The Oil Spill

According to Lindsey Williams, the oil drilling that BP was doing in the gulf was wholly unnecessary and entailed unnecessary risk. The Bakken Formation in North Dakota contains eight times the amount of oil that is in Saudi Arabia according to Williams but the American government would not allow the drilling. The oil found in Alaska alone would be enough to supply America for the next 200 years but it is protected because it is also a wildlife reserve.

The gulf drilling went to a depth of approximately 30,000 feet from the surface of the earth, 25,000 feet of crust and 5000 ft of water. Drilling to this depth is the absolute limit of human technology - on land. The Russians have drilled as far as 40,000 ft- on land.

The Russians have been successfully deep drilling for oil on land for a long time and its well known that massive oil reserves exist at great depths below the surface of the earth. Peak oil was a scam, just like global warming, and muslim terrorism. Peak oil was a myth to justify high oil prices and give further reason for austerity measures.

When something goes wrong with the drilling on land the accident can be contained and controlled. The risk of doing this underwater at 5000 ft depth was too great. The unanticipated pressure burst the safety valves and was guessed at being approximately what the Russians had experienced when drilling to 40,000 feet. In reality the pressure was far greater and uncontainable. The safety valves used were the best available.

The magnitude of the oil spill dwarfs any oil spill of the past and only theories provide means of dealing with it. Its cause was the environmental policies that restricted access to oil located elsewhere to save us from the phoney myth of global warming due to CO2 production from burning oil.

Dialogue With Law Enforcement

I have heard quite a few of these on You Tube, I have a fictional account of how it should go.

Law Enforcement: (LE) Would you step out of the car please ?

Man: Why ?

LE: We don't need a reason. I'm asking you to step out of the car now please sir.

Man: Isn't this because your job is to bitch slap everyone you encounter and remind them who is in charge because you are the minion of the dope dealers, pedophiles, murderers and child molesting satanists that run this planet and that are trying to subjugate humanity into a society in which they no longer have the right to freedom or happiness ?

LE: We are just protecting you from terrorists sir.

Man: What terrorists ? I am not a terrorist ! I have never even applied for a job with any intelligence agency or police force. You do know that all these attacks are inside jobs don't you ? Who do you think did 9/11 ?

LE: We get attempted terrorist attacks all the time. You would be surprised.

Man: Don't tell me, let me guess, you hear about these so called attempted terrorist attacks all the time don't you ? And you and all of your buddies on the force have never encountered one but yet it happens all the time - right ?

LE: We are just trying to do our jobs.

Man: And your job is to bitch slap everyone that comes along because you have the belief that it is plausible that there has been terrorist attacks that you have heard of inside your organization and these threats have been kept from the public to prevent them from being afraid - right ?

Did you ever think that these terrorist attacks you hear about aren't real and that you believe them because you are not given all the details and that you have no way of seeing any evidence that would falsify them ? - that these are fake and there is the fact that you are paid to believe them ? They give you the necessary weak excuse to treat everyone you encounter as your enemy- right ?

Did you ever think that these rumours would not stand up to public scrutiny and be exposed as inside jobs or rumours if the public ever heard of them ?

LE: Why do you think we are here doing this ?

Man: To bitch slap the population into submission, to remind us whos boss and to help us along in getting comfortable with it, to make us accustomed to fear. Also, to generate waste and make the country go broke faster so that the ruling classes (Borgeoise) take over faster.

LE: What do you think we should do about it ?

Man: Bitch slap anyone who is drinking the kool-aid. Bitch slap them into the realities of the police state that will not only destroy people like me, but you as well. You will be next on the list, soon after taking our guns away they will take your guns away. Force them into understanding reality and understanding that cowardice is not a form of protection.

****************************************

Police are people too. The maintenance of truth is the public responsibility because truth is in the public interest. If we do not maintain truth, how can we expect anyone else to acknowledge it ? If we do not maintain it, it is a dying entity. It is a waste of effort for our governments and law enforcement to maintain it. If we do not maintain it, it will die and no one wants to be flogging a dead horse.

***************************************

We are a society that has a very loose relationship with truth. We forget that the dielectic (basically argument) is the path to truth. We are fearful to argue to find truth for fear of offending someone, we do not acknowledge and espouse truth when it matters- especially when it matters most because that is when we offend the most. If we fearlessly spread it we will win- because we will be wiser. It is a war of words and ideas, not bullets. Argument forces us to use reason and it detaches us from the emotional aspects of what is being argued, exposing and justifying eternal truth.

Conflict brings about change and understanding, great philosophers such as Plato, Renaissance philosophers such as Locke, Rousseau, and Hobbs come from times and regions of conflict.

Challenge one-anothers beliefs. John Stuart Mill wrote a book called "On Liberty" in which he discusses censorship. It is the common belief that people that go around challenging accepted truths or espouse lies do us damage and that they need to be censored. People that spread lies make us think and remember why we know what is true to be true, otherwise we forget and soon after forget the truth itself. Without challenges we forget why we believe what is true to be true. Challenges are the only important dialogue we can have - they enhance understanding and a maintain truth.

