Climate Change Exposure: The Hidden Gem

The whole climate change supporting bureaucracy has been exposed through the efforts of a few heroic hackers. We all know this - at least those of us who can still think.

But, Lord Monckton, today on Alex Jones (3rd hour starting at the beginning of the 2nd hour) was calling for the abolition of the UN. Imagine that ! He calls for the formation of a world political party to oppose these morons at the local level.

He talks about the overpopulation goals of the AGW hypothesis supporters and speaks truth at every turn, without pulling any punches.

Science, Morality and Sanity

I have an absolute obsession with globalism and what has been happening around us and I have had this obsession since 2001. Its the most interesting thing that I have ever come across and there is something that is telling me there is hidden key someplace in the understanding of all of this. The hidden key may be all we need to magically make it all go away.

Maybe I can be the dude that connects the dots, win fame and fortune, and be loved all over the world - book signing tours, and ultimately having big fences to keep hoards of beautiful young women from breaking into my place - or least thats what Freud would probably say my real motive is. But I haven't read Freud yet so maybe thats not it. Maybe I am just trying to save my own ass in the most interesting way I know. Maybe I am bored because I don't have a "job" because I never liked regimentation to begin with (I don't confuse it with discipline and am self employed). My motivations are certainly important in considering my conclusions and I am not really sure what exactly my motivations are, all I know with absolute certainty is that I am motivated in figuring this out. Maybe an outside reader is better at figuring out my motivations than I am.

I don't read much because I have read someplace that is more important to read good material thoroughly than it is to read volumes of material. This is also in the bible, as I have recently discovered, so it must be true. It is for this reason and not my own natural intelligence (I am only average) that I have enough confidence in my beliefs to write them down.

Lately I have been thinking about the behaviour of people on newsgroups wrt agrguments related to globalism and how it can easily be shown to be at least childish, more than likely closer to insanity than simple childish behaviour, but this in a way not immediately evident on its face. I have the biologist that a fellow blogger (MaggiesMusings) in mind that she spoke about on my previous AGW post. The biologist said that the earth tilt has nothing to do with seasons, but in fact it defines seasons. To confidently state this about the earth tilt is a sign of arrogance, which is a sign of insanity (or just idiocy) when the speaker is wrong.

I know that the people who argue ridiculous things such as the AGW hypothesis to be true, or that buildings just naturally collapse straight down through their own axis (of greatest resistance) after fires actually know better. No one is really this stupid. Some of these people believe that the earth is overpopulated and something must be done. They believe they are in the moral right and are thus able to keep their sanity. How sure they are of the overpopulation problem I can not say. All I can say is that I don't believe it even a little bit - I don't think there is even a 1% chance that it is true.

But, what about the people who just work at jobs and are slowly being driven to exhaustion from long hours and stressful work that they actually hate ? They haven't had time to really consider all of this in most cases that I know of and they don't like talking about it. They are the driving force of the establishment just as the NCO's are the backbone of the army, as col Potter once said in M*A*S*H*. Their ability to reason is slowly being eroded.

We are all scientific to a certain extent, and the scientific method is really just a natural way that we think IMO, it was just brought to light from words on paper. Science and morality are a bad mix and we are forced to mix the two setting one above the other. For people that do not know the real agenda is depopulation, their morality is in constant conflict with their scientific mind and this is driving them insane. This is best illustrated in a book called Political Ponerology that describes that physiological changes in brain structure that occur in people when they are part of system where these two aspects of their minds are in constant conflict. The book was written from the perspective of polish doctors doing autopsies on soldiers and people in the establishment in the 1920's and 1930's and previous.

What was the real purpose of 9/11 ? Some may argue, including myself, that it was perhaps a distraction to confuse everyone from something bigger in the backround (end of 1933 bankruptcy) and/or to put a police state in place that will be necessary to enforce globalization. Some people argue that the attacks erased a lot of debt, both moral (demolishing CIA, etc records of wtc7) and monetary (destruction of records in towers), but the "debt" isn't real -its just imaginary and entirely dependent on a belief that it does exist so that is probably not it IMO. These two ideas are well supported, but lets consider the purpose of the AGW hypothesis for a moment.

