. Masons and the like would do well to research things like the Georgia Guidestones. I don't recall where I read that secret societies will be eliminated but it seems necessary for a rule of law to apply.

There is a huge awakening happening, a woman that was a stenographer at the White House stood up and said that the congress is just a bunch of devil worshipping free masons. Not far from the truth - most belong to the highly secretive and exclusive BAR association.

She has many interviews on You-Tube and they can be found with a simple search of her name.

Friday, May 31, 2013

The Legal System and The Law

See This isn't the law, its the legal system. It is the fundamental definition of administrative tyranny. The laws are something everyone knows. Kant calls it a-priori knowledge. We know the laws, they are in our hearts like we know the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. This is our reality.

Laws form the basis for all religions and religion is about our law-maker, whatever we conjecture this as. It certainly isn't a gang of hoodlums sitting on capital hill. These people are just punks, and if they are anything like our parliamentarians, you wouldn't want them as neighbors. Good people are just too comfortable or too gutless to speak out about it.

The legal system is for the unwise. They do not know that the legal system presupposes that any of its victims are debtors. A maxim in law is that a debtor has no rights. Think about this.

Our so-called debt isn't real either. Its monopoly money and nothing more and in every sense of the word monopoly. It is backed by neither substance nor promise from its creators. We work for it, we promise to work for it and that is its only value.

Its our money and we don't owe a thing. And us citizens of this North American Union should not be subject to such an abuse as this legal system really is because we owe these bankers and attorneys nothing.

Friday, April 5, 2013

The Science Delusion

The powers that be have a serious interest in generating faith in science - that is that science does or will ultimately determine the nature of reality.

Science explains observations using the lowest standards of proof that are possible. If these standards of proof were used in honest courts of law (we don't actually have these but if we did) then you could be arrested and convicted for murder based on circumstantial evidence. That circumstantial evidence could be a small motive and no one else having a known motive. You were just in the wrong place at the wrong time and someone has to be responsible.

The scientific method is just the creation of a theory that no one can disprove. This is why physics is constantly changing its view of the atom.

A link to a banned TED talk discusses this and some other aspects of science not mentioned here in 18 minutes:

The belief that science will or has already explained the ultimate reality is the true meaning of materialism. A good, but very very difficult book on this topic is Kants "Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science". Kant shows that we must consider material as constructed of atoms to apply science to it. The idea of the atom has been around thousands of years. The description of the atom changes every month when a new magazine on physics gets printed.

A good example of how science can be wrong and how this error can be ignored is known as the Two Capacitor Problem. It consists of the following - charge an ideal capacitor to a known charge then connect another ideal capacitor to it. How does the energy or charge compare before and after the new ideal capacitor is connected ? Use the equations Q=CV and E=(CV^2)/2, C=capacitance in Farads, V = Voltage, Q= charge in coulombs. Either charge or energy must remain constant but not both as must be by our scientific "laws". This shows that Maxwells equations do not describe actual reality. Its a old and well known problem but our computers and telephones still work so no one really talks about this.

Science is great if you want to make a better cup of coffee, a better computer or telephone, but its useless in determining ultimate reality. Thats OK because science still allows magnification and concentrations of power and of course comfort.

Materialism turns scientists into gods and the "powers that be" control science. Its all part of a society based on authority rather than reason, ethical relativism rather than a true ethic, a legal system rather than the law. Materialism is just a vehicle for power concentration and the separation of most of us from the idea of reason itself.

No wonder the talk was banned.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Hypothecation - You Own Nothing - The Government Owns Everything - The United States Of America Is A Bankrupt Entity

by Zane Wright

As originally posted on: Thoughts and Stuff
July 8, 2011

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the most vile, wicked and corrupt systems ever thrust upon the American People.

Hypothecation, remember that word. In essence it means that you and everything you own is collateral for the Federal debt.

HYPOTHECATION, civil law. This term is used principally in the civil law; it is defined to be a right which a creditor has over a thing belonging to another, and which consists in the power to cause it to be sold, in order to be paid his claim out of the proceeds.
From the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993: Vol. 33, page H-1303

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government was dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only. The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund.

Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States?' Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be "money" in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or "currency." Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not "money." A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not "money"

The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, -gold and silver coin. It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any "money." Most Americans have not been paid any "money" for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand

why you are "bankrupt," along with the rest of the country? Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account.

FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). When ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs. Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.

There is a fundamental difference between "paying" and "discharging" a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of "good and valuable consideration." Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.

Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations. The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3] The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government.

The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same. Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter.

The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle. Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed.

Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

The long and the short of it is; you cannot discharge a debt with another debt. The federal reserve note is a debt instrument bearing the signatures of both the debtor and the creditor. When you purchase something with a federal reserve note the item which you purchased remains hypothecated as collateral in the national debt.

You own nothing. The Government owns everything.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Latest Terrorist Threat 1/23/2013

The latest gun threat occured at Mount Carmel school where a five year old girl threatened classmates with a Hello Kitty bubble gun, pictured below. Could this young girl be the next Usama bin Laden ? Could the toy manufacterer Hello Kitty be the next Al-CIA -duh ?

I started to realize that a lot of the people that work for this system are actually nuts more than ten years ago. This particular incident, the way that it occurred and has been reported proves this more than the incident itself - if it did happen the way it was reported.

In a sane world the school Superintendent Bernard Stellar of Mount Carmel school would have been given a straight jacket and taken to the nearest puzzle factory for close evaluation and testing, but in the world in which we live, the five year old girl with the Hello Kittle bubble gun was suspended for ten days. The suspension was later reduced to two days.[1]

Her mom and dad want her at a different school but they cannot get her in due to this on her record, even though her psychological evaluation showed her to be functioning within normal parameters 8-). This shows that Mr. Stellar is not the only one that is nuts.

The little girl was interrogated by the superintendent for three hours. Could she have been tortured if she had told the superintendent what any one of us would have said to him ?
Is the superintendent trying to make a point or is he actually nuts? My guess is that he is actually nuts, certainly the other schools in the area that will not accept this little girl are as crazy as Mr. Stellar seems to be.

Maybe the school administrators just need more parameters from which to operate. Maybe sane people that base judgment on reason should be running the schools.

Another school was shut down for hours over a nerf gun [2]


[2] ibid

Thursday, January 17, 2013

The Gun Control Debate

Similar to the Global Warming debate, the gun control debate is virtually non-existent in mainstream. Global warming is well known to be a fraud and its easy to see why invitations to debate were consistently rejected by the pro global warming side. Global warming could have easily been exposed as a fraud if free fair debate was permitted. The New York Times has recently closed its environmental desk. ( see ) No one is buying that anymore.

The Sandy Hook shooting has brought the gun control issue to light, and the liberal/democrat side has been using emotion and the importance of the problem to espouse its side while carefully side-stepping any reasoned debate.

The following short debate between Larry Pratt and that neo-liberal sack of shit, Piers Morgan illustrates how the liberal side tries to control the debate and keep it emotional while the more reasoned Pratt tries to tries to expose his reasoning.

A similar debate occured between Alex Jones and Piers Morgan, but Jones became overly emotional and was unable to espouse fact on air but was able to tell the listeners that there are studies available that show gun control does not reduce violent crime. In fact, violent crime always rises when gun control is implemented, this is consistent. Jones had the rightful indignation that many reasoned people are beginning to feel. Jones was not attempting to cover up fact. He was primarily trying to expose the FBI statistics.

The gun control debate is always framed buy gun control advocates as being strictly about violence by gun shot. It may very well be that gun use in crimes decreases, but violence itself increases. Gentle reader, would you rather be beaten to death, stabbed or shot ? Or would you rather be in equal footing with your would-be-assailant and have your equal footing act as an effective deterrent ?

