9/11: Explosive Evidence and the War in Afghanistan

Richard Gage and David Ray Griffin will be speaking in Toronto on the subject of 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan.

9/11 has the establishment worried and groups such as Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth have come up as a topic in discussions in hearings regarding terrorism and domestic threats down south of us. Clearly the corrupt establishment, the opium dealers and banksters of the British Empire feel very threatened by the group started by Gage, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, of which I am a signatory along with more than 1000 other degreed engineers.

David Ray Griffin has written a number of very important books regarding the events of 9/11 that involve a thorough dissection of verifiable facts to completely dispute the official version of events surrounding 9/11 from all perspectives. Griffin is a highly regarded thought leader of the 9/11 truth movement and has provided most of the intellectual materials required to argue the official version with establishment supporters and apologists.

9/11 is the most important event in recent history as it provides the most clear and indisputable evidence that our leaders do not work in the interest of the common good over the societies in which they reside. Strong evidence suggests that 9/11 was executed in part on behalf of the British opium traders and in part on behalf of organizations such as the CIA, Council On Foreign Relations, etc to accelerate the development of a world government through warfare and the increases in wealth concentrations arising from such.

The third building "Building 7" contained evidence in its aftermath of past crimes by the above mentioned establishments and was totally destroyed to an extent far greater than would arise from a simple mechanical collapse of the buildings.

Knowledge of the building 7 collapse is brought to us by the truth movements of the internet and was practically ignored by mainstream media. Many people were not aware of this third, massive 47 story spook complex that was completely destroyed along with every bit of its contents on the day of 9/11.

Event: 9/11: Explosive Evidence and the War in Afghanistan
What: Lecture
Start Time: Sunday, May 2 at 7:00pm
End Time: Sunday, May 2 at 10:00pm
Where: Walter Hall, Edward Johnson Building

Contact the administrator of this event, Adam Parrott at Facebook for tickets.

Bonn or bust – The UN’s last, desperate bid for unelected world government

From SPPI Blog

From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Bonn

April 9, 2010

There are not many empty seats in the dismal, echoing conference chamber in the ghastly concrete box that is the Hotel Maritim here in Bonn, where the UN’s latest attempt to maneuver the 194 States Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change gets underway today.

The “international community”, as it is now called, is here in full force, in the shape of expensively-suited, shiny-shod bureaucrats with an urbane manner and absolutely no knowledge of climate science whatsoever.

However, one empty chair is a pointer of things to come. The Holy See – a tiny nation in its own right, with a billion citizens around the world – has left its chair empty. And that is significant. If “global warming” still mattered, the Vatican would make sure that its representatives were present throughout this gloomy gathering of world-government wannabes.

This emergency conference, called by the UN’s bureaucrats because they were terrified that Cancun this December might fail as spectacularly as Copenhagen did last year, is a much quieter affair than Copenhagen. Not only has the air of triumphalism gone, after the scandals of Climategate, Himalayagate, Amazongate and so forth, but the belief that “global warming” is a global crisis has largely gone too.

There are a few true-believers left among the national delegates, but more of them than before are open to discussion of the previously-forbidden question – what if the climate extremists have made the whole thing up?

The Chinese Xinhua News Agency, for instance, came up to the table manned by the environmental campaigners of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, which takes a hard-boiled, cynical view of the notion that a tiny increase in the atmospheric concentration of a trace gas is likely to cause a thousand international disasters.

The reporters were genuinely interested to hear that there is another side to the story. Huan Gongdi, the Agency’s senior correspondent in Germany, asked me what I thought of the Copenhagen accord (a waste of time), what was happening in Bonn (a desperate attempt to ram through a binding Treaty that can be put in front of the US Senate before the mid-term elections make Senate acceptance of any such treaty unthinkable), and whether or not there was a climate crisis anyway (there isn’t).

I explained to Mr. Huan that even if the UN had not exaggerated the warming effect of CO2 many times over there was still nothing we could do about the supposed “crisis”, because we were emitting so little of the stuff in the first place.

For the record, I did the sum in front of him. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 today is about 388 parts per million by volume. However, we are adding just 2 ppmv a year to the air. So the warming we cause each year, even if one believes the UN’s wild exaggerations of CO2’s warming effect, is just 4.7 times the natural logarithm of the proportionate increase in CO2 concentration from 388 to 390 ppmv.

Thus, 4.7 ln(390/388) = 0.043 Fahrenheit degrees – less than a twentieth of a Fahrenheit degree of “global warming” every year. That is all. Putting it another way, it would take almost a quarter of a century with no carbon-emitting activity at all – not a single train, plane, automobile, or fossil-fueled power station – to forestall just 1 Fahrenheit degree of “global warming”.

That is why no Treaty based on controlling the amount of carbon dioxide the world emits can possibly work. And that is why there is no hurry anyway. The only reason for the UN’s sense of urgency – a panic no longer felt by the majority of the delegates here – is that the bureaucrats know the game is up. Opinion polls throughout the free world show that no one now believes a word of the climate extremists’ nonsense any more. If they can’t get a binding treaty this year, they won’t get one at all, and they know it.

I shall be reporting frequently from the conference as events unfold. Check back often at www.sppiblog.org.

*************

This will be interesting to watch. Hopefully we see the AGW hypothesis in its death throes rather than being revived.

Paul Craig Roberts and 9/11

In an interview with Alex Jones, Paul Craig Roberts cites the gullibility and cowardice required to believe the official version of 9/11 as one of his reasons for retiring. He says that 9/11 has created an arena where truth is unwelcome. Truth is no longer relevant.

9/11 was an inside job. Its my litmus test - anyone who does not believe this cannot have any credibility. Anyone who does not openly state it could be an agent. Anyone who openly says it is much more than likely, not an agent. Thats how 9/11 can help us IMO.

The Bomb In The Brain

This is amazing.

Stephan Molyneux is a philosopher who uses philosophy to dissect what may be wrong with the world. He has some very interesting ideas, not all of which I agree with, but I must concede that he has spent a lot more time thinking about all this than I have. He is an anarchist, I am not. Given this information I can see his ideas more clearly. Molyneux has an Masters degree in philosophy from McGill in Montreal Canada.

He has a series of videos that suggest that many of our problems arise out of the fact that we are not reasonable as human beings. He has shown this to be true in the past. His very well backed up hypothesis is that early childhood abuse causes brain damage and the damaged brain is managed by amygdala, the actual reasoning part of the brain is run by ideologies rather than reason in the case of these brain damaged individuals. The book, "Political Ponerology" says the same thing with respect to soldiers damaged by fascism, interestingly enough. This book just keeps on coming up as I read and learn about all of this.

The system is built to put people in jail and punish them for what may be mental illness that could possibly be cured through therapy and excercise. But the Western system seems intent on locking people up. The reason for this, IMO, is that it generates waste and keeps the people down, under the thumb of the rulers which is a first priority in an authoritarian based system. We live under soft fascism, which is authoritarian but by means of propaganda rather than direct physical force.

Part 4, which is about 1/2 hour long is most interesting. If you don't have time for the whole thing, just watch part 4. Part 3 is a close second. Parts 1 & 2 are not nearly as important, but part 1 has some very interesting statistics. The stats are all around the ACE score, based on ten questions. You can do the test at http://www.acestudy.org/index.html.

Molyneux did a series of videos posted here:

P1



P2



P3



P4



P5