Could anyone reasonably expect the AGW hypothesis to actually "fly" ? Many people knew it was a scam in the 1990's. Anyone who has any brains at all, confidence in their own discernment of political reality and who chooses to look into the AGW hypothesis can clearly see that its probably one of the most blatent and biggest frauds ever attempted. If it wasn't so serious many people would probably need to be medicated just to stop laughing.

The risk of failure of the AGW hypothesis had to have been considered, and what seems like a failure on the face may not actually be a failure at all. Maybe we were supposed to figure it out. That certainly must be true of the building collapses of 9/11.

If the purpose of the AGW hypothesis and of the terror attacks of 9/11 was actually to start driving a large portion of the population insane, then everything would make sense. Maybe when the last bits of the scientific dictatorship fall into place it will be the result of everyone figuring out that both 9/11 and AGW were a cruel hoax proving our own stupidity and lack of ability to govern ourselves.

To create a scientific dictatorship based on the use of carbon, it would make sense that a large portion of the population must be driven insane. Everything about our culture and religion speaks against this type of top down control and by driving the majority of us insane, we slowly learn to not trust our own judgement making us ripe for takeover and erasing the essence of who we are - we are anti-authoritarians to the very core of our beings in the West.

This idea came to me after waking from a nightmare, during which I was forced to lie to a friend who was a cop for the purposes of both saving my own ass from embarassment and from saving other people from having a target for which they could hate, after me doing something utterly stupid (an act of vandalism that speaks of teenage boredom and mischief). This is a mirror of which many other people face in reality, as the little people in the establishment get off on their little childish power trips in the same way I initially got off in my dream, but I could awaken. Those people that cannot awaken from the constant shocks (conflicts) in their minds must slowly be driving them insane.

In this moment of clarity I felt the need to get up and verbalize this idea before it faded away.

The motivation for all of this nonsense must be to drive the population insane and prepare them for a scientific dictatorship. I've been working on this idea for a long time, and have verbalized it before in other ways. I would really like it if someone could show me I am wrong. I'd hate to be on the wrong track all this time.

Questions for AGW Hypothesis Supporters

Much of the argument both for and against the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) hypothesis contains too many graphs and too much math. Its enough to turn non science educated people blue in the face, I would imagine. Much of it is meaningless and presented to generate confusion with false assumptions underlying the data presented.

Question 1. Is CO2 a major greenhouse gas ? Many scientists are saying that is is not. My favorite source for information on AGW is an interview between Dr. Timothy Ball and Black Krishna, an activist from Toronto. Sometimes this link gets broken but you can search "Black Krishna Timothy Ball" and find it easily. In this interview Dr. Ball makes the direct and falsifiable (can be shown to be false if so) statement that CO2 is an insignificant greenhouse gas. Many others such as Michael Coffman show the same thing in his movie "Global warming or Global Governance", which is also available free on the web.

Question 2. Do you believe that the 32000 scientists (9000 PhD's, 300 PhD Climate Scientists) listed on www.petitionproject.org are in cahoots with the oil companies to destroy the carbon cutting plans of our politicians to see the earth destroyed ?

Question 3. Have you given both sides of this argument equal consideration ? Are you afraid to give "the other side" a chance to present its evidence ? Did you know that many people change their opinions after watching "Global Warming or Global Governance"? Do you have to be knowledgeable and understanding of both sides of the AGW hypothesis argument to be of informed opinion ?

Question 4. Is it possible that the entire AGW hypothesis is to scare people into paying more tax and allowing certain special interest groups to collect billions of dollars in taxes ?

Question 5. Do you believe that scientists working for the government are free to speak their minds ? If so, why haven't more university and establishment employed engineers and architects spoken out about the obviously false government explanation surrounding 9/11 and in particular the building collapses ?

Question 6. Could it be that this whole carbon scam is to replace our existing fraudulent banking system with an equivalent fraud that only serves the ruling elite with carbon credits ?

Question 7. Is it possible that this whole AGW hypothesis was created to distract us from obviously more pressing issues such as economic collapse, corrupt money, unethical bailouts and all of the wars ?