Sitting around and agreeing with each other all the time can only make us stupid- its like buying a new house and never painting it and letting it fall apart. Only a challenge to an accepted belief can preserve a valid accepted belief- and it can erase a falsehood.

Ask questions that create arguments.

People that would censor are not truth seekers or preservers of truth. They are the egotists and will never add anything worthwhile to a movement or participate in the discovery or unveiling of new ideas that challenge the ideas and morality that got us to where we are.

We have been brainwashed to reject argument by the very people who wish to dumb us down. Taking argument away in our culture makes us forget why certain truths are true. It is part of the psychological war directed against us. People who argue are our friends, just as our true friends tell us things we may not wish to hear.

Argument returns us to reason and reminds us how to think.

Gardisil: Doctors Speak Out

Its difficult to imagine that the pharmaceutical companies would actually create a vaccine that is actually harmful - until you learn about fluoride. Once people awaken to the realities of fluoride, then the idea that Gardasil may actually be harmful and purposefully released to children for the purposes of being harmful not only becomes believable, but likely.

There are many links on the internet that describe the realities of fluoride, anyone doing casual research can quickly and easily see that fluoride is a harmful substance that should not be ingested. They put it in our drinking water and this realty shows that our leadership is likely one of the most diabolical and sadistic ones that has ever existed in the history of mankind.

The video below contains some important information from a few heroic doctors that have spoken out. Doctors are no longer required to take the Hippocratic oath to practice medicine, a fact that most people are unaware. These few doctors behave as though they had.

Medicine is now governed by the dictates of public policy, the red menace that has been creeping into society since the administrative procedures act in the late forties.



The oath that doctors are no longer required to take is given below:

"I swear by Apollo the Physician and Asclepius and Hygieia and Panaceia and all the gods, and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will fulfill according to my ability and judgment this oath and this covenant:

To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to my parents and to live my life in partnership with him, and if he is in need of money to give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my brothers in male lineage and to teach them this art–if they desire to learn it–without fee and covenant; to give a share of precepts and oral instruction and all the other learning to my sons and to the sons of him who has instructed me and to pupils who have signed the covenant and have taken the oath according to medical law, but to no one else.

I will apply dietic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.

I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.

I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in this work.

Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free or slaves.

What I may see or hear in the course of treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep myself holding such things shameful to be spoken about.

If I fulfill this oath and do not violate it, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame among all men for all time to come; if I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite of all this be my lot."

Hippocratic Oath

9/11: Explosive Evidence and the War in Afghanistan

Richard Gage and David Ray Griffin will be speaking in Toronto on the subject of 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan.

9/11 has the establishment worried and groups such as Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth have come up as a topic in discussions in hearings regarding terrorism and domestic threats down south of us. Clearly the corrupt establishment, the opium dealers and banksters of the British Empire feel very threatened by the group started by Gage, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, of which I am a signatory along with more than 1000 other degreed engineers.

David Ray Griffin has written a number of very important books regarding the events of 9/11 that involve a thorough dissection of verifiable facts to completely dispute the official version of events surrounding 9/11 from all perspectives. Griffin is a highly regarded thought leader of the 9/11 truth movement and has provided most of the intellectual materials required to argue the official version with establishment supporters and apologists.

9/11 is the most important event in recent history as it provides the most clear and indisputable evidence that our leaders do not work in the interest of the common good over the societies in which they reside. Strong evidence suggests that 9/11 was executed in part on behalf of the British opium traders and in part on behalf of organizations such as the CIA, Council On Foreign Relations, etc to accelerate the development of a world government through warfare and the increases in wealth concentrations arising from such.

The third building "Building 7" contained evidence in its aftermath of past crimes by the above mentioned establishments and was totally destroyed to an extent far greater than would arise from a simple mechanical collapse of the buildings.

Knowledge of the building 7 collapse is brought to us by the truth movements of the internet and was practically ignored by mainstream media. Many people were not aware of this third, massive 47 story spook complex that was completely destroyed along with every bit of its contents on the day of 9/11.

Event: 9/11: Explosive Evidence and the War in Afghanistan
What: Lecture
Start Time: Sunday, May 2 at 7:00pm
End Time: Sunday, May 2 at 10:00pm
Where: Walter Hall, Edward Johnson Building

Contact the administrator of this event, Adam Parrott at Facebook for tickets.

Bonn or bust – The UN’s last, desperate bid for unelected world government

From SPPI Blog

From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Bonn

April 9, 2010

There are not many empty seats in the dismal, echoing conference chamber in the ghastly concrete box that is the Hotel Maritim here in Bonn, where the UN’s latest attempt to maneuver the 194 States Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change gets underway today.

The “international community”, as it is now called, is here in full force, in the shape of expensively-suited, shiny-shod bureaucrats with an urbane manner and absolutely no knowledge of climate science whatsoever.