Studies by the FBI and National Academy of Science show us the argument in favor of gun control is based on bad information assumed to be true by those that are mis-informed, lead by emotion, or lead by authority rather than reason.[1],[2]

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjected peoples to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing.”
Adolph Hitler, Edict of March 18, 1938 (source - )

“What we need to do is change the way in which people think about guns, especially young people….We have to be repetitive about this….We need to do this every day of the week, and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”
Attorney General Eric Holder (source - ibid)

[1] Gun sales have been on the rise, these FBI statistics show a decrease in violent crime:

[2] National Academy of Sciences panel on firearms and violence has reported its findings: (you have to read this carefully) . Also see (a-priori means "independent of experience and necessarily true" eg: a straight line is the shortest distance between two points)

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Emile Parker (Sandy Hook victim) Sitting on Barry Soetoro's Lap


The strangeness of Sandy Hook is very well covered on Global Research.

This whole thing is much stranger than 9/11.
 Sandy Hook & The War On Reason

This past weekend I was sitting at my local Starbucks/Chapters reading while a group of three high school teachers chatted beside my table, close enough and loud enough so as their voices could be heard over the pink noise I play on my MP3 player to block out noise when reading at cafes.

I took my earphones off and I explained to them that I could hear from their conversation that they were school teachers. I told them that this Sandy Hook incident had been bothering me and that I wanted to know what they thought of it.

They said didn't know what to think of the situation, their attitude was that no one can really know what happened, so why bother thinking about it ? I responded along the lines of the following.

The Columbine shooting is something that can be thought of as plausible. Its possible that a couple of kids, after being bullied and excluded from normal social activities may become angry enough to want to kill their classmates and school teachers. Its unlikely but at least it's plausible. Other mass shootings can be explained (although weakly) along these lines.

Sandy Hook is different than the others. No one can reasonably think that the confused and mentally deranged shooter could view a group of six year olds as the source of his problems or as a threat to his well-being.

Pedophiles do what they do as a (twisted) act of love. What pedophiles do is not based on hatred or anger. There are abusive parents, but what they do is out of frustration or an inability to cope with the world. Some are psychopaths, some have a pathological hatred towards their own. Their children are not strangers, nor perhaps innocent in their eyes. Serial killers carefully plan their activities and activities both increase and are spread over time.

Where is the motive for an adult to shoot a bunch of perfectly innocent six year old children in cold blood ? A perpetrator needs anger to be directed at his/her target. Who could be angry at classroom full of six year olds that they were not taking responsibility for in any way? Baby sitters, parents  or school teachers may get frustrated and angry, but not strangers.

There is only one group of people that would murder a group of innocent children in cold blood, and they do it with drones regularly. They do it slowly and covertly with aspartame, fluoride and vaccinations. Communist governments are the only group of people that are capable of this kind of atrocity. No one needs to be reminded of Hitler, Stalin, etc. Democide is the number one un-natural killer[2], exceeding early deaths due to tobacco and car accidents by a very wide margin. Of course tobacco and car accidents kill a far greater number of people than killers using guns.

Only the well armed liberal/democrat gun grabbers have been the ones that benefit from this atrocity. They benefit by the change of public opinion that is now in favor of their encroachment upon the rights of ordinary citizens to protect themselves with gun control acts and statutes as mandated by the heavily armed communist financial oligarchy serving United Nations[1].

Communist countries have always disarmed their citizens prior to mass cullings. Its more efficient to kill than to re-educate when so many people are not required to serve elite interests. Disarming US citizens will lead to psychological defeat - all that is needed for strategic defeat. A massively expanded overt police state is being created[3].

The perpetrator of a crime must always have a means, motive (guilty mind) and opportunity.

The motive could be to implement the mandated communist UN gun control agenda[4].  Gun control requires a favorable public opinion. The USA still operates by public opinion - or lack of any opinion (complete acquiescence to power). If this wasn't true then empty neoliberal slogans would have been un-necessary. A group of innocent children being murdered turns simple minds against guns in the same way that slogans such as "Support Our Troops" and "Yes We Can" make people favor war and a larger welfare state.

Anyone that has seen a Mike Mandell or other hypnotist show knows the means for this crime is obvious. The CIA/NSA/FBI/DHS  control grid has a lot more time, resources and knowledge to hypnotize someone than a Saturday Night stage show hypnotist working with people he has never even met in front of a large audience. The control grid has laboratories, professionals, years, and lots of possible subjects from which to choose as hypnosis subjects. A Saturday Night stage show hypnotist can make subjects quack like a duck on stage fifteen minutes after meeting them. Its hard to imagine anything the military industrial complex could not accomplish with hypnosis.

Any group of unarmed people is an opportunity for a mass killer. A group of armed people does not create an opportunity. A possible mass shooting was recently prevented by an armed citizen[5]. Statistics consistently show that more guns means fewer victims. FBI statistics reflect this view[6]. The National Academy Of Science also did a statistical study that reflects this view[7]. Had these teachers been packing heat none of this would have happened. Thieves and murderers victimize those who cannot defend themselves. Who would break into a house with occupants accompanied by Smith & Wesson ? What is the real reason for the gun control agenda ?[8] Clearly it isn't to protect law abiding honest citizens.

People hear this official nonsense about an adult murdering six year olds on TV and they believe it, but at the same time they must realize that the story isn't really believable. People are learning to believe the unbelievable and shut reason off[9]. The war on reason leads to acquiescence to authority. We can be ruled by authority or by reason. Thought in total opposition to common sense is a direct assault on reason. No thought at all is a complete acquiescence to authority.

The teachers left afterward, one said that it was a pleasure meeting me. These striking school teachers probably have a lot of time to talk with each other and who knows what may come out of this conversation I had, or any of the other hundreds I have had with other individuals. Maybe I planted the seeds of an eventual orchard that could save us today, maybe I will another day, maybe someone else will. I think that its important to keep talking about this and other events that have explanations given by the networks that do not fall within the bounds set by reason or common sense.

Conversation lets us practice our reasoning skills. Kant (the most often quoted enlightenment philosopher) explains that without the use of reason in conversations and in free speech, we will lose it in his essay entitled "What Is Orientation In Thinking ?". He explains the importance of having the courage to use ones own reason in his essay called "What Is Enlightenment ?". John Stuart Mills, another brilliant philosopher of the enlightenment period explains the importance of free speech for preserving liberty in a book that a twelve year old could read called "What Is Liberty?". ("What Is Enlightenment ?" is an easy read by Kantian standards)

More than anything, Sandy Hook is a perfect example of a shot fired in the name of the war on reason, if it actually happened or not[10]. One could argue that it would be more efficient to fake it than to do it such as with the terrorists on the planes on 9/11[11].

[1] See John Perkin's "Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man", G. Edward Griffin's "The Fearful Master: A Second Look at The UN". Oligarchies control democratic civilizations to the extent that they can, democracy is the last stage before despotism - See Aristotle's "The Politic".

[2] "20th Century Democide" Statistics published by the University of Hawaii,


[4] Reuters, , ,


[6] Gun sales have been on the rise, these FBI statistics show a decrease in violent crime:

[7] National Academy of Sciences panel on firearms and violence has reported its findings: (you have to read this carefully) . Also see (a-priori means "independent of experience and necessarily true" eg: a straight line is the shortest distance between two points)

[8] Max Weber, see , 

[9] USA War Department now called Department Of National Defense while it wages aggressive wars all over the world, "Yes We Can", "Support Our Troops", Global Warming, Overpopulation (get an airplane ride and a window seat), Water Shortage (the planet is almost completely covered in water), Acts and Statutes believed to be laws. See also "Why We fight" a propaganda film for ww2 (free online) to see how ideas have changed wrt natural rights and the constitution. If the USA and others are so concerned about the well being of citizens why are they involved in the trafficking of heroin (real motive for war in Afghanistan)?

[10] See and many other related questions on the links at the end of this video.

[11] , , , See also Pilots For 9/11 Truth on impossibility of poorly experienced pilot steering plane with degree of skill required for 9/11.


About Me

My photo
Author of "Power Outage", available on Smashwords. I am a 50 year old free market libertarian who has had the time to read and consider the nature of globalism and the big machine that is surrounding us. I have participated in politics by running at the Fed level and debated Agenda 21 and 9-11 truth in front of large audiences. My background is in engineering and software creation. My business has provided me with significant time and freedom to learn the truth about the world around us. My goal is to expose Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development and Cultural Marxism.