The AGW issue is the issue of the day, we must re-activate on this. The carbon tax will soon be signed into law in the USA and there will be no turning back from this global agreement unless other countries who will be beneficiaries of some of this tax will let us out of it. Canada will do whatever the USA does and once its done, its done. Discussion groups on the web seem to be dominated by AGW hypothesis supporters.

Maybe more good and simple questions can be posed. When we ask questions we are "as_king" and take control of debates.

Remembering What We Should Remember

Remembrance Day is a day that we should all remember what it is exactly that we should be remembering. As Donald Rumsfeld once explained, there are things that we know we don't know and there are things we don't know that we don't know. For many members of our populations, many do not know that they do not know why we actually have wars and how to figure out who the winners and losers are.

World War 1:

Winners: The central banks and governments of both countries won this war. The banks accumulated more debt to be recovered through the (then new) income tax and were able to use these profits to expand their puppet governments to get them to accumulate even more debt and eventually drive the USA into bankruptcy (1933) and the German people into shame and debt in believing they actually started the war. The bankruptcy of the USA allowed the banks to entirely take over the government in the same way a Ch 11 bankruptcy takes over a bankrupt corporation. The government was now run by Trust Law as a result of Ch. 11, making government the parent and the people the children. Parents can and sometimes must lie to their children. Its OK, go back to sleep...

Losers: The people who fought in the war who were killed or maimed on the battlefield from all countries involved lost. The people back home whose government borrowed the money from private banks to pay for it all and received a bigger more corrupt government and higher amounts of taxes and corruption to pay for the ballooning debt. They also got the beginnings of a public education system to dumb them down even more and keep them fighting more wars. People became children and the corrupt government their parent, giving the government tacit control over the thoughts and actions of the populations.

World War 2:

Winners: Nazis who wanted world government received the UN after the initial attempt at the League of Nations failed after World War1. (Americans were too smart to fall for it after World War 1, but a few more years of public education eliminated this problem.) . Big Nazis such as Prescott Bush and the Royal Societies in Britain as well as others did well as a result of World War 2. Governments of both sides got bigger and more corrupt, banks profited from massive rebuilding (and massive borrowing) after the bombings and destruction. More debt gave more power to banks and in turn to the public government. Administrative Procedures Act adopted in USA as a result of bigger and more corrupt government in 1947, giving governments more power over dumber citizens. The arms race started as a result of World War 2 leading USA to weaponize space, necessary to enforce world government as well as waste all kinds of privately borrowed money in an arms race that no one could ever win assuring them that a nuclear standoff could never occur (MAD).

Losers: The people who got the UN to govern over them now face Codex Alimentarius and Vaccines, the most diabolical plans likely ever developed by mankind for the purposes of depopulation. The people now are accustomed to giving up all their rights when they enter a court room, thanks to the Administrative Procedures Act. After a few years of public education after world war 1, were now ready after world war 2 to receive Fluoride in their water to dumb them down even further. More income tax, more wars and more drugs to dumb everyone down even further over the next 50 years. People also got massive amounts of street drugs to dumb them down even further and drive them into poverty while providing CIA with black operations funding to corrupt other governments, start even more wars with the goal of putting private central banks into other countries so that their populations could get what we have been getting.

All The Other Wars: Korea, Vietnam, Central America, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, South Africa, the Cold War, + All The Other Wars such as the ones in the Congo and Haiti That No One Is Supposed to Know Or Think About:

Winners: The banks have been consistently winning all wars, the wars and black operations have put privately owned central banks in all the countries we have had wars with. The central banks have brought income tax and public education for the people to meet their Marxist ambitions of a centrally controlled government, along with Fluoride in their water to keep them silly enough to keep going along with all this. What the silly Marxists often forget is that these are corporate controlled governments, not governments of "the people".

Losers: Same as always, the people who receive public education, fluoride in their water, drugs on their streets and higher taxes and a bigger police force and more corrupt courts and more taxes to pay for it all. Because of their new found stupidity they get duped into fighting more wars to expand the diabolical UN system of control to other countries. The space race will soon give governments absolute rather than tacit control over the world citizenry as we exchange our wooden yokes for iron ones.

The end game is forced vaccinations and Codex Alimentarius, necessary for a 95% world depopulation as fewer slaves will be needed in the technological society.