However, one empty chair is a pointer of things to come. The Holy See – a tiny nation in its own right, with a billion citizens around the world – has left its chair empty. And that is significant. If “global warming” still mattered, the Vatican would make sure that its representatives were present throughout this gloomy gathering of world-government wannabes.

This emergency conference, called by the UN’s bureaucrats because they were terrified that Cancun this December might fail as spectacularly as Copenhagen did last year, is a much quieter affair than Copenhagen. Not only has the air of triumphalism gone, after the scandals of Climategate, Himalayagate, Amazongate and so forth, but the belief that “global warming” is a global crisis has largely gone too.

There are a few true-believers left among the national delegates, but more of them than before are open to discussion of the previously-forbidden question – what if the climate extremists have made the whole thing up?

The Chinese Xinhua News Agency, for instance, came up to the table manned by the environmental campaigners of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, which takes a hard-boiled, cynical view of the notion that a tiny increase in the atmospheric concentration of a trace gas is likely to cause a thousand international disasters.

The reporters were genuinely interested to hear that there is another side to the story. Huan Gongdi, the Agency’s senior correspondent in Germany, asked me what I thought of the Copenhagen accord (a waste of time), what was happening in Bonn (a desperate attempt to ram through a binding Treaty that can be put in front of the US Senate before the mid-term elections make Senate acceptance of any such treaty unthinkable), and whether or not there was a climate crisis anyway (there isn’t).

I explained to Mr. Huan that even if the UN had not exaggerated the warming effect of CO2 many times over there was still nothing we could do about the supposed “crisis”, because we were emitting so little of the stuff in the first place.

For the record, I did the sum in front of him. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 today is about 388 parts per million by volume. However, we are adding just 2 ppmv a year to the air. So the warming we cause each year, even if one believes the UN’s wild exaggerations of CO2’s warming effect, is just 4.7 times the natural logarithm of the proportionate increase in CO2 concentration from 388 to 390 ppmv.

Thus, 4.7 ln(390/388) = 0.043 Fahrenheit degrees – less than a twentieth of a Fahrenheit degree of “global warming” every year. That is all. Putting it another way, it would take almost a quarter of a century with no carbon-emitting activity at all – not a single train, plane, automobile, or fossil-fueled power station – to forestall just 1 Fahrenheit degree of “global warming”.

That is why no Treaty based on controlling the amount of carbon dioxide the world emits can possibly work. And that is why there is no hurry anyway. The only reason for the UN’s sense of urgency – a panic no longer felt by the majority of the delegates here – is that the bureaucrats know the game is up. Opinion polls throughout the free world show that no one now believes a word of the climate extremists’ nonsense any more. If they can’t get a binding treaty this year, they won’t get one at all, and they know it.

I shall be reporting frequently from the conference as events unfold. Check back often at www.sppiblog.org.

*************

This will be interesting to watch. Hopefully we see the AGW hypothesis in its death throes rather than being revived.

Paul Craig Roberts and 9/11

In an interview with Alex Jones, Paul Craig Roberts cites the gullibility and cowardice required to believe the official version of 9/11 as one of his reasons for retiring. He says that 9/11 has created an arena where truth is unwelcome. Truth is no longer relevant.

9/11 was an inside job. Its my litmus test - anyone who does not believe this cannot have any credibility. Anyone who does not openly state it could be an agent. Anyone who openly says it is much more than likely, not an agent. Thats how 9/11 can help us IMO.

The Bomb In The Brain

This is amazing.

Stephan Molyneux is a philosopher who uses philosophy to dissect what may be wrong with the world. He has some very interesting ideas, not all of which I agree with, but I must concede that he has spent a lot more time thinking about all this than I have. He is an anarchist, I am not. Given this information I can see his ideas more clearly. Molyneux has an Masters degree in philosophy from McGill in Montreal Canada.

He has a series of videos that suggest that many of our problems arise out of the fact that we are not reasonable as human beings. He has shown this to be true in the past. His very well backed up hypothesis is that early childhood abuse causes brain damage and the damaged brain is managed by amygdala, the actual reasoning part of the brain is run by ideologies rather than reason in the case of these brain damaged individuals. The book, "Political Ponerology" says the same thing with respect to soldiers damaged by fascism, interestingly enough. This book just keeps on coming up as I read and learn about all of this.

The system is built to put people in jail and punish them for what may be mental illness that could possibly be cured through therapy and excercise. But the Western system seems intent on locking people up. The reason for this, IMO, is that it generates waste and keeps the people down, under the thumb of the rulers which is a first priority in an authoritarian based system. We live under soft fascism, which is authoritarian but by means of propaganda rather than direct physical force.

Part 4, which is about 1/2 hour long is most interesting. If you don't have time for the whole thing, just watch part 4. Part 3 is a close second. Parts 1 & 2 are not nearly as important, but part 1 has some very interesting statistics. The stats are all around the ACE score, based on ten questions. You can do the test at http://www.acestudy.org/index.html.

Molyneux did a series of videos posted here:

P1



P2



P3



P4